News, Views and Careers for All of Higher Education
March 1, 2006
In theory, I send out my “Successful Academic” newsletter every other week. In practice, I skipped January this year. I was Absent WithOut Leave (AWOL) from late December until late February. In the military, this unexcused two-month absence would be grounds for court martial.
Fortunately, my newsletter readers have not been punitive. No one has taken me to task, much less to trial. The busy academics who subscribe to my newsletter have probably not even noticed its absence. Yet, as I returned to regular publishing schedule, I longed to resume with a zinger of a story, one that would make my readers exclaim, “These tips were certainly worth the wait.” The longer I procrastinated the more grandiose my goals became. As January slipped into February, it got more and more difficult to sit down and write.
How had it become such a chore to produce a few paragraphs of academic advice? A military quote came to mind as I battled with my own resistance: General Norman Schwartzkopf once said, “The truth of the matter is that you always know the right thing to do. The hard part is doing it.”
How true. And while wallowing in guilt at my own delay, my mind wandered to the many academics who go AWOL. I thought about graduate students who avoid campus to hide out from advisors, the professors who leave advisee e-mail unanswered, the peer reviewers who neglect reading manuscripts they’ve agree to refereee, the research collaborators who delay returning phone calls, and the purported authors of book chapters who ignore frantic pleas from colleagues compiling edited volumes. AWOL academics are rampant. Late manuscripts are endemic.
These disappearing acts lead to pernicious cycles. The longer you are out of touch with someone, the more difficult it feels to resume contact. The more you worry about resuming contact, the higher your standards become for the promised project.
AWOL cycles seem to occur most often between graduate students and their advisors. The avoidance usually begins when the student promises a piece of the dissertation by a certain date.
“I’ll have the first draft of my proposal to you by the end of January,” said one graduate student I work with to her professor. The deadline passed and the student resolved to get in touch as soon as the draft was finished. She told me that she was too embarrassed to send him an e-mail without the promised attachment. Weeks passed, and guilt over the missed deadline increased her belief that the manuscript needed to be “really, really good” to make up for being late. Intensified anxiety and heightened expectations led to difficulty working. She spent more time polishing old sections than writing new ones. Writer’s block set in. Right now, the proposal feels further from completion than ever.
I also see professors go AWOL. For example, a few weeks ago, one of my clients confessed with great guilt that he had told a journal editor that he would resubmit a revised draft of his article by September. So far, he’s had difficulty reading the comments, much less picking which of the many changes to tackle. Although he hasn’t begun the statistics analyses that will be needed to tweak the results section, he does wake up in the middle of the night with bad bouts of overdue manuscript angst.
Going AWOL may lead to almost comical extremes of guilt-laden avoidance. Graduate students avoid the halls of their department. Professors consider skipping conferences for fear of running into colleagues. Requests for reimbursement never reach the desks of administrators who could process a check. Manuscripts are never resubmitted despite generally favorable reviews. Time passes. Meanwhile, almost half of all graduate students never defend their dissertations. Many adjuncts never get full-time academic jobs. Some faculty members never get tenure.
But the state of AWOL can be avoided or overcome. And the first step is to do an “About Face!”
If you’ve ever been missing in action, you know that the longer you’ve been gone, the harder it becomes to work on that late project. What can you do to break the cycle of avoidance and delay?
How Can You Return Gracefully From Being AWOL?
1. Realize that your absence weighs heavier on your mind than the other person’s. Advisors are not losing sleep over late dissertation proposals and journal editors aren’t agonizing over missing manuscripts. The project is more important to you than anyone else.
2. Remember, when you do get in touch, the person is unlikely to be angry and punitive. We tend to be much harsher about our own tardiness than we are about other people’s delays. Advisors know it is difficult to write dissertation drafts. Journal editors are accustomed to academics who take a long time to turn around R&R manuscripts.
3. Lower rather than raise your standards when you’re running late. Don’t try to make your work more polished to make up for taking so long. Just try to get something sent out for feedback. End the cycle by chanting to yourself “A done dissertation is a good dissertation” or “A published paper is the only paper that counts.”
4. Get in touch even before you have the “completed product” ready for review. Try to get in touch as soon as you know that you are going to miss the deadline. Let the person know that you are working on your project. Facing your fear of the other person’s disapproval and re-establishing contact, will help lower your anxiety so that you can get back to work
5. Beware of setting deadlines you won’t be able to meet. If you are running late with a project, and you decide to resume contact, try not to set yourself up for another failure. Don’t tell your advisor or an editor “I’ll have it to you by next week.” Instead, tell the person what you’ve already accomplished, explain what you still need to work on, and say that you’ll have it to them as soon as possible. If appropriate, ask the person if they’d like to review what you’ve written so far.
6. Sidestep going AWOL in the first place. Set up a meeting with your advisor with the plan of having the entire proposal done. If you realize, a few days before the meeting, that a complete draft won’t be possible, ask whether you can turn in an incomplete draft annotated with specific questions you have about the gaps. If a journal editor asks for an estimated date for the revision, reply that you’ll try to return the manuscript within a month unless there are unforeseen problems. Then, if glitches arise, you can contact the editor with a revised estimate of completion. Give yourself some leeway. If you tend to run late, you might want to adopt the policy of “don’t ask don’t tell”: many academics I work with volunteer deadlines even when it is unnecessary to do so. Perhaps you should keep your completion goals to yourself.
7. Take extra steps to avoid AWOL when your absence will affect others. If you are late with a dissertation chapter or a single-authored journal article it usually only hurts you. But when you are late with a group project, going AWOL has consequences for your colleagues. Put special effort into promptness in these cases. For example, when you are writing a chapter for an edited volume, be sure to keep in touch with the editor. Most savvy academics set their deadlines for chapters a couple of months early, because people are notoriously late. Try, however, not to be the laggard who holds up publication. Being late damages your reputation and reduces your credibility. If you’re delinquent, you may not be asked to contribute again.
8. Assume a matter-of-fact stance when you get back in touch with people. Don’t be overly apologetic when you return from AWOL. A polite but professional tone is usually appropriate. Almost everyone goes AWOL sometimes, and even those punctilious people who are never tardy have to interact on a daily basis with the vast majority of us who are less prompt. No one is shocked by missed deadlines. This is not to say that you should be glib about it. Apologize just don’t belabor the point. You’re late. You’re sorry. You’re now doing your best to complete the project.
9.Try a “practice run” before clicking on the send button. I often advise coaching clients to write a draft of a difficult email without typing in the address to prevent sending an unfinished message accidentally. Often, clients report that once they’ve drafted a short ‘hello’ it feels surprisingly easy to send the email.
10. Keep in mind that even if you get a negative reaction when you revive contact, at least you’ve faced your dread of the unknown. Anticipating how the other person may respond to your missed deadline can feel like a black hole of potential admonishment. Even if your advisor or colleague is angry, at least you can begin to repair the relationship rather than allow resentment to fester. Get in touch and get it over with. You are likely to experience relief.
What Happens When You Return From Being AWOL?
The outcome is usually better than you anticipate.
Dissertation advisors are accustomed to late drafts and usually react with understanding and support. I recently convinced a graduate student I work with to get back in touch with her dissertation chair, even though it had been six months since they’d been in touch, and she still hadn’t completed the dissertation chapter she’d promised him for October.
“I’m still struggling with the chapter,” she wrote to him in an email. “May we meet to discuss the areas where I’m stuck? Would it be helpful to see a partial draft before we get together?”
She was pleasantly surprised by his response. He told her that glad he was to hear from her and set up a meeting for that week. A few days before their appointment, she e-mailed the “disastrous mess” and was very surprised that he thought many of her ideas were clear and on target. His generous response relieved her anxiety, and bolstered her self-esteem, making it much easier to sit down and write.
If you have the type of dissertation chair who says, in effect, “Don’t bother me until you have a polished draft,” then get help from someone else. Seek early feedback from a dissertation group, or a talented friend in the department, or even a hired editor. Don’t endlessly agonize over revisions. Get external feedback and move on.
Journal editors are used to R&R papers that never reappear. At my suggestion, the junior faculty member with the late R&R manuscript sent a short e-mail to the journal editor.
“I’m sorry that we were unable to resubmit manuscript X this fall,” he wrote “but this month my colleagues and I have carved out the time to make the revisions. Do you need the article by a certain time in order to place it in an issue focused on a specific topic?”
The journal editor responded that he’d be glad to see the manuscript as soon as it was completed and that it was not targeted for a specific journal issue. Relieved the article would still be considered for publication, my client was able to face looking at the comments of the reviewers and sort through which suggestions were necessary, optional and unreasonable. He also contacted his co-authors and asked for help in answering the complicated critiques of the reviewers. After some arm-twisting, his colleagues have agreed to tackle some of the changes, and he no longer feels so overwhelmed by requested revisions.
What Is the Most Important Result of Returning From AWOL?
Ending your state of AWOL reduces anxiety, breaks down writer’s block, and lifts the burden of guilt. Getting back in touch with the people you’re avoiding has obvious career benefits. However, perhaps the most important payoff is the increased mental energy released by resuming contact. Author and time management expert Kerry Gleeson writes: “This constant, unproductive preoccupation with all the things we have to do is the single largest consumer of time and energy.” Return from AWOL and you’ll get back mental energy that can be better applied elsewhere.
Another well-known efficiency expert, David Allen, uses the felicitous term “psychic RAM” for the mental space taken up by the “shoulds” and “to dos” that haunt us. When you are worried about the repercussions of being AWOL, it sucks up mental and emotional energy from more productive preoccupations. Fortunately, you can free up “psychic RAM” by erasing the nagging guilt of being AWOL. Renewed vigor is the result of facing the person you’ve avoided. Get back in touch and it will be easier to get back to work.
If you are AWOL right now, why don’t you try an “About Face!” Return that phone call. Answer that email. Knock on your advisor’s office door. Stop polishing that manuscript and send it out. You’ll be glad you returned to duty.
Want it on paper? Print this page.
Know someone who’d be interested? Forward this story.
Want to stay informed? Sign up for free daily news e-mail.
Advertisement
There’s nothing startlingly new in this article, but it’s written so well and comprehensively, with such sensitivity on the part of the author, that it’s hard to get defensive about a trait you (I) consider negative in your(my)self.
Sound advice, too. Putting the puppy back on the paper is one of the most valuable skills I’ve been learning in the last several years as a graduate student and a large-project director.
Thanks for this.
Vika Zafrin, Brown University, at 8:50 am EST on March 1, 2006
my fave from my undergrad days was “done is better than good.”
simone eastman, at 10:45 am EST on March 1, 2006
Just wonderful, Coach! About to link to this right now.
Yvette, PhD candidate at University of Minnesota, at 10:45 am EST on March 1, 2006
Having been “on the other side of this issue” more times than I can count, I have only two friendly complaints about Mary McKinney’s advice.
Item 2: While I am hardly ever angry and never punitive, I am often annoyed ... and sometimes I’m reeeeeally annoyed. That is especially so when I’m the “middle man” and my colleague’s (I consider all students to be colleagues) output is my input ... and a third party is expecting my output. If my colleague is going AWOL, so be it. But when her doing so makes me go AWOL, that’s another matter altogether.
I always take responsibility for my actions in those cases, but ...
Item 3: Mine is not a reasoned response to this point; it’s just my unconscious operating style. I also recall Simone Eastman’s “done is better than good” from my undergraduate days, and there it was not such a bad idea. But, as a matter of “personal style,” whenever I am AWOL, I make sure the completeness and quality of my output is waaaay more than the recipient is expecting. I do that because I know the worst of the worst for me is getting something from a colleague that is both late and mediocre (less than I expected). I mean, what’s the point? Certainly my expectations in those cases add to everything that makes being AWOL nerve wracking ... but I think I can’t change my expectations because I don’t want to change them.
For advisors, clearly defining and segmenting advisee’s tasks and then helping them manage the time available is not that big a deal ... especially for those who have a history of going AWOL (as anyone who does remodeling jobs will tell you, always increase the “expected” time by 50%).
In truth – and I know we want to keep this to a minimum – sometimes the “solution” to being AWOL is to simply walk away from the task altogether ... and then run for president a few years later.
I love that old saying, “Anything worth doing is worth doing badly.” I have always considered it a personal flaw that I could not feel comfortable with that concept.
RWH, at 7:40 am EST on March 2, 2006
I didn’t have these problems in graduate school, or even early on in my professor days, but later spent years in the AWOL doldrums. Why: (a) a book contract I considered too much of a coup to turn down. I wanted to take the project in a different direction than the press did, and didn’t yet have enough faith in myself to say so. I accepted the contract, but then found I couldn’t work on the project without having my brain fog over; (b) a shrink who thought academic success was a symptom of emotional disturbance. Having both of these things happen at the same time was confusing, I became BLOCKED. I even went so far as to move to a teaching school because I couldn’t write any more and didn’t know why. I then spent lots of time and money trying to figure out what was going on, and ultimately wrote a manifesto for myself which essentially says what this one does, although not as well. BUT it worked. Finally. Although I wish the time and energy I spent figuring out what was going on and how to deal with it had gone into research and creative work. It would have done me and a few other people a whole lot more good. So I hope everyone, everyone reads your piece.
Professor Zero, at 11:20 am EST on March 2, 2006
RWH has some valid points too! It is one thing to get a late course paper which turns out to be mediocre. You just grade it, and it’s gone.
It is another thing to have a dragging thesis or dissertation student, especially if they expect to graduate despite the fact that they are dragging. I’ve noticed that these dragging graduate students tend to fall into one of two categories: those who don’t realize that they can legitimately ask their thesis or dissertation director for more advice and guidance than they are, and those who expect their director to take them by the hand as though they were undergraduates. Dissertation time is a great time to act like an adult: make your own (informed) decisions, know when you need advice or direction, and have the guts to ask for it.
Then there are the colleagues who are AWOL from collaborative research work, or, often yet more disruptively from routine administration and service. YES, it is thenreally pointless to receive a late AND poorly conceived, poorly written document.
Finally, it’s also true that if there’s something you keep going AWOL from, perhaps the issue is, you need to be working on a different project. That was my own problem when I went AWOL, and it took me years to see it.
Professor Zero, at 11:31 am EST on March 2, 2006
What happens when the ‘leave’ happens not because there is a deliverable that is missing but because a ‘hoop’ placed in one’s path by the institution has become an issue — and not one that involves the advisor or the direct part of the department? In many cases (and yes, my own, but I’ve been collecting others as I meet them) a pattern emerges — if the student hasn’t reached a point of having a topic/committee/advisor, there is noone to ‘bat’ for them at the admin level; at the same time, the hurdle prevents them from doing so. While the obstacle may not be one that is necessarily all that onerous standing alone, causing faculty and especially potential advisors to look askance, it tends to serve as a vicious kernel for the ‘deliverable AWOL’ problem. If there is an external factor of any kind which requires (or practically requires even if not officially) *some* form of faculty advice and guidance if not intervention, yet the student is unable to acquire said guidance/intervention due to faculty being unwilling to commit time/resources/political chips to someone who has not yet entered the dissertation ring, a locked loop occurs. The situation is exacerbated in an environment where the faculty is focused on producing academic (i.e. tenure-track) graduates, but the student may not have the same ambitions.
I freely acknowledge the personal frustration (and individual circumstances) vented in this post. I just wanted to point out that there are other mechanisms that amplify, if not create, the problems you mention here.
absentwithoutadvisor, at 3:30 pm EST on March 2, 2006
I absolutely agree with _both_ Mary McKinney’s advice _and_ the comments of RWH and Professor Zero, above, which I hope isn’t inconsistent.
On the one hand, there is nothing that makes you feel better than ceasing the persistent mental oscillations between “I should / I have to” and “I don’t want to / I can’t.” The _only_ thing that helps is to take that first small step in the direction of dealing with that huge weight of That Which You Are Procrastinating On. And then another, and another, till it’s done.
On the other hand, whenever you’re procrastinating, there is usually a reason — a reason that has nothing to do with your own character flaws. And it can help immensely to figure out what that reason is: What is it about this particular project that’s so distasteful? Is there any way to reimagine the project so as to make it more appealing? Or, as RWH suggests, to get out of it altogether with honor?
I spent far too many years beating myself up about not writing my dissertation. Finally I stopped all the self-loathing and thought, Okay, I hate this dissertation. I’ll also hate myself if I don’t finish my PhD. Is there any dissertation I could write that I wouldn’t hate? Now _that_ was a liberating question.
At that point it became merely (merely!) a matter of figuring out a new project, changing advisors, changing _fields_, even. But boy, was I _ever_ glad I did. I found a project that I really believed in and loved writing, and I’m very proud of everything I wrote. (Okay, I did still turn in some chapters rather late, but believe me it was nowhere near as bad.) As Professor Zero writes, you have to have enough faith in yourself to be honest about what you really want to do.
You are not the problem. The academic system is not the problem. (Though both surely _have_ problems.) The problem is the problem.
Unfortunately, some problems take a bit longer to solve than others — for instance, I hate grading student papers and always procrastinate on that. I’m certain I’m not alone in that. I want to figure out exactly what it is about grading student papers that I most hate and see if there’s any way I can structure my teaching so as to deal with it.
Until I’ve got that figured out, though, I should adopt the “back on duty” advice!
Finished dissertator, at 3:50 pm EST on March 2, 2006
Robert Boice’s little gem of a book, Professors as Writers, discusses many of these same issues, including the underlying perfectionism that is present in many such cases.
A. G. Rud, Purdue University, at 5:30 pm EST on March 2, 2006
I have never yet advised a dissertating student, only been one, so I might not know what I’m talking about, but I wonder whether the advisor of the AWOL grad student Mary McKinney discusses did the student such a favor by telling her that “he thought many of her ideas were clear and on target.” I myself received tons of similar encouragement and praise for the dissertation I finally, blessedly abandoned. It never helped for long. What was ultimately important was my own opinion of the thing.
The relief that the student felt (and that I used to feel in similar situations) is the relief of having her advisor be kind and understanding and accepting. But it’s possible to be kind and understanding and accepting and still advise a student to find a project or angle that she won’t think is a disastrous mess. The advisor’s opinion of the work doesn’t even really matter at that point.
Some students, of course, seem to think their work is great when it’s not. In that situation, the advisor’s opinion trumps the student’s — although kindness, understanding, and acceptance are still called for. But surely those overly confident students don’t go AWOL!
Finished dissertator, at 7:31 pm EST on March 2, 2006
Nice to read this! It’s such a relief to read that so many others procrastinate as much as I do that today I’ve settled right back into my own procrastinating ways. Only with less guilt!
Half the calories, tastes great!
willie mink, at 2:30 pm EST on March 3, 2006
I think this is an article that could REALLY benefit both advisees and advisors, if nothing else giving the two a common ground (or in this case, article) to meet on. I’m emailing this link (with my “effort to date” note and attachment) to my Prof, and saving the article to send to students someday when I’m on the other side of the desk...
AubreeAnn, Prof. Shattuc, are you reading?, at 5:15 pm EST on March 3, 2006
Yes. Trying to ’shake perfectionism’ and so on are mere distractions if the problem is the project itself—as opposed to ‘negative self-talk’ and so on. I spent today writing pieces of an article — didn’t go to the store, didn’t go to the gym, didn’t grade papers, didn’t do letters of recommendation, didn’t want to answer the phone — all because I liked the topic. This is truly key.
Professor Zero, at 4:40 am EST on March 5, 2006
Great article, Mary. I can use this advice personally, and I plan to send the article to my clients.
Gina Hiatt, Dissertation/Tenure Coach at Academic Ladder, at 7:45 pm EST on March 12, 2006
Hi again, coach, and thank you for _your_ kind comment on my Mardi Gras posts! I sent the URL of this piece to a procrastinating dissertator today, and linked to it in my blog. Then I wrote a blog post (today’s) that included this:
An anti-procrastination recipe. Remember taking exams? A good strategy is to start with the easiest portion, to warm up, and follow on with the hardest, before you’re tired. With that done, the rest is a well-tuned ride. Now, apply this to everything else. Of all the things you have to do, choose the most pleasant first, then go on to the least pleasant. After that, your day runs itself.
Professor Zero, at 4:40 am EST on March 15, 2006
Advertisement
or search for jobs directly.
This new position will exist to provide prevention education, training, and services related to interpersonal violence (IPV) ... see job
WEST VALLEY-MISSION COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT ACADEMIC PART-TIME EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY FOREIGN LANGUAGE Latin — Associate ... see job
The Faculty of Arts at UoW is experiencing an exciting period of growth and transformation. We’re reviewing major teaching ... see job
Empire State College’s Long Island Center (LIC) in Hauppauge, NY seeks applications for a full-time, tenure-track faculty ... see job
Join one of the finest regional universities in the nation. James Madison University, home to 18,000 + students, welcomes you ... see job
In the historic, coastal city of Charleston, the Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC) offers a wide range of ... see job
The Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics in collaboration with the UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center seeks ... see job
The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, School of Public Health has contracted with the United Arab Emirates (UAE) ... see job
Under the direction of the University Equal Opportunity/ADA Officer, the Assistant Equal Opportunity/ADA Officer will manage ... see job
Job Description: The Department Chairperson provides academic leadership to the Chemistry, Physics and Earth Science ... see job
I will get back to you sometime with my comments on this article. Maybe.
SP, at 7:10 am EST on March 1, 2006