Advertisement

Advertisement

News, Views and Careers for All of Higher Education

Words on Paper

So you’re still in graduate school, you’ve finished everything but your dissertation, and you’re facing a pretty bleak academic future. You’ve been warned of graduate student attrition, shrinking job markets, tenuous adjunct work, a long and painful journey on the tenure track, and recurring bouts of insecurity and depression. Such dire predictions don’t matter because you’ve invested too much time, effort, and money in graduate school to walk away without a guilty conscience. With so much discouraging news, how are you supposed to complete your dissertation?

As a former Ph.D. candidate at a major research university, I, like so many of you, have read, seen, and lived all the gloomy descriptions of academic life. I have questioned my past decisions and future plans, and at several points even contemplated calling the whole thing off.

Then, a funny thing happened at the end of one summer: I decided that I just needed to finish. Eight months later the dissertation was complete and gathering dust while I awaited an early-fall defense. From the whole process I learned certain lessons that, despite their helpfulness, didn’t strike me as information that many professors are willing or ready to share. So to other graduate students and, perhaps, faculty looking for a novel way to nudge their wards toward completion, I offer my secrets to finishing the dissertation.

The first great secret about finishing is that there is no great secret. In my case, I had no sudden burst of intellectual insight, nor did I happen upon the forgotten piece of scholarship that suddenly brought all my arguments together and cleared the road for completion. There were a few stretches of frenzied writing and excessive caffeine consumption during which I lost sleep and became, shall we say, not fun to be around.But it would be an unfair exaggeration to characterize the eight months that it took to complete the lion’s share of the writing as isolated and monkish toil. In fact, I held a part-time job throughout the whole process and even taught an upper-level course of about 35 students. In the plainest terms, I just plugged along.

It’s hard, though, to sit down and simply begin to write. After all, the dissertation isn’t just any piece of writing; it’s the capstone piece of scholarship that will summarize your entire educational history, rightfully earn you the highest of academic degrees, and define you as you take your first steps into the scholarly life. A dissertation is different from the 15- to 25- page seminar papers that you can now crank out in a weekend. Not only are the individual chapters two or three times longer than anything you’ve written for your classes, but they have to fit together into a larger project than anything you’ve ever conceived. It has to be great.

Which brings me to the second great secret of finishing your dissertation: Stop telling yourself that the dissertation has to be great, that it has to redefine your field, that it has to be such a wonderful piece of scholarship that you will be able to trigger a bidding war between publishers the day after your defense. A dissertation doesn’t have to be great. It doesn’t even have to be good; it just has to be good enough.

If you need to be convinced of this, don’t go to your department mailroom and peruse the dissertation propped on a stand — that’s the one that garnered a dissertation-year fellowship from the university, won the “Dissertation of the Year” award from a national scholarly organization, and landed its author a plum tenure-track position at Big Time U. Instead, take a brief trip to the forgotten corner of the library that houses those somber rows of black volumes stamped with years and last names. Flip through a few of the thicker ones that seem remotely related to your discipline. Read their tables of contents. Skim their opening chapters. While there are sure to be some diamonds in the rough, for the most part you’ll find that few dissertations qualify as great writing. Even if you miss some of the stinkers, you’ll come across a number that leave you muttering, “Wow, I can do better than this.”

You see, while second-guessing their own arguments and puzzling over whether vaguely-worded suggestions from a faculty member represent incisive comments or off-the-cuff and undeveloped thoughts, many Ph.D. students, including at one point myself, forget that they are already expert enough in a subject to produce a manuscript that will satisfy their committee. That’s not to say that they can dump any argument on paper provided it stretches to 250 pages; instead, I merely suggest that they already know enough information and are familiar enough with at least the most significant works in a particular area of scholarship to put together a sizable and relatively original piece of work within that area. Of course, that work will be subjected to committee members’ comments and criticism, but such criticism tends to grow more particular in focus as the larger project begins to coalesce.

You need, then, to complete something and get it in your committee members’ hands. How do you do that in the quickest and most efficient manner possible? The answer is my third and, I confess, my favorite secret: words on paper.

Try repeating it. “Words on paper...Words on paper.” It sounds simple enough. Say it a few more times. It feels good, doesn’t it? It starts to sound like a chant, a motto, or mantra. It’s almost like reverse meditation — instead of repeating “om” or “one” to empty your mind of all thought and action, you repeat “words on paper” to reign in your wandering thoughts and commit to writing.

What do you write? Well, almost anything. The point is simply to sit down and write. Even the most accomplished and prolific novelists, short story writers, and essayists often begin their day with a writing exercise. Except for a handful of manic geniuses out there — and even the quality of their work will probably be disputed — heavy revision is the norm of composition, not the exception. You may set down some positively horrendous prose, but you will also express some of your arguments and provide you and your committee something tangible to work with and develop.

If all that is not enough to help you trudge through your final task as a Ph.D. student, I have this one final bit of advice that is either hopelessly pessimistic or brutally honest, depending on your point of view: nobody is really going to care about what you write.

Recall again those past dissertations that you glanced at in the library. How many of their authors’ names are still on the tip of the tongue in scholarly circles? How many fewer are remembered for the particular piece of work that you flipped through? In writing a dissertation, you only have to satisfy your adviser and readers to the point that they sign off on it, after which it will be bound and stashed away in the library. Even if you view your dissertation as the first step towards a future career and hope to publish it as a book, you should realize that most dissertations are revised substantially before they’re suitable for publication. Despite its length, it is simply not the equivalent of a book. What’s left is nothing more or less than a graduation requirement.

This all sounds incredibly cynical.Readers out there will respond to my comments with a vigorous defense of the virtues of research and scholarly curiosity. They may even rightfully point out that my suggestions only fuel the deeper problems of a system that is leading students to produce timid, ponderous, and even unreadable dissertations. However, that is not students’ problem to fix. Until institutions and the profession as a whole address that problem and adjust their graduate curricula accordingly, graduate students will remain stuck in that system, and will have to play by its rules.

Just remember that pages here and elsewhere have been filled with anecdotes of graduate student burnout and dropout, and statistics that confirm the frequency of such disheartening experiences. For every student who finishes a graduate degree, there is another one that burns out or fades away, and if you’ve been around long enough, you’ve learned that a good many stumble when the time comes to write their dissertation.

Cease your soul searching, turn away from the ubiquitous warnings about the profession, and give up your lofty dreams of producing a work that will earn you a place in the annals of scholarly history. Stop second-guessing yourself, stop imagining that you are writing a book for future generations, and write.

It won’t be easy and it won’t be pretty, but eventually you will finish. Sure, some of your work may be unreadable, but other parts will surprise you at their quality, and will be more concise and polished than anything you ever expected. It won’t be perfect, it might not even be good, but it won’t matter. In the end, you’ll have words on paper and your degree in hand.

Brian Bialkowski is a senior writer/editor at Penn State. He received his Ph.D. in comparative literature from the University of Iowa in 2004. He has thought about revising his dissertation on hermeneutics, film adaptation, and Merchant Ivory into a book manuscript. Right now, though, he’s just happy it’s done.

Got something to say?


Want it on paper? Print this page.
Know someone who’d be interested? Forward this story.
Want to stay informed? Sign up for free daily news e-mail.

Advertisement

Comments

Commenting of Brian Bialkowski’s Article

Brian Bialkowski’s article on “Just Getting Your Dissertation Done” should be taken to heart, and hand, by every Ph.D. candidate. After my own experience in writing my dissertation in Philosophy (completed, at last, after 5 grueling years of research, writing, re-researching and re-writing, ad nauseum,) while concommitantly having a family, working a full-time job and adjunct teaching at several colleges at night, I am now convinced, was an over-extended, long-overdo and unnecessary adventure in premature aging as I descended into increasingly more depressive levels of Dantean Hell.I recall once spending three weeks agonizing over and revising one single sentence of my roughly 250 page dissertation. Sixteen words, of no special consequence or importance, in the overall scheme of a multi-thousand word disseration. Clearly, I was nuts, suffering, as do virtually all Ph.D. candidates, from the delusion that totally exhaustive scholarship, absolutely definitive verbal expression, and the sugar plum vision of creating an earthshaking magnum opus, was the wholly necessary sine qua non for a student truly worthy of receiving his Ph.D. degree. The aim of the dissertation exercise is to demonstrate professional competency; the goal is to sufficiency satisfy your team of examination professors that “you know your stuff” and can express it within those canons of methodological and jargonistic discourse, popular in that particular educational institution and this particular time in academia’s historical evolvement, so as to merit the Oz-ian Green Card of satisfactory fulfillment of your Department’s doctoral degree requirements. “JUST GET IT DONE” should be the motto and creed of every Ph.D. aspirant. Perfectionism is the psychic mechanism of an unrecognized cancer that metastasizes into the personal erosion that underlies self-unworthiness, dejection, depression, despair and all too many dropouts. Like water, genious finds its own level; for the overwhelming majority of human beings, even doctoral candidates, (and sometimes I think, especially doctoral candidates,) the high water mark of exeptional brillance and originality far exceeds mere excessive industriousness and diligence, and largely turns on inherent, perhaps even genetic, capability. Turn the tides of your own sucess by simply applying what you’ve been already taught and know, doing what needs to be done and banishing the idols of Nobel prize award thinking and just finish your dissertation. You’ve got an entire future ahead of you to ascertain and establish your professional legacy. Get it done and re-enter the world; academic and professional jobs are far too scarce to exhaust precious time in attempting to write the “perfect” dissertation. Heed Brian’s salutary advice, stop obsessing, get your degree and move on.

Percy Simon, Ph.D., On Finihsing your Dissertation, at 7:27 am EDT on September 6, 2005

Brian’s dissertation

Reminds me of the apt advice once offered by General George S. Patton: “A good plan executed violently today is better than a perfect plan executed tomorrow.”

Christopher Connell, at 9:05 am EDT on September 6, 2005

just a MA

I only earned an MA in the Humanities, but was fortunate to have a thesis advisor who taught me the value of the phrase, “Good enough!” So to those who struggle to complete creating the document of all documents, the words that will change the world, want to burn the MLA manual, and might be on the verge of calling a shrink; I say, learn this simple phrase. You may become under-employed, insane, and chew your nails to the quick from all that caffiene, but you will in the future—- waste less time on projects, have less tolerance for those who talk more than they type, and never care how old the computer was that helped you do IT! In addition, it may be possible to abolish that horrible inhuman word, “perfect,” or at least reduce the usage of it. Good enough for me, good enough for the readers I may never meet. Good enough for a world that could use a few eloquent thoughts, and if the quotation marks decide to go on the fritz while you are typing, well, choose another kind and keep on typing. Good enough!

ginger Edmiston, Good enough, at 11:49 am EDT on September 6, 2005

moving on

The advice my father got from his dissertation committee, that he passed on to me when it was my turn, was: “You should write the worst dissertation that ever passed and then get on with your life.” A year later, I wonder why I was so obsessed with a document that found its most popular use as a doorstop in my committee members’ offices

dan, ucla, at 3:15 pm EDT on September 6, 2005

Word from a former publisher

I am a former publisher and let me just reiterate Brian’s point: your dissertation hardly becomes a book as is. In fact, at my publishing house, it was standard practice to reject dissertations because, well, they “read like dissertations.” The ones we did pick to develop as books burdened the authors with another year or two of a complete rewrite. Hell, you’re more likely to be told to focus on just one of the chapters and turn that into a book. So, don’t fret, folks. Just write the darn thing and don’t imagine publihsers as an audience (we’re a rotten bunch anyway).

t, at 3:15 pm EDT on September 6, 2005

I’m surprised and depressed at this tacit acceptance of a dissertation tradition that is so manifestly corrupt. The faculty committees who accept this useless trash must be equally cynical.

Charles Muscatine, Ph.D., at 4:06 pm EDT on September 7, 2005

As one of the faculty members of Brian Bialkowski’s dissertation committee, I wanted to write to say I very much appreciate both his remarks and have oontinued to appreciate his beautifully written, provocative dissertation. I agree with others that his advice should be given to every graduate student wandering down the path of dissertation-life. However, his remark that professors are unwilling or infrequently share this advice hurts just a little bit. I give this advice to EVERY PhD student with whom I work, and I have some recollection of discussions along these lines with Brian. But, there is a big difference between giving “free” advice and people taking that advice! My experience in advising dissertation students is that the tips that Brian shares are often things that each individual has to discover for him or herself. Often, people aren’t ready to believe it when they first hear it, or the time is not yet right for them to hear it. The really important thing though is not how one gets the message but that one finally does. Thanks, Brian, for sharing your thoughts.

Lauren Rabinovitz, Professor of American Studies and Cinema, at 12:35 pm EDT on September 8, 2005

Oh, how I needed to hear the advice offered in this article. I am on the second draft of my first three chapters and have been struggling to keep going. This reminds me to “get it done” and not necessarily strive for perfection. My wife and son also thank you for your encouragement to finish the dissertation!

Matthew Upton, Ph.D. student and Director of Career Services at The Bush School, Texas A&M University, at 2:42 pm EDT on September 8, 2005

I just requested the extension of my already extended Ph.D. candidacy. “Words on Paper” reminds me of what one of my professors repeatedly told me. “The best dissertation is a DONE dissertation!”

sungjee bak, substitute assitant professor at Queens College, CUNY, at 7:59 pm EDT on September 8, 2005

the ever-popular “good enough” advice

. . . also known as the “best-dissertation-is-the-finished-dissertation” advice. Fine. I have long abandoned the perfectionism that threatened to extend my ABD status indefinitely. My committee, however, has not. To the prof concerned about corrupt dissertation processes, fear not—it’s far from universal, and my committee is on the offensive. I know quite a few ABDs who are taking longer than they should be, and none of them are striving for the elusive perfect dissertation—all of them are battling self-contradictory and/or unreasonably slow feedback from their committees. I’ve seen multiple versions of this advice for dissertation writers—how about some advice for dissertation committees?

Kotter, ABD, at 10:40 am EDT on September 9, 2005

I second Kotter’s point. We too often forget the role that faculty has. I have seen too many doctoral candidates delayed by insane committees. Many professors don’t do as they say. We may say “just get it done” but in practice we let drafts sit for months, sometimes years, unread. Or we’ll demand endless amounts of revision that reflect our professional insecurities rather than sound judgment. There have been cases where I have felt it was easier to get a dissertation approved than it is to get approval to immigrate from the INS. Every dissertation chair should just say out loud “this is good enough” and let the student move on with life.

As Lauren Rabinovtz says, people don’t heed the advice, and everyone has to discover it for themselves. But once they do, can’t we just get out of the way?

FR, at 6:02 am EDT on September 10, 2005

For every dissertation, there comes a time when the student asks his or her supervisor what is the least amount of additional work needed for completion. Idealistic grad students find this moment upsetting, but they need to recognize that it is inevitable. It is in everyone’s interest that it occur as early as possible during the process.

James W. Wetzler, PhD, at 10:56 am EDT on September 12, 2005

Sound advice, and what’s more, the author produced a normal, coherent thesis which further illustrates his point. How do I happen to know this? I stumbled on this piece while googling Brian Bialkowski — having just read his thesis!

Weightman, at 8:45 am EST on November 5, 2006

Advertisement

 Jobs Related to Words on Paper

or search for jobs directly.

2008/09 Term Faculty Series — Economics
University of Minnesota, Twin Cities

The University of Minnesota is a premier employer and a talent magnet attracting leading faculty and staff from around the ... see job

Assistant Professor in Strategic Communication: Public Relations
University of Minnesota, Twin Cities

The University of Minnesota is a premier employer and a talent magnet attracting leading faculty and staff from around the ... see job

Migration and Refugee Studies
American University in Cairo

About The American University in Cairo: Founded in 1919, AUC’s campus is currently located in Cairo, Egypt, but will be ... see job

STAFF ASSISTANT — Student Affairs/Registrar’s Office (31173)
Tufts University

The Registrar’s Office is a division of the Office of Student Affairs (OSA) of the Tufts University School of Medicine. The ... see job

RESEARCH ASSISTANT — John Hancock Center (32113)
Tufts University

Tufts University is partnering with Save the Children U.S. Programs to develop and implement a two-year nutrition and ... see job

Instructional Computer Designer
University of Idaho

Instructional Computer Designer Idaho Falls Center Open for Recruitment: August 19, 2008 — September 2, 2008 Announcement #: ... see job

Accounting Technician
University of Texas, Brownsville

To perform a variety of technical and clerical accounting duties involving the accounting, budgeting, recording and reporting ... see job

Chief Financial & Administrative Officer
University of California, Riverside

The University of California Riverside invests in your future through employee training and career development, access to ... see job

Development Director
University of Idaho

Development Director College of Engineering Open for Recruitment: June 11, 2008 — Open until further notice Announcement #: ... see job

Program Coordinator, Center for Excellence in Curricular Engagement
NC State University

Join the Pack! A community with nearly 8,000 faculty and staff, and 30,000 students. NC State is one of the largest employers ... see job