Views

Science papers are the right place to talk about the supremacist history of science, Clara del Junco writes.

Is it ethical to withhold the data? Jim Jump considers the issues.

Maureen E. Ruprecht Fadem writes of the assault on the humanities, the battle in and outside the classroom with false knowledges, and the imperative to engage publicly with well-researched truths.

Scott McLemee discusses Matthew Rose’s A World After Liberalism: Philosophers of the Radical Right with the author.

David Soo outlines what Secretary of Education Miguel Cardona’s higher education innovation agenda should look like.

Stanford’s first-year program revives the concept of a shared curriculum without reigniting battles over Western civ and literary canons, Dan Edelstein writes in a response to Mark Bauerlein.

The humanities are thriving at science and technology–oriented universities, Richard Utz writes in a response to Mark Bauerlein.

It’s often impossible to tell how graduates of online programs fare, Robert Kelchen writes.