Views

Scott Dalrymple considers the gap between anti-intellectualism and higher education, and how to bridge it.

The greatest threat to the SAT is test security, writes Jim Jump.

Scholars should speak out against those who have weaponized the language of “safety,” “security,” “acknowledgment” and “inclusion” to silence anyone who disagrees with them, argues Peter Wood.

Avital Ronell's new book, Complaint, is not really about the recent harassment case, writes Scott McLemee. At the same time, it’s not exactly not about it.

The case of Michael Kimmel, argue Kris Macomber and Matt Ezzell, raises two crucial questions: What makes holding powerful men accountable so difficult, and where do we go from here?

Amid the hype, the technology really does have major implications for higher education research, accountability and credentials, Daniel Pianko writes.

A lawsuit joined by the U.S. Justice Department distorts the way admissions works, writes Julie J. Park.

In the future, we won't be able to sidestep the ethical and policy issues linked to the use of technology, writes Lynn Pasquerella, so we must confront the question of how we best prepare students for it.