Advertisement

Advertisement

News, Views and Careers for All of Higher Education

The Pursuit of Efficiency and the Pursuit of Folly

Surveys have found that Americans hold great confidence in the nation’s public colleges and universities; a level shown to surpass even that held for churches, hospitals, the media and all levels of government. That’s good news. But beyond this general high level of confidence, the public seems, at times, deeply ambivalent about universities.

On one hand, there is a cherished and sentimental view of universities as academic places where caring teachers mold young minds through unhurried and probing conversations about poems and politics, the human condition and the forces of nature. In this utopia, a university’s classes are small, tutored by sage and patient scholars; juvenile errors and excesses are gently but firmly corrected; and, of course, football games are always won. And in this romanticized view, lush and leafy campuses are sanctuaries for eccentric intellectuals to think deep thoughts, develop whimsical theories, and indulge in the time-consuming trials and errors of research.

On the other hand, when talk turns to matters of state funding or, even worse, tuition, sweet sentimentalities are replaced by a fulminating call for universities to become ruthlessly efficient – no time or treasure squandered on small classes or idle contemplation or tending to pretty flowers on campus. Things must be run as “lean” as business would have us believe it has become. Fat must be excised, indolence must be punished mercilessly, unnecessary processes must be re-engineered and unnecessary people banished. Over-extended and under-funded state budgets have only served to increase the clamor for universities to become more frugal than friendly. And tax-phobic critics of state government spending, in particular, have elevated the no holds barred efficiency-as-a-mandate rhetoric.

The truth is, of course, that public universities are hardly strangers to frugality and regularly adopt efficiencies in countless ways. A recent study conducted by the American Association of State Colleges and Universities and SunGard Higher Education affirms that cost containment is a high priority and that institutions are turning to myriad sources and strategies to restrain spending.

As stewards of the public trust, university leaders and governing board members rightfully should be held accountable for maximizing the purchasing power of public monies. But focusing on efficiency as a prime goal and virtue can divert attention and effort from a university’s essential purpose — to protect and elevate its primary missions of teaching, learning, research and service.

Can a university be both academic and efficient, both humane and businesslike? The answer is a tentative “yes.” But this is a tricky business, for the very things that produce a university’s greatest value — intellectual freedom, personal attention to students, time for contemplation and the cultivation of imagination, conservation of our past and insight into our future, and the mistakes and missteps that necessarily precede achievements in research and learning — do not always conform to the imperatives of tidy management and steely cost-cutting techniques.

Universities are not manufacturing plants. While the raw material of business and industry often have predictable destinations, the raw material of universities — namely young or young-at-heart men and women — are subject to the great forces of human nature: ego and altruism, impulse and emotion, to name but a few. A piece of metal stamping on an assembly line cannot change its intentions to become a car door, a filing cabinet or a piece of art. A college sophomore, however, may very well alter his or her intended destination from being an accountant, to that of an English teacher, scientist, nurse, poet, parent or politician. What about the student who enrolls in a couple of extra courses that personally interest her, who therefore passes up the more direct route for her chosen degree and in the process delays graduation by a year? Higher education’s productivity auditors likely equate such dalliance with inefficiency. But what if in so doing, the student gained a clearer perspective of her life’s direction?

The cries for increased accountability and the reporting of metrics aimed at neatly calculating the return on public investment made to universities continue to increase. However, the output generated by universities is often difficult to quantify; not all efforts are calculable on a dollar-for-dollar return on investment basis.

Granting too much focus on the economic returns of higher education misses the point, for any attempt to quantify the contributions the collegiate experience makes in the everyday lives of citizens is much more of a qualitative than a quantitative endeavor. What about those programs and “products” that do not lend themselves to the orderly application of valued-added calculations? Few would question the value of university efforts in the info-bio-nano technologies, which invoke visions of cutting-edge products and services and spin-off commercial ventures. But what about programs in Middle Eastern studies? What’s the financial bottom line on a greater understanding of cultures in the Middle East? Programs of study on topics such as this surely do not serve as university profit centers. And what’s the value of a thoughtful term paper, or a stunning insight into the meaning of a historic event, or the value of a poem?

There is another, perhaps even greater, irony in all this. The evidence is not at all clear that “efficiency,” as commonly understood in business jargon, is in any way rewarded by the higher education “marketplace.” Imagine, for example, the least efficient institution of higher education in your state. Chances are that the teaching loads of its high-paid faculty are largely discretionary and barely measurable, with faculty efforts focused instead on the publication of esoteric thoughts in widely-unread journals; its library contains hundreds of thousands of volumes that haven’t been opened in decades; it has well manicured lawns and, probably, a facility that seats tens of thousands of people but is only used five or six Saturdays each year (hint–think football stadium). Imagine then, the most “efficient” higher education institution in your state. It likely has under-paid faculty with teaching loads that approach sweat-shop labor conditions; it may well be housed in a store-front; its library might be little more than a set of encyclopedias; and it is marketing hard for a student body that will keep it marginally solvent.

Now ... which one has accomplished students waiting with baited breath for word of a favorable admissions decision? Which one receives tens if not hundreds of millions of dollars in largesse from loyal alumni or proud donors each year? Which one commands the almost slavish allegiance of those very state legislators who cheer loudly from prime seats at athletic pageants but publicly threaten to discipline their spendthrift habits? Is “efficiency” — in a business definition — really recognized or rewarded in the higher education marketplace?

The fact is that not all efforts borne out of universities can be precisely summed up on some auditor’s balance sheet. Universities offer a different and much more complicated value proposition. Their “core business” is the development of human potential, their “products” are ideas and discoveries and the professionals who teach our children and treat our sicknesses and manage our businesses and create wealth and create art. Human beings are, alas, sometimes untidy, vexatious, troublesome; and humane values sometimes require more patience than might best serve some bottom line.

This is not a justification of waste or an excuse for wastrels. Universities should be expected to spend money sensibly. But in the rush to economize, even during hard times, we ought not lose sight of the primary value the public seeks and expects from our universities.

The reason universities have earned the public’s confidence, the reason hundreds and hundreds of thousands of alumni of our nation’s public universities are proud of their alma maters, the reason families sacrifice to send their sons and daughters to our campuses is not because universities function as well-oiled machines, not because they trim every expense and fill every idle minute during the academic day and year. It is because these unique and special and fragile institutions are there at the very instant when people, at their most promising and vulnerable moments, come seeking their futures, come ready to become something more, something better.

And as they become more, and better, so do we all.

Eric Gilbertson is president of Saginaw Valley State University. Daniel Hurley is director of state relations and policy analysis for the American Association of State Colleges and Universities.

Got something to say?


Want it on paper? Print this page.
Know someone who’d be interested? Forward this story.
Want to stay informed? Sign up for free daily news e-mail.

Advertisement

Comments

Living within one’s means

The author’s example of the least and most efficient institutions misses the point of the need for controlled spending. The purportedly “inefficient” institution that has all the frills can probably afford them. Otherwise it would be in a position where it had to control costs (like the purportedly “efficient” institution). Any college can go into massive debt to provide amenities, but they do so at the risk of going out of business if the gambit doesn’t pay off in increased revenue. Frankly, mediocre schools with mediocre revenue streams have to live within their means. The American public needs to do the same.

IHE Reader, at 7:35 am EDT on April 29, 2008

The U.S. dual public and private university systems must be contextualized and located within the US nation-state and its central ideological precept of market fundamentalism, which thrives on inequality and inequity.

How else can we explain the structural and systemic inequity between private university endowments and public university financing?

There’s something deeply unethical about a nation-state narrative in which Harvard’s private endowment is greater than the total operating budget to educate and provide services for 1 million children in more than 1100 schools in New York City.

We reside in a nation-state where many states and cities spend more on incarceration than on education; universities BOTH public and private are spaces that do NOT challenge in the public sphere a historically racialized inequity, most aptly described as Systemic Whiteness, within its own academic ranks and student enrollment; the practice of ‘legacy’ by the most prestigious private universities is de facto dynastic privilege.

The article sets up a safe, status-quo- preserving discourse about public university funding as being a problem of funding v. academic pursuits. I think that is a dismally distinctive ivory tower approach to a deeply structural problem that is starkly ideological and political.

Why should there be a two-tier higher ed system in the first place?

Why should the budget of the public higher ed system be smaller than that of the Pentagon?

The public university is uniquely a (potential) site of deliberative, contestational democracy. Let’s ask the tough questions and help shape the answers to those very questions in the public sphere, not only in safe classrooms behind ivied walls which replicate the power structure and worldview of the predatory, expansionist, inequitable U.S. nation-state.

Dr. Chithra KarunaKaran City University if New Yorkhttp://www.EthicalDemocracy.blogspot.com

Chithra KarunaKaran, at 9:30 am EDT on April 29, 2008

Special?

” .. It is because these .. special and fragile institutions are there at the very instant when people, at their most promising and vulnerable ..”

Psst! Every lobbying group in D.C. makes the same claim. And that the world will end if they don’t get 17% budget increase. But that darn old sun, it keeps rising, every day.

Nearly 40 years ago, a classics professor saw that working professionals were not being well-served by the “special” institutions of public academia. So, he borrowed his way to near-bankruptcy and provided them with “special” educational experiences.

That man was John Sperling, PhD. Founder, University of Phoenix.

Hard to believe, solutions are not always in D.C., or the state capital, or administrative offices with $700 Aeron chairs. I’m reminded of my friend’s uncle who was thrown out of MegaU for excessive partying — then donated his $5MM estate to MegaU. Was he “special?” Hmm ..

Frank, at 9:30 am EDT on April 29, 2008

The Education Business?

Most academics would agree that the purposes of a university include serving as a venue for rational and expert search for fundamental understanding (e.g., in philosophy or physics)or for consensus about an optimal course of action in light of currently available knowledge (e.g., in engineering or medicine). I have found that most people can be persuaded to agree that these purposes are similar to those of the executive, legislative, and judicial mechanisms of our democratic governments. It then follows that it makes as little sense to demand that a university should operate “just like a business” as it would to make the same demand of our national and local governments. For example, whatever else it may be, the current presidential electoral campaign is hardly a model of Prussian functional and financial efficiency. I will become more sympathetic to political demands for more business-like academic behavior as soon as I observe my government functioning exactly like Wal-Mart.

Don Langenberg, Chancellor Emeritus at University System of Maryland, at 10:45 am EDT on April 29, 2008

Dan Langenberg

Right you are. I would add that the current presidential electoral campaign serves a very important function: It’s a major distraction from things that matter.

The “Election Industrial Complex” indeed has more in common with Wal-Mart than with participatory democracy.

Walker Park Thatcher, at 1:25 pm EDT on April 29, 2008

BEEN THERE BEFORE

I agree with this analysis, and what makes the current ‘efficiency’ drive in higher education so silly is that it defies the evidence of its effects in earlier times, both in the USA and elsewhere.

A Quick read of ‘Education and the Cult of Efficiency’, Comparative Education, 34,3, 1998 shows the effects of previous efficiency movements in education — vocationalism, lower morale, loss of funds, a narrowing of the curriculum. In an era that is supposed to be about evidence-driven reforms, why is so litle attention paid to the evidence?

Tony Welch, Professor at University of Sydney, at 5:15 am EDT on April 30, 2008

Why So Little Attention to the Evidence?

Because it opens a space for the for-profits to step in and further accelerate the process. For profit. Did John Sperling perceive a need? Or a vulnerability within a “market niche"?

Walker Park Thatcher, at 8:40 am EDT on April 30, 2008

Inconvenient fact

” .. Did John Sperling perceive a need? Or a vulnerability within a “market niche"? (sic) ..”

Per previous post in IHE — Prof. Sperling (a regional faculty union official) stepped in after a public university president failed to make-good on a promise to serve adult learners.

The public has a lot more common sense than in the Ivory Tower. The public knows when it is getting good value for its tax dollars — and when it is not.

If those in public academia think they can produce better results — let them leave the chains of their taxpayer-supported employment and start their own colleges.

That would show their critics, wouldn’t it? Students fighting to sign up for their brand of quality education? Vouchers for new, start-up private colleges — what an idea!

Frank, at 9:55 am EDT on April 30, 2008

Or It Remains an Aporia

Spoken as one who teaches at a for-profit.

Walker Park Thatcher, at 11:50 am EDT on April 30, 2008

Au contraire

Au contraire, mon ami. I’ve never been of UoP.

Merely spoken as someone who sees ~200,000 UoP students — and nothing but jejune verbage from UoP’s critics.

Proof’s in the pudding.

Frank, at 4:50 pm EDT on April 30, 2008

I mean me, mon semblable,—mon frère!

That is, I myself do teach at a for-profit. I’m the one eating the pudding, both as a worker and as an observer of the narrow “education” the students receive.

Walker Park Thatcher, at 9:15 pm EDT on April 30, 2008

The pursuit — of college presidents’ salaries

For-profit? Here’s info on the salaries of college presidents —

http://www.google.com/search?q=sa...:en-US:official&client=firefox-a

IMO — looks profitable! Real profitable!

Frank, at 10:15 pm EDT on April 30, 2008

The Pursuit of Inequity & the Rhetoric of Liberty

Can you please re-post? The Title in the Subject field was inadvertently omitted and there was a type. Sorry. Thx Chithra————————————————————————-

The Pursuit of Inequity and the Rhetoric of Liberty

The U.S. dual public and private university systems must be contextualized and located within the US nation-state and its central ideological precept of market fundamentalism, which thrives on inequality and inequity.

How else can we explain the structural and systemic inequity between private university endowments and public university financing?

There’s something deeply unethical about a nation-state narrative in which Harvard’s private endowment is greater than the total operating budget to educate and provide services for 1 million children in more than 1100 schools in New York City.

We reside in a nation-state where many states and cities spend more on incarceration than on education; universities BOTH public and private are spaces that do NOT challenge in the public sphere a historically racialized inequity, most aptly described as Systemic Whiteness, within its own academic ranks and student enrollment; the practice of ‘legacy’ by the most prestigious private universities is de facto dynastic privilege.

The article sets up a safe, status-quo- preserving discourse about public university funding as being a problem of funding v. academic pursuits. I think that is a dismally distinctive ivory tower approach to a deeply structural problem that is starkly ideological and political.

Q. Why should there be a two-tier higher ed system in the first place?

Q. Why should the budget of the public higher ed system be smaller than that of the Pentagon?

The public university is uniquely a (potential) site of deliberative, contestational democracy.

Let’s ask the tough questions and help shape the answers to those very questions in the public sphere, not only in safe classrooms behind ivied walls which replicate the power structure and worldview of the predatory, expansionist, inequitable U.S. nation-state.

Dr. Chithra KarunaKaran City University of New York (CUNY)

http://www.EthicalDemocracy.blogspot.com

Chithra KarunaKaran, CUNY, at 9:20 am EDT on May 1, 2008

School vs. Factory

Well, this was timely. Here are some more thoughts this week on “The Global War on Taylorism":

http://collegiateway.org/news/2008-gwot

R.J. O’Hara, at 6:30 pm EDT on May 1, 2008

Advertisement

 Jobs Related to The Pursuit of Efficiency and the Pursuit of Folly

or search for jobs directly.

Director, Finance
University of Minnesota, Twin Cities

The University of Minnesota is a premier employer and a talent magnet attracting leading faculty and staff from around the ... see job

Staff Psychiatrist
Princeton University

Position Summary: Princeton University seeks a staff psychiatrist for a 10 month part-time (60%,) staff ... see job

Microsoft Exchange Administrator
Fashion Institute of Technology

QUALIFICATIONS Bachelors degree preferred, and 7 years equivalent experience or technical training. Experience in Windows ... see job

Senior Director, Academic Computing
University of Minnesota, Twin Cities

The University of Minnesota is a premier employer and a talent magnet attracting leading faculty and staff from around the ... see job

Faculty Assistant
Princeton University

Position Summary: The Department of Geosciences is seeking a Faculty Assistant to support the Geophysics ... see job

Communications Coordinator
University of Minnesota, Twin Cities

The University of Minnesota is a premier employer and a talent magnet attracting leading faculty and staff from around the ... see job

Director of Faculty Engagement and Program Development
Auburn University

The Office of the Vice President for University Outreach announces a search for a Director of Faculty Engagement and Program ... see job

Registered Nurse, Per Diem
Princeton University

Position Summary: Registered Nurse, Per Diem Position This is a casual hourly per diem position (September ... see job

Director of the Office of Sponsored Programs and Technology and Licensing Office
Masdar Institute of Science and Technology

The Masdar Institute of Science and Technology, dedicated to premier engineering research and the provision of a definitive, ... see job

Professor & Director
University of Minnesota, Twin Cities

The University of Minnesota is a premier employer and a talent magnet attracting leading faculty and staff from around the ... see job