News, Views and Careers for All of Higher Education
Aug. 4, 2006
“But I was not a good reader. Merely bookish, I lacked a point of view. I vacuumed books for epigrams, scraps of information, ideas, themes — anything to fill the hollow within me and make me feel educated.”
—Richard Rodriguez, Hunger of Memory
Some years ago, I was walking down a crowded hallway to class and almost stumbled over a student sitting on the floor against the wall. She sat cross-legged with a book in her lap and a yellow highlighter in her hand. On the floor next to her was a copy of the same book. It looked to me to be one of those massive science textbooks, biology maybe or chemistry. As I recovered my footing, I turned again to look down at her, and saw that she was copying the highlighted text from the book on the floor onto the pages in her lap.
For the past several years, I have been studying how first-year students at my university visualize what happens when they read. This research began with my interest in the learning relationships students develop with writing and reading in college. Initially, I studied how students’ attitudes toward writing interfered with or contributed to their chances for success in first-year composition. More recently, I’ve investigated how students depict their reading habits through drawing.
My preliminary research revealed that students who had high ACT scores in reading, who self-reported positive attitudes toward reading, and who earned high grades in their composition classes tended to represent their reading habits metaphorically. They drew pictures that symbolized their feelings or the ways reading affected them. One of these drawings (shown at right) depicts an open book with a reader poised to dive into the pages.
Students who had lower ACT scores, who reported negative attitudes, and who earned lower grades tended to represent their reading habits realistically. Common among these were self-portrait stick figures falling asleep in bed or sitting at a desk distracted by noise from another person or a television.
As I continued to examine these drawings, especially those including imaginative representations of reading, I began to investigate the various ways reading is analogized and to make a list of these metaphors.
Here is a sample of 20 from my ever-expanding collection.
In Metaphors We Live By, Lakoff and Johnson write, “Our ordinary conceptual system, in terms of which we both think and act, is fundamentally metaphorical in nature.” In addition, they argue that these metaphorically-determinate conceptual frameworks are unconsciously meta-cognitive; that is, we reason and engage automatically without understanding the powerful metaphors shaping our interactions with each other and the world around us.
Thus, metaphorical concepts also impact students’ relationships with texts. My research so far suggests that many students have not developed adequate reading habits because they bring with them incapacitating conceptions or analogies of reading. They see it as torture or a lullaby. They also assign human agency to the text. They blame it for being hard to understand, when in fact they lack the understanding to engage the text successfully.
Rather than positioning themselves to become the reader the text wants them to be — to go out and find the knowledge the text assumes the reader already owns — students lash out at the unresponsive novel, poem, play, essay, or textbook chapter. They also sometimes see reading assignments as lifeless information to be transferred from one place to another (like the student described in the anecdote above copying highlighted words from one book to another), or as Paulo Freire analogizes in Pedagogy of the Oppressed, they see knowledge as temporary commodities to be banked in their memories until withdrawn by an instructor at test time.
But these faulty conceptions of reading didn’t magically appear out of thin air. Students learned them, and many certainly learned them one way or another, implicitly or explicitly, in school. That so many of our students have come to hate reading (and writing, of course, too) is a cultural disgrace. Therefore, we need specific counter-cultural methods of instruction to adequately respond to the inappropriate metaphors of reading students bring to the classroom.
For my part, I want to discover which of my students have, knowingly or not, embraced these self-defeating notions of reading and then provide them the means to replace those conceptual roadblocks with more effective and empowering metaphors.
I also propose that professors across the curriculum actively identify and more effectively deploy metaphors of reading. In other words, rather than assume our students already know what it means to read in their disciplines, we should reflect on the kinds of reading we expect our students to practice, examine the metaphorical concepts at the heart of those reading strategies, and then present those metaphors in the classroom.
For example, what are the metaphors that might help students better visualize and practice the reading logics of comprehension, application, analysis, synthesis, and evaluation? How might these metaphors help us model more effectively for our students what it means to read in our fields? However we picture and present them, metaphors we read by should be highlighted and paraded down the crowded hallways of learning.
Want it on paper? Print this page.
Know someone who’d be interested? Forward this story.
Want to stay informed? Sign up for free daily news e-mail.
Advertisement
Dr. Musgrove once again proves himself to be an insightful observer of those who inhabit the academy. I wonder what students would say if they were given his list of sample metaphors and asked to comment on their own approach in comparison to that offered by others? Would they defend their own metaphor or perhaps adopt another? Would they come to understand the strengths and weaknesses of their own attitude toward reading? I look forward to the sequel and applaud Dr. Musgrove for his continuing efforts to provoke all of us to be more thoughtful about the fundamental tasks involved in teaching and learning.
Dick Yanikoski, at 8:55 am EDT on August 4, 2006
Thanks, Jonathan,
There more information at my research site at http://english.sxu.edu/sites/musgrove.
Laurence Musgrove, at 9:05 am EDT on August 4, 2006
Working in recent years with the least successful writers on our campus, I’ve come to understand that many a student’s garbled sentences result from not attenting to the the underlying metaphors with which we build meaning (think “underlying” and “build"). I’ll often start by pointing to a couple of places where the metaphors are aligned to what they meant to convey and then we move on to where things are not working as well. We’ll often begin a session by scanning what they’ve written for “hidden metaphors.” Many students have been able to think of this as a kind of treasure hunt and so an element of play enters into our work together. In the future, I’ll be thinking of how to bring metaphors of reading into the conversation.
Elizabeth Ciner, Associate Dean of the College at Carleton College, at 11:05 am EDT on August 4, 2006
Dick,
Thanks. The questions you offer happen to point in the same direction my current SoTL research is headed!
Laurence Musgrove, at 11:05 am EDT on August 4, 2006
I was delighted to read Dr. Musgrove’s article here and at the site he provided. I have often considered doing such a study myself, focused more on the causes for these attitudes. For a first-day ice-breaker, I have my students complete the phrases “Reading is like..., Writing is like..., and “Learning is like...” to get a handle on the overall attitude of the class. We spend time the first few weeks discussing the implications of their attitudes, including which ones of their classmates’ they would like to “try on.” Most semesters, the results of the exercise not only sadden me—so few of my current students see reading and learning as anything resembling “delightful"—but the results point to the kind of remediation with which I should begin as well. Thank you for undertaking this important work, and I hope you will share more of the pedagogical implications as you work through the data.
Jane Lasarenko, at 11:05 am EDT on August 4, 2006
It would be interesting to learn the metaphors of writing and how they might correlate with the various metaphors of reading.
Sharon, at 11:10 am EDT on August 4, 2006
“Metaphors We Read By” was instructive and apt. However, how it informs teaching is problematic.
First, are all metaphors workable in a college classroom? I have many ‘mirror’ students who won’t engage themselves in reading unless the reflection is evident.
Second, isn’t metaphor also identity? If a reading task requires a certain ‘metaphor’for effectiveness, how can we get a student to embrace another metaphor if he or she decides to identify with only one? My experience is that, in the postmodern high school classroom experience, the student becomes the metaphor rather than learning how to identify metaphor. Thus, the student’s perception of his or her talent, ability, or potential is narrowed rather than expanded. (To put it into the self-esteem context, “I take pride in being a mirror.")
Unless I am misunderstanding the concept, I see these metaphors as, certainly, descriptive of the kinds of readers we see each semester. But that only seems to boggle my mind even more as I try to address the challenge.
Jeff, Visiting Instructor of English at University of West Georgia, at 11:10 am EDT on August 4, 2006
Here is a snippet of my larger response (found here: http://www.burntoutadjunct.blogspot.com/ )
I resist the notion of presenting students with better metaphors in the hopes that by better visualization they will be able to overcome their inherent resistance to the act. This smacks of egotism and “teacherly” approaches that are insulting and not effective.
Why, you may ask? To assume that a reading/writing student must engage the text (either another’s or their own) in the same generalized manner (abstract metaphors are indicators of success, says Musgrove) does little more than say to the student: be just like me. It also degenerates into the “teacherly” activities that I deplored as a student (and don’t think work as an instructor); namely, Fill-in-the-blank-pseudo-psychiatry. • If you were a tree, what kind of tree would you be? • Your approach to reading is like…? • Learning is like…?Again, this may be good to gauge the starting point of a particular student, extrapolations to a larger pedagogical approach seems dubious at best. I am going to put serious stock into a student’s response that reading is like a sponge? Like a dancing? Like sorting? Seems like I am finding what I, as an educated instructor, want to hear. It is self-validating and complimenting.
Finally, the students will be drawing from a shared pool for their metaphors. At best, they will overlap from what the students have shared from popular culture (reading is like a 50 Cent mash-up); at worst, they will give me, the instructor, what the think I will want to hear (reading is like grafting…one idea onto another…with nice, puffy, white clouds). It is, after all, the “successful” students who scored well on the ACT that produced the satisfying (to the instructor at least) metaphors.
Piss Poor Prof, at 10:31 am EDT on August 9, 2006
In my business finance courses I use a lot of readings from the Wall Street Journal. WSJ writers like to use puns in headlines and meatphors in their columns. My problem isn’t the students’ metaphors for reading, but that they lack familiarity with metaphors of all types (mythic, biblical,business, from literature, etc.). The list we keep is of the metaphors we encounter in readings.
BizProf, at 2:05 pm EDT on August 15, 2006
I love this notion that we need to move away from our presumptions about what/how students learn in favor of actually finding out. I tell students that this kind of “active” reading is intimately linked with the writing process, since in literary studies, the text is the source of questions that lead to paper topics and theses, and of course the source of “evidence.” The better one “reads” the first time around, the better one writes (more precisely, the kind of reading we are all talking about here is already writing—drawing, highlighting, notetaking, whatever). On a less metaphoric and more mundane level, I have also started to teach students to NOT read. This means accepting the reality that on any given day or during any given week, some portion of their total assigned reading across the curriculum will, for any number of reasons, go unread (and I’m challenging myself in syllabus design to see if less can, in fact, be more pedagogically speaking). I’ve discovered that the most successful students (like the most successful professionals) learn how to prioritize their reading tasks, how to skim articles to extract the main ideas, and when to engage “close” reading. The students who struggle most have never learned these tricks—they simply start at the beginning of a stack of assigned material and stop when they run out of time. This is analogous to test-taking: some look over the test first to see what the whole thing entails, and learn to cut their losses and move on if a section isn’t going well—others just start at the beginning and stop at the buzzer. So at the level of an individual class or syllabus, I think it’s important to provide explicit instruction about how one negotiates through the set of readings due on a particular day or week: are some optional or less critical than others? And what is the relation between them (i.e. is one a “primary” text and others analyses of it)? If one has only one hour for this homework, how should one approach it? Some would say this sabotages the syllabus, but it actually comes from years of realizing that students were often not finishing the reading anyway. Since I’ve made study habits and skills a more explicit part of my teaching, the quality of student engagement with assigned materials has gone up. In short, I feel that I am teaching students how to read, and not only in the literary sense.
Karen, at 9:15 am EDT on September 1, 2006
Advertisement
or search for jobs directly.
Salem State College is an equal opportunity / affirmative action employer. Persons of color, women and persons with ... see job
DEAN School of Social/Behavioral Sciences & Multicultural Studies San Diego Mesa College Job Code: CE08-45 THE POSITION ... see job
As one of the largest proprietary post-secondary education companies in the U.S. and Canada, serving over 67,000 students at ... see job
The University of Minnesota is a premier employer and a talent magnet attracting leading faculty and staff from around the ... see job
Five College Dissertation Fellowships see job
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Assistant Director, Housing Services
Applications are now being ... see job
The University of Alberta invites nominations and applications for the position of Dean, Faculty of Pharmacy and ... see job
Information and Computer Sciences Endowed, Distinguished Faculty Positions “Bren Chairs” Position: Professors, Tenured The ... see job
Recognized as one of the nation’s “Best Value” institutions and one of the “Best in the Midwest Colleges” by the ... see job
DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES Candidate must be able to teach undergraduate and graduate courses in Business Fundamentals, ... see job
Disciplines Read Differently, too
This could be a very useful list for me, as I think more about how to teach my students more about reading. I’ve become convinced that it’s one of our most important tasks: prior, even, to the teaching of writing/communication.
Thanks.
Jonathan Dresner, at 6:30 am EDT on August 4, 2006