Views

Despite the negative connotations they incite, they have exactly the kind of insight and persistence that higher ed needs today, argue M. Soledad Caballero and Aimee Knupsky.

Jonathan Zimmerman considers the late writer's fiction and nonfiction on the subject.

A new report leaves Jim Jump wondering if low-income students can still find the money to pay for public higher education.

If nothing else, we should offer a deeper and more meaningful connection to our institutions than sitting for hours in a sports arena, waiting to hear one's name called, argues Jonathan Beecher Field.

Doctoral admissions needs reform, but not the end of testing, writes David G. Payne.

The struggle between piety and libido in the age of mechanical reproduction is at the core of Amy Werbel's Lust on Trial: Censorship and the Rise of American Obscenity in the Age of Anthony Comstock, writes Scott McLemee.

Most public universities are no longer affordable for low-income students, writes Carrie Warick, leaving few financially safe options for applicants.

Calls to create a discipline around the term risk reinforcing existing problems with how it is used -- and misused -- in higher education, Rolin Moe writes.