News, Views and Careers for All of Higher Education
July 3
Want it on paper? Print this page.
Know someone who’d be interested? Forward this story.
Want to stay informed? Sign up for free daily news e-mail.
Advertisement
The paper quoted in the story about UC Board of Regents’ meeting on SAT is a very good one.
Duncan, at 7:05 am EDT on July 4, 2008
Jack Olson: I’m a two-term AmeriCorps veteran and I can tell you that the reason the attrition rate is so high for service members is that the working and living conditions are almost inhuman and many jump at the chance when a job offer comes along.
Also, there are many versions of AmeriCorps, with NCCC being only one. Many of those other positions are dedicated to literacy (I ran tutoring programs in Washington state) and I can personally attest to their effectiveness, at least up to a point. Like any volunteer tutor in a public school, though, it is difficult to point to that individual and say “x helped 30 people learn to read...” which does nothing to diminish the necessity of these programs, though.
On another note, your post is woefully ignorant as to what constitutes community service. Apparently, urban beautification programs (which are rarely stand-alone programs) wouldn’t count. Murals — as a mundane example — provide an opportunity to educate area youth about their history and values then channel time and energy that may have gone to illegal activities into something that adds value to a community. You seem to be under the impression that the AmeriCorps members spend a year of service painting a single mural themselves, which is inaccurate; it would be area residents who actually did that part, coordinated by AmeriCorps members as one of many projects handled at one time.
And finally, AmeriCorps members are prohibited in participating in any overtly “political” activities, which would clearly include protesting anything, especially 3rd strike laws. Members aren’t even allowed to run bipartisan voting drives. So either provide some real proof and report that program (so it loses funding), or actually figure out what it is you’re talking about first.
Oh, and I guess I have one more thing. 4.7 billion dollars to beautify our urban spaces, educate our youth, care for the needy, provide preschool opportunities, build trails in our natural resource areas, establish emergency preparedness plans, train first responders, and on and on versus a trillion dollars in Iraq which has garnered us (generously) a neutral return or (realistically) a major blow to our world reputation and national security. Eliminating wasteful spending is a great rhetorical argument, but does nothing to actually establish priorities.
Get your facts straight.
joshua j. kurz, Grad Student, at 7:05 am EDT on July 4, 2008
What other public university is lucky enough to have the governor’s wife on staff there?
NC is clearly pointing the way ahead for institutional self-interest.
sk, at 11:55 am EDT on July 4, 2008
Geiser misses the fact that it was California’s decision in 1960 under Clark Kerr that lead to widespread SAT acceptance!
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/sats/where/timeline.html
jim, at 12:00 pm EDT on July 4, 2008
Kurz, you have asked me to provide good evidence that Americorps employees have lobbied and demonstrated for political causes as part of their assignments. Will you take the word of Americorps’s own Inspector General? In 1995, he discovered that an Americorps grantee, the Association of Community Organizations for Reform NOW (ACORN), had been employing Americorps volunteers to lobby for legislation, collect dues, and attend political demonstrations. In view of this, he required the ACORN Housing Corporation to return a grant of $1.1 million. Consult Citizens Against Government Waste’s website, www.cagw.org, and review their footnotes.
Politicians generally develop amnesia about their campaign platform planks once they take office, so I question whether Senator Obama, if elected President, will carry out his proposal to triple the number of Americorps participants. But, even if he did, how effective would that be if 40% of them drop out of the program before completing their terms of service? Kurz says that bad working conditions create this rate of attrition. If so, then shouldn’t a President Obama remedy those working conditions before expanding the program? Otherwide, the future Americorps program would have more dropouts than it now has participants.
Jack Olson, at 5:30 pm EDT on July 4, 2008
I simply don’t understand the benefit that we, as a society, would get by watching someone else commit suicide. I also do not understand how this cold not be “assisted suicide.” By not alerting other people to what is going on and allowing them to take their own life, can you really expect me to believe there will not be as much remorse as there would be if say, you saw someone commit murder and didn’t bother to report it?
Angela, at 8:25 pm EDT on July 4, 2008
Come on, Jack. get with it. Check your calendar. So far you’ve quoted one incident from 1994 and one from 1995. Wake up, Jack. It’s 2008 now. And soon to be 2009. Finding fault with a program for isolated incidents and quotes from well beyond ten year ago is hardly anything to indict a program. Or that this list should pay attention to.
BoB, at 9:50 am EDT on July 7, 2008
Advertisement
or search for jobs directly.
The University of Minnesota is a premier employer and a talent magnet attracting leading faculty and staff from around the ... see job
The Geosciences Department at Williams College invites applications for a tenure-track appointment beginning July 1, 2009. We ... see job
Located in Ithaca, N.Y., Cornell University is a bold, innovative, and inclusive teaching and research university of ... see job
The Citadel, The Military College of South Carolina, invites appplications for the position of Associate Athletic Director ... see job
The nation’s first university, Penn is a world-renowned leader in education, research, and innovation. Situated on a ... see job
The incumbent is responsible for providing academic advising services to students, faculty, and staff either on a one-on-one ... see job
Hillsborough Community College is a public, comprehensive multi-campus, state-supported community college located in the ... see job
Physics courses offered at HCC include: * Technical Physical Science * Fundamentals of Physics I * Fundamentals of Physics II ... see job
Bard is a highly selective co-educational liberal arts college of 1700 students, located in the Hudson Valley 90 minutes ... see job
This position has the unique opportunity to make a significant and lasting impression on the landscape of the Museum and the ... see job
Expand Americorps?
Senator Obama proposes to expand Americorps from 75,000 to 250,000 volunteers. Yet, according to libertarian author James Bovard, half of Americorps members quit before completing their term of service since President Clinton inaugurated the program. Nor is Bovard the only one who makes this criticism. The LA Times reported in 1994 that when Americorps gave the Casa Verde Builders Program $2.5 million to build energy-efficient housing in Texas, only 23 of the 64 volunteers completed their term of service. Maybe under President Obama more people will complete their term of service since he proposes to pay college students $40 an hour tax-free for their hundred hours of service. That’s a far better offer than what National Civilian Community Corps members get. They are required to serve 1,700 hours, get $13/day in living expenses and finally get a taxable $4,725 for college expenses.
But, what sort of “community service” are they likely to do? One project Americorps has assigned recruits to do has been to protest “third strike” laws for mandatory imprisonment of habitual criminals. In Indianapolis, painting a mural on the wall of a pawnshop constituted “community service.” Though President Clinton boasted that Americorps volunteers had taught millions of children to read, there is no evidence of that.
According to Citizens Against Government Waste, Americorps spends $27,000 a year per “volunteer". To triple their numbers would therefore cost $4.7 billion a year. As Senator Dirksen once remarked, “A billion here and a billion there, and pretty soon you’re talking real money.”
Jack Olson, at 2:05 pm EDT on July 3, 2008