News, Views and Careers for All of Higher Education
May 20
— Scott Jaschik and Jack Stripling
Want it on paper? Print this page.
Know someone who’d be interested? Forward this story.
Want to stay informed? Sign up for free daily news e-mail.
Advertisement
Here we have yet another uninspiring action on the part of DOEd. DeVry—a well led, well run organization—has achieved an admirably stable balance of academic and operational excellence for decades.
The Department, on the other hand, can make no claims to stability or having done much of anything admirable. Much like the FDA, DOEd can be observed most any day serving the personal aspirations of its senior bureaucrats. We would all be better off were the Department even half as effective as DeVry in achieving its organizational goals.
Watch this situation closely! When the Department fails to make an evidence-based case against DeVry, they will quietly seek a settlement payment so as not to appear what, in fact, they are.
Senior Higher Education Observer, at 2:10 pm EDT on May 20, 2008
Why is there even a rule banning incentive pay to recruiters based on enrollments? That’s what the recruiter’s paid for, isn’t it? If there’s something wrong with that (and I fail to see that there is), then the job itself should be banned.
What harm has been done to a prospective student by persuading him/her to enroll at DeVry or any other school? My alma mater regularly beseeches me to steer promising candidates their way. And why not?
DeVry invests a lot into a program aimed at delivering a reliable, consistent “product,” which of course is and should be evaluated by accreditating organizations and various government agencies. A company’s product or service should, in general, be subject to oversight and regulation to prevent fraud. But why prevent sales and/or advertising?
Rod Bell, Adjunct Professor at College of DuPage, at 3:35 pm EDT on May 20, 2008
The incentive for colleges should be to graduate individuals who could possibly passa GRE, GMAT, etc. exam or read, write, spell, and do math for some employer.
Just dragging in warm bodies with faint pulse should not be the main incentive. Retention and student success begins at first recruiter contact.
Dr. F. Gump, at 10:40 pm EDT on May 21, 2008
Advertisement
or search for jobs directly.
Empire State College’s Northeast Center/Queensbury-Glens Falls Unit seeks applications for a half-time faculty position ... see job
The Associate Director oversees a staff of full time buyers and student aides. Responsibilities include a full range of ... see job
This posting is on ongoing pool. When an opening arises in the math department, coordinators will access applicants in this ... see job
Live and Work in the “New Downtown Los Angeles", the hottest “In” area in the city! We are the Colburn School Conservatory. ... see job
Campus:
Job Summary:
Work Schedule: ... see job
In the historic, coastal city of Charleston, the Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC) offers a wide range of ... see job
The University of Minnesota is a premier employer and a talent magnet attracting leading faculty and staff from around the ... see job
Join the Pack! A community with nearly 8,000 faculty and staff, and 30,000 students. NC State is one of the largest employers ... see job
The University of Minnesota is a premier employer and a talent magnet attracting leading faculty and staff from around the ... see job
Saint Louis University is a Jesuit Catholic University. Through teaching, research, health care and community service, Saint ... see job
Yes, but not the top 50 college towns
It is worth noting that the ARCHE study was limited to the 50 largest metro areas, which means that some cities (e.g., Birmingham, Lincoln, etc.) are omitted even though their total student enrollment and degrees granted are greater than some of those in these rankings. In other words, a list of the top 50 college towns would look quite different — and would be equally interesting.
Dr. J, at 10:05 am EDT on May 20, 2008