You have /5 articles left.
Sign up for a free account or log in.
In a famous passage in his 1919 lecture on “Science as a Vocation,” Max Weber explores the meaning of death in modernity. He contrasts the lives of people in traditional, agrarian societies, represented by the biblical figure Abraham, with those of modern individuals.
For people like Abraham, life could be experienced as a coherent, organic whole. Having experienced the fullness of life, such individuals could approach death with a sense of completion and peace. Death, in this view, was the natural conclusion to a life well lived and fully experienced, free of unresolved desires or aspirations. This outlook was supported by a worldview that saw life in cycles—birth, growth, aging, death—allowing for a feeling of fulfillment and “enoughness” at the end of life.
By contrast, Weber suggests that the modern individual experiences life as part of a never-ending “chain of progress.” A modern individual can never reach an endpoint, as new possibilities and unanswered questions constantly emerge. This open-ended process makes fulfillment impossible, as each achievement is only provisional, soon surpassed by new discoveries and ideas.
For the “civilized man,” then, death arrives before life’s goals can be fully realized or its mysteries comprehensively understood. Death becomes meaningless because it simply cuts off an unfinished life, leaving modern individuals without a sense of wholeness or closure. In this sense, the very essence of modern progress—its lack of a defined endpoint—condemns both life and death to meaninglessness.
This creates a paradox: Death, instead of being a meaningful end, becomes a meaningless interruption. Consequently, the relentless nature of modern progress makes both life and death feel somewhat empty or lacking in intrinsic purpose.
Weber’s words expose a central tension in modernity: While progress drives civilization forward, it also imposes a sense of incompleteness on individual lives. This sense of unending striving fosters anxiety, alienation and even existential despair. By comparing modern lives to those of earlier, preindustrial societies, Weber invites readers to question whether modern progress, with all its achievements, may have come at the cost of a profound crisis of meaning and fulfillment.
Is Weber’s assessment overly pessimistic? While modern individuals may lack the sense of closure that traditional cycles offered, can the continuous quest for knowledge and growth itself provide meaning? From this perspective, progress can be seen not merely as a relentless treadmill but as a source of purpose, allowing individuals to contribute to a broader, collective future. In this sense, the meaning of life might not lie in achieving finality but in contributing to the ongoing project of human civilization.
Weber’s lecture underscores a critical, existential dilemma of modernity: the conflict between our endless drive for growth, improvement, acquisition and progress and our need for meaningful closure. For Weber, the endless pursuit of progress risks rendering life fragmented and death devoid of meaning and purpose.
Yet this perspective also invites us to reimagine what it means to live a meaningful life today. If we cannot reach an endpoint, perhaps our task is to find value in the process, embracing our role in an evolving continuum rather than seeking a final resolution. In doing so, we might reclaim a sense of purpose that, while different from that of traditional societies, speaks to the unique possibilities and responsibilities of our time.
Weber’s reflections on the meaning of life and death reflect his broader concerns with modernity, rationalization and the “disenchantment” of the world, where traditional sources of meaning and fulfillment are increasingly eroded.
Weber argues that modernity has made dying more difficult in existential terms. He suggests that as societies moved away from traditional religious and metaphysical worldviews, people lost the sense of meaning and coherence that once framed their lives and deaths as part of a natural, cyclical order.
In premodern societies, death was often perceived within a larger religious or communal context that gave it meaning, such as the belief in an afterlife or the continuation of a divine plan. This framework provided individuals with a sense of fulfillment and closure, even as they faced death.
Weber contends that modernity, by promoting secularization and scientific rationalism, has stripped away these comforting narratives, leaving individuals without a shared cultural or spiritual framework to make sense of death.
Science, in Weber’s view, may explain the biological process of death, but it does not provide answers to existential questions about why we die or what happens after death. As a result, many people in modern society may feel that their lives lack ultimate meaning and dying becomes an experience of isolation and uncertainty.
The absence of transcendent meaning or a communal understanding of death leaves individuals confronting mortality as an existential void rather than as part of a natural or divine cycle.
For those of us who have watched a parent or a mentor die, Weber’s words remain extremely relevant. Many of our loved ones face death in highly individualized, medicalized settings—such as hospitals or care facilities—disconnected from family, community or spiritual practices.
The focus on extending life through medical intervention exacerbates this sense of isolation, as the dying process becomes prolonged and technical rather than integrated into a meaningful life narrative. This can lead to feelings of depression and existential anxiety, as individuals struggle to find meaning or closure in their final days.
True, many of those who are dying do find meaning in the comfort offered by love and friendship, while movements like hospice care, death doulas and efforts to revive death rituals aim to reintroduce a sense of community, dignity and purpose into the process of dying. These efforts suggest that while modernity may have complicated the experience of death, there are still ways in which individuals and societies can seek to reintegrate meaning into the end of life.
The question remains open as to how contemporary societies can better address the emotional and existential dimensions of death in a world where traditional frameworks have diminished.
A number of influential writers, philosophers and thinkers have explored how secular individuals find meaning and closure in the face of mortality through connections with loved ones, nature and the continuity of life.
David Hume, the Scottish Enlightenment philosopher and skeptic, viewed death without fear or anticipation of an afterlife. In his essays and letters, he suggests that a meaningful life can be found in pleasure, friendship and intellectual pursuits, showing that fulfillment is possible even within a finite existence.
Albert Camus, in The Myth of Sisyphus, grapples with life’s “absurdity” and suggests that despite the lack of ultimate meaning, one can live fully by embracing experiences and relationships passionately. Camus advocates for a “lucid consciousness,” where meaning is created through one’s actions and connections, even in the absence of an afterlife.
In Man’s Search for Meaning, Viktor Frankl, a Holocaust survivor and psychologist, demonstrates that individuals can find purpose amid suffering by focusing on values larger than themselves. For Frankl, meaning is found not in abstract ideals but in small, daily acts of love, creation and kindness that bind people to one another.
Joan Didion’s The Year of Magical Thinking and Blue Nights reflect on grief, mortality and the passage of time following the loss of her husband and daughter. Through memory and love, Didion finds continuity and closure, suggesting that remembrance and connection can bridge even death’s divide.
Carl Sagan, in works like Pale Blue Dot, emphasizes humanity’s shared journey and interconnectedness with all life on Earth. Rejecting an afterlife, Sagan finds profound meaning in the wonder of existence within the vast cosmos and the significance of our relationships within it.
Irvin D. Yalom’s Staring at the Sun: Overcoming the Terror of Death discusses how people can face mortality by accepting its inevitability and cultivating deep, meaningful connections. Yalom sees death as a motivator to live authentically and purposefully, finding fulfillment in the present moment.
Philip Larkin’s poetry, while often reflecting a somber view of mortality, suggests that the fleeting nature of life intensifies our relationships and experiences. His work reveals that meaning can arise from cherishing life precisely because it is temporary.
Christopher Hitchens, in his memoir Mortality, wrote about his terminal illness without expectation of an afterlife, finding meaning in curiosity, human connection and the legacy one leaves through ideas, relationships and actions.
Rebecca Solnit, especially in A Field Guide to Getting Lost, explores themes of uncertainty, impermanence and connection. For Solnit, meaning is found in nature, art and human relationships, showing that secular purpose can arise from engagement with the world around us.
In works like Upheavals of Thought, philosopher Martha Nussbaum examines how emotions, relationships and ethical responsibilities shape a meaningful life. Nussbaum emphasizes love, empathy and social justice as pathways to purpose and connection for secular individuals.
These thinkers collectively suggest that secular individuals, even without belief in an afterlife, can find meaning and closure by living fully, connecting with others, contributing to society and embracing the natural world. They argue that individuals can see themselves as part of something larger—a shared human legacy.
Relationships with family, friends and loved ones create enduring bonds that can outlast an individual’s lifetime. Through memories, stories and values, individuals remain present in the lives of those they touched, shaping future generations. This continuity offers comfort and a sense that they live on through these connections.
Meaning can also be found in the legacies people leave, not necessarily through fame or monumental accomplishments, but through everyday acts that ripple forward. Kindness shown, relationships built, values shared and contributions to community and society leave a lasting impact, reminding individuals that their actions continue to influence others.
By seeing themselves as part of nature’s cycles—birth, growth, decay and rebirth—individuals can find comfort in their role within a grand, continuous design. Recognizing that, like all living beings, they will return to the earth to nourish new life can foster a sense of belonging to the natural world and its continuity.
For some, meaning comes from knowing that their work, insights or creativity will persist after they’re gone. Artists, teachers, scientists and others who contribute to knowledge, culture and progress view themselves as part of an intellectual and cultural continuum that will endure, creating a profound sense of continuity with humanity’s journey.
Many secular individuals find peace through philosophical perspectives that emphasize acceptance. By embracing life’s impermanence and finding beauty in its brevity, they cultivate fulfillment. The Stoic approach, for example, encourages viewing death as a natural part of life’s cycle, fostering acceptance and tranquility in facing the inevitable.
A focus on the present allows people to savor life without concern for an afterlife. By immersing themselves in experiences, relationships and sensations, they find intrinsic value in each moment, cultivating a sense of enoughness and living fully.
Finally, secular individuals may find meaning in contemplating humanity’s interconnectedness, past, present and future. Understanding that they are shaped by those before them and will influence those after reinforces a sense of belonging to the shared human journey. Many feel a kind of transcendence in being part of the “long now,” woven into the ongoing tapestry of human existence.
Several modern memoirs, novels and plays grapple with death in secular societies, where traditional beliefs in an afterlife or divine plan are absent. These works confront death as a final, often incomprehensible endpoint and explore the existential challenges this poses for characters seeking meaning, closure or continuity.
John Updike’s Rabbit at Rest, the final novel in his Rabbit series, follows the aging Harry “Rabbit” Angstrom as he faces mortality with a mix of dread, regret and nostalgia. Updike portrays Rabbit’s decline with a secular focus on the body, health and memory, highlighting the existential reality of death in a world without resurrection or metaphysical consolation.
Don DeLillo’s White Noise examines the struggle to find significance in a world without spiritual assurances. Through the protagonist’s anxieties about mortality, DeLillo critiques materialism, scientific advances and superficial culture as insufficient to confront the profound reality of death.
Joan Didion’s The Year of Magical Thinking grapples with the sudden loss of her husband and the secular struggle to make sense of such grief. Without a religious framework to provide meaning, Didion navigates disbelief and yearning, seeking purpose in death’s finality while immersed in a profoundly secular world.
Max Porter’s Grief Is the Thing With Feathers follows a father and his sons as they cope with the loss of a wife and mother. The arrival of the anthropomorphic figure Crow, representing grief and memory, challenges the family to process death without spiritual reassurance, using metaphor and introspection to grapple with loss.
Tony Kushner’s play Angels in America, set against the backdrop of the AIDS crisis, explores mortality, suffering and the search for meaning in a secular context. His characters face death without salvation’s promise, finding solace instead in human connection. Kushner critically examines how secular communities process grief and loss in the face of existential despair.
Each of these works reflects the unique dilemmas faced by individuals who must create purpose and find closure without metaphysical beliefs, often relying on human relationships, personal resilience or introspection to make peace with the inevitability of death. Together, they underscore the challenge and courage required to confront mortality in a secular age.
Several times in my life, friends—who I didn’t know were dying—called to say goodbye, leaving me deeply shaken when I learned days later that they had passed away. I was left stricken by words I should have said, sentiments I should have conveyed.
In a secular world, where belief in an afterlife or divine purpose is absent, we must find meaning and purpose without metaphysical reassurances or promises of paradise. In such societies, individuals find meaning and closure in death through legacy, human connection and the enduring cycle of life. This approach requires us to redefine death—not as a passage to another world, but as an occasion to focus on the impact of our lives and the ways our contributions echo beyond our time.
Rather than drawing comfort from metaphysical promises, secular individuals construct narratives of purpose through relationships, cultural contributions and a profound acceptance of mortality as an intrinsic part of human existence. Embracing the finiteness of life with gratitude, we transform mortality from an unknowable void into a meaningful chapter in life’s continuum, linking us to both past and future generations.
By emphasizing memory, community and the acceptance of a life that is finite yet significant, secular approaches to death enable people to transcend fear and find peace. This view makes death not the end of significance but an integral part of a shared human journey.
Existentialist philosophy may no longer hold the prominence it once did in contemporary intellectual circles, but its core concerns—such as the search for meaning in an indifferent universe, the burden of freedom and especially the confrontation with mortality—remain deeply resonant for the human experience.
The awareness of death, central to existentialism, compels individuals to confront life’s finite nature and question what it means to live authentically in light of inevitable mortality. As long as people grapple with questions of purpose, freedom and alienation, existentialism will likely resurface as a framework for understanding and addressing these perennial struggles.
In today’s era of rapid technological and social change, many experience a form of “existential drift,” as traditional sources of meaning, like religion, family structures and stable communities, lose influence or evolve in unpredictable ways. The existentialist call to create meaning in an uncertain world speaks powerfully to those feeling unmoored by these shifting foundations, especially in the face of life’s finality.
Existentialist thinkers argued that an authentic life—a life where one acknowledges and accepts death—can sharpen the meaning of each moment lived, turning the confrontation with mortality into a source of urgency and purpose.
Sartre’s concept of “authenticity” is particularly relevant in a world shaped by social media, where digital interactions often feel superficial or alienating. For existentialists, to be authentic is to be fully conscious of one’s mortality and to live intentionally, rather than allowing life to pass by in distracted complacency. Sartre’s concept remains crucial as people navigate today’s often impersonal digital world, even as today’s academic focus may prioritize structural over individual approaches to meaning.
The existential confrontation with mortality also gains relevance as technological advances distance people from direct, authentic human experiences. Artificial intelligence, for example, raises profound questions about consciousness, autonomy and what it means to be fully human—all of which return to existentialist themes of self-awareness and mortality.
Sartre’s concept of “bad faith” can illuminate modern escapist tendencies, where people retreat into curated online personas or virtual worlds to avoid the unsettling “nausea” of confronting their finitude. In contrast, existentialism’s call for authenticity provides a counterpoint, urging people to confront rather than avoid life’s fundamental challenges and limitations.
Global crises—such as climate change, political instability and socioeconomic inequality—further intensify existential dread, forcing individuals to confront their own mortality, their responsibility and the limitations of human control. These crises expose the fragility of life and, paradoxically, strengthen existentialism’s focus on confronting the reality of death head-on, reminding people that, in uncertain times, meaningful action requires acknowledging mortality. Existentialism, therefore, offers a framework to reconcile individual agency with collective crises, empowering people to act even in the face of seemingly insurmountable odds.
While contemporary philosophy may lean toward analytic or systemic theories, existentialism’s intensely personal perspective remains relevant. By urging introspection, authenticity and a direct confrontation with mortality, it provides a much-needed counterbalance to today’s often externalized, digitized existence. As long as people seek answers to the profound why questions and face the inevitability of death, existentialism will persist as a source of intellectual and emotional insight, addressing today’s alienation and reminding individuals of their capacity for self-determination and resilience.
In this way, existentialism challenges us not only to live meaningfully but to find purpose in the face of life’s brevity, transforming mortality from a source of dread into a call for authenticity, connection and courageous action in an ever-changing world.
