Views

Scott McLemee discusses Matthew Rose’s A World After Liberalism: Philosophers of the Radical Right with the author.

David Soo outlines what Secretary of Education Miguel Cardona’s higher education innovation agenda should look like.

Stanford’s first-year program revives the concept of a shared curriculum without reigniting battles over Western civ and literary canons, Dan Edelstein writes in a response to Mark Bauerlein.

The humanities are thriving at science and technology–oriented universities, Richard Utz writes in a response to Mark Bauerlein.

It’s often impossible to tell how graduates of online programs fare, Robert Kelchen writes.

The peer-assessment system favors institutions that have done well for decades, write John Barnhill and Joe O’Shea.

Higher ed must stand against the real threats to free expression—the raft of legislation targeting the teaching of “divisive concepts,” Patricia McGuire writes.

In view of the “cancel culture” discourse, Jim Ryan and Ian Baucom of the University of Virginia write that universities should train students to be empathetic speakers and generous listeners.