You have /5 articles left.
Sign up for a free account or log in.

John Cage, an icon of the contemporary avant-garde, occupies an odd status in the music world.

A seminal figure in the history of post-World War II music, Cage, who died in 1992, stood at the forefront of musical innovation and experimentation. But while his works are regarded with respect by many music critics and academics and an army of dedicated admirers, these pieces have been met with resistance and controversy by large swaths of the concert-going audience.

Cage’s study of Zen Buddhism profoundly influenced his approach to composition and performance, emphasizing the importance of mindfulness, presence and acceptance of uncertainty. His 1952 composition “4'33” (pronounced "four minutes, thirty-three seconds") is notable because the performers sit silently, and the “music” consists of the sounds occurring in the environment during that time. This piece has been interpreted as a significant philosophical statement on the nature of music and listening. But Cage’s boundary-pushing approach and his expanded definition of what music is has also been dismissed as pretentious and overly theoretical.

Yet despite the mixed reactions, Cage’s influence on popular culture and contemporary music is undeniable. He redefined what can be included in music, influencing more recent composers to explore nontraditional sounds, textures, and silence as integral parts of their compositions. By incorporating randomness and allowing performers significant freedom in how pieces are played, Cage challenged the composer-performer hierarchy and inspired many contemporary musicians to explore similar methods​.

Cage’s use of indeterminacy in musical composition involved leaving certain elements of the performance to chance, or eliminating the composer’s control over the final outcome. This approach is epitomized in works like “Music of Changes” where Cage used the I Ching, an ancient Chinese divination text, to make compositional decisions.

Cage has also employed random procedures to determine various aspects of his compositions, from note selection to dynamics and durations. This method is evident in his “Imaginary Landscape No. 4,” with the performers adjusting the frequency and volume according to a score determined by chance operations. His belief that all sounds are potential music is evident in works like “Water Walk,” where the performer uses a variety of household objects and appliances to produce sound.

Cage’s “prepared piano” involved placing objects (like screws, bolts, and rubber) on or between the strings of a piano to alter its sound. This technique transforms the instrument’s timbre and creates a unique percussive effect. He often used graphic notation, which represents music through visual symbols outside traditional music notation, to allow performers greater interpretive freedom.

Cage’s early use of electronic elements and taped music laid the groundwork for future developments in electronic and experimental music. Meanwhile, his collaborations with choreographer Merce Cunningham and visual artists like Robert Rauschenberg and Jasper Johns helped blur the lines between music, visual art and performance art, and encouraged artists to integrate sound and music into their visual pieces. Bands like The Velvet Underground and Sonic Youth, known for their experimental approaches to rock music, have cited Cage’s influence.

***

Avant-garde works, like Cage’s, challenge traditional boundaries and conventions, pushing the limits of their respective art forms. These works require audiences to engage in new and sometimes uncomfortable ways, fostering a more reflective experience. By embracing innovation and experimentation, avant-garde artists continue to expand the possibilities of creative expression and challenge audiences to rethink their perceptions of art.

Rejecting traditional harmony, avant-garde music frequently employs atonality, dissonance and complex rhythms. Also, avant-garde compositions often eschew traditional forms and structures, opting instead for more fragmented, episodic or free-form designs. Avant-garde music frequently incorporates unconventional techniques and methods, such as extended instrumental techniques, new uses of electronics and experimental sound production.

The avant-garde in dance tends to focus on abstract movement rather than narrative storytelling, exploring the body’s capabilities and relationships with space and time. Many avant-garde dance works integrate other art forms, such as visual arts, music and technology, to create a multimedia experience. Avant-garde dance frequently takes place in nontraditional spaces, breaking the barrier between performer and audience.

Meanwhile, avant-garde opera regularly incorporates cutting-edge technology, such as video projections, electronic music and digital manipulation of voices and instruments. Featuring nonlinear, fragmented or abstract narratives, works like John Adams’s “Nixon in China” challenge traditional operatic storytelling. Avant-garde opera composers frequently experiment with new vocal techniques and sounds, expanding the expressive range of the human voice.

Avant-garde theater often seeks to break down the barrier between actors and audience, encouraging interaction and engagement. Like avant-garde opera, these works frequently employ nonlinear storytelling, fragmented plots and episodic structures. In addition, the innovative use of space, lighting and set design, in a bid to create more immersive or disorienting experiences, are hallmarks of avant-garde theater.

Among the arts’ biggest challenges is attracting an audience to avant-garde performances in music, dance, opera and theater. These works, unfortunately, are often perceived as elitist or overly intellectual, alienating potential audiences who feel they lack the necessary knowledge or background to appreciate them.

The unconventional structures, dissonant harmonies and abstract narratives typical of avant-garde works can be difficult for audiences accustomed to more traditional forms. Some avant-garde pieces prioritize intellectual exploration over emotional connection, which can leave audiences feeling disconnected.

Is it possible to overcome public aversion to the avant-garde and win over a reluctant audience? Can the arts bridge the divide between artistic innovation and public perception and engagement? If so, how might this be done?

The visual and performing arts may not be able to make the unfamiliar familiar or comfortable, but they can take steps to turn controversy into curiosity and skepticism into fascination and encourage audiences to embrace the bold, the new and the innovative.

***

I recently witnessed an example of how to do this. “A Thousand Thoughts” is a live documentary with the Kronos Quartet, written and directed by Sam Green and Joe Bini. The quartet performs live alongside live narration, archival footage and filmed interviews with such prominent composers and performers as Philip Glass, Paul McCartney, Aleksandra Vrebalov, Tanya Tagaq, Steve Reich, Wu Man and Terry Riley.

For half a century, the Kronos Quartet has been at the forefront of efforts to introduce audiences to diverse, new and cutting-edge music. Founded in 1973, the quartet has commissioned over 1,000 new works and arrangements, making the group pivotal in expanding the string quartet repertoire with contemporary compositions. Known for their eclecticism, the musicians perform music that spans classical, jazz, rock, Indigenous and world music, broadening the appeal of the string quartet format.

A Kronos performance offers a fantastic model of how to make the musical leading edge accessible to a broader audience. The mixture of live performance, video and the spoken word, as well as the intensely personal revelations (for example, about family deaths and the replacement of quartet members) are profoundly moving. Nothing comes across as overly abstract and academic. Even the most “far-out” pieces, like those involving throat singing (found among the Inuit, Japan’s Ainu ethnic group, and in India, Sardinia and Tibet), proved to be particularly exciting.

I’d like to suggest that the Kronos concert illustrates strategies to attract a larger, more diverse audience to avant-garde works.

By combining the musical performance with vivid TED-talk like explication, the program helps demystify these works and provides audiences with the context needed to appreciate them. An interactive and immersive multimedia performances engages the audience directly and makes avant-garde works more accessible and enjoyable.

Also, mixing avant-garde pieces with more traditional works in a single program introduces avant-garde art in a more familiar context. Then, too, highlighting the cultural relevance of leading-edge works, and explaining how these address contemporary social, political, and cultural issues helps make the pieces resonate more deeply with the audience.

***

The Kronos Quartet was named, accidentally and unintentionally, after the leader of the Titans in Greek mythology, the youngest son of Uranus (sky) and Gaia (earth) and the father of Zeus, Hera, Poseidon, Hades, Demeter and Hestia.

According to Greek mythology, Kronos (also known in English as Cronus) presided over the Golden Age, the period of peace and prosperity when human beings lived in harmony and abundance. Warned that one of his children would overthrow him, Kronos devoured his children at birth, but one, Zeus, survived and led a rebellion against the Titans. Zeus ultimately forced Kronos to regurgitate his siblings, leading to the rise of the gods on Mount Olympus.

The myth of Kronos, like many other Greek legends, sheds light on lots of timeless concerns. These include the cyclical nature of power, the inevitability of generational conflict, and the tension between fate and free will. From these myths, we also learn about the tendency of cycles of violence and retribution to perpetuate themselves and the self-fulfilling nature of prophecy, born out of fear and paranoia.

I personally learned a lot from Greek myths, and even today, among my most treasured possessions is a fraying copy of Marion N. French’s Myths and Legends of the Ages, a hand-me-down from a cousin. Published in 1956 and widely read by my fellow Baby Boomers, this collection of Greek, Roman, Norse and Chinese myths was noteworthy for excluding Biblical tales.

Whatever you think about calls from social conservatives to recenter K-12 education around the so-called classical curriculum (that is, Western culture), I consider it a shame that my students are almost as unfamiliar with Greek mythology as they are with avant-garde dance, music, opera and theater.

I have no doubt that my generation took away a host of valuable insights into human nature, emotions and morality from those myths, which contrasted sharply with the lessons taught in the Sunday schools that a majority of Baby Boomers attended.

For one thing, the Greek gods are depicted with human flaws, emotions and moral ambiguities. They are capricious, vindictive and driven by personal desires and vendettas. Zeus, for example, is powerful but prone to infidelity and jealousy – unlike the God of the Bible, who is depicted as omnipotent, omniscient and morally perfect.

Human-divine interactions in these myths often result in tragic transformations and punishments. Mortals are frequently the victims of divine whims, like Arachne, who Athena turns into a spider. These interactions emphasize the unpredictable and often unjust nature of the gods. In contrast, human-divine interactions in the Old and New Testament are based on covenants and moral imperatives. God’s actions towards humanity are depicted as part of a divine plan aimed at justice, redemption and reconciliation.

The Greek myths also reveal a wide range of emotions such as love, jealousy, revenge and ambition, and illustrate how these emotions drive behavior and shape consequences. The story of Achilles, driven by pride and rage, reveals the destructive potential of unchecked emotions.

The moral lessons in Greek mythology are often ambiguous. Although the myths frequently depict the consequences of hubris, jealousy and revenge, they do not provide clear moral guidance, unlike the Bible, which provides explicit moral teachings and commandments. The Ten Commandments, the Beatitudes and Jesus’s parables, offer clear guidelines on how to live a righteous life based on principles of justice, love and obedience to God's will.

The treatment of gender in Greek mythology is especially complex and ambiguous. While many myths reflect a male-dominated society, others showcase powerful female figures who possess considerable influence, autonomy, intelligence and resourcefulness.

Although The Greek pantheon is dominated by male gods such as Zeus, Poseidon and Hades, who hold supreme authority over the sky, the sea and underworld, and while many Greek myths center around male heroes and relegate women to secondary roles, either as helpers or hindrances to the male protagonists, other myths emphasize female agency and influence.

To be sure, there are many portrayals of goddesses, such as Hera, who are jealous and vengeful. Yet, several female deities possess considerable power and autonomy. Athena, the goddess of wisdom and war, is a key figure in many myths, known for her strategic prowess and assistance to heroes like Odysseus. Artemis, the huntress, is often depicted as fiercely independent and protective of her chastity, while Hecate is revered as a powerful deity of magic and the underworld.

Without exposure to the Greek myths, our students are deprived of important lessons about heroism, vanity, revenge, love and justice. By introducing the young to supernatural powers and fantastical creatures and presenting them with various ethical dilemmas and the consequences of human actions, these myths stimulate both the creative and moral imagination.

***

I, perhaps like you, love traditional pieces of music, with their emphasis on tonal harmony, symmetrical rhythms and meters, strict structural conventions, and clear key progressions. I find a lot of modern atonal compositions, with their complex rhythms and irregular meters and their emphasis on chance, repetition, or minimalism and unconventional instruments and playing methods, challenging to listen to.

However, the great works of avant-garde music speak to our time in ways that more traditional music doesn’t.

Avant-garde music pushes the boundaries of traditional music, encouraging listeners to think beyond conventional structures and harmonies. New techniques and sounds broaden our auditory palette and appreciation for the complexity and creativity involved in music-making. Also, avant-garde music mirrors the chaos, fragmentation and diversity of modern life.

In addition, it evokes the complexities of contemporary existence and stimulates a wide range of emotions, from discomfort to exhilaration. This emotional journey can be cathartic and enlightening, helping listeners explore and understand their own emotional landscapes. Because engaging with avant-garde music requires active listening and mindfulness, it can enhance listeners’ ability to stay present and focused, fully experiencing the moment, which is indispensable in today’s distraction-filled world.

I should add that avant-garde music usually incorporates elements from various cultures and traditions, promoting a greater appreciation for cultural diversity. As a critical chapter in music’s history, avant-garde music fosters a deeper appreciation for the entire musical canon and its development over time.

Colleges should encourage their students to explore the avant-garde landscape and the artistic frontier. In the works played by the Kronos Quartet and similar ensembles, they will hear the echoes of the future.

Steven Mintz is professor of history at the University of Texas at Austin and the author, most recently, of The Learning-Centered University: Making College a More Developmental, Transformational, and Equitable Experience.

Next Story

Written By

Found In

More from Higher Ed Gamma