News, Views and Careers for All of Higher Education
Oct. 19, 2007
College leaders and Education Department officials have spent much of the last two years talking past each other on the subject of measuring student learning. Critics have accused the federal government of pushing an overly simplistic, inflexible approach that emphasizes at all costs the ability to compare one college’s performance. Education Department officials have increasingly insisted that they are not pushing a one-size-fits-all model, but they have also regularly said that they believe too few institutions are aggressively pursuing their desired agenda.
Recent weeks have brought some signs that cooperation may be replacing conflict. Last month, the Education Department awarded a $2.4 million grant to three higher education associations to assess existing, and develop new, tests and other tools to measure student outcomes on a wide range of skills. And today, Under Secretary Sara Martinez Tucker, as part of a national tour on college issues, will watch as faculty members and students at Miami Dade College sign a “covenant” in which they pledge to embrace the two-year institution’s new “learning outcomes” initiative.
It would be easy to dismiss the Miami Dade event as a public relations gimmick, but several aspects of it are noteworthy. It underscores the fact that as a lot of college officials have been saying all along, many institutions have been wrestling for years with finding thoughtful, creative ways to gauge the success of their own students. It shows that faculty members — who played a central role in developing some of the home-grown tests and tools that Miami Dade is using — are willing to engage in the hard work of holding themselves accountable. And it suggests, too, that Education Department officials are indeed primarily interested, as they have repeatedly avowed, in seeing colleges embrace the accountability movement, even if they don’t use methods that are as transparent and as readily comparable as the agency’s leaders might hope.
“You’ve heard [Education Secretary Margaret Spellings] say that we don’t want to do it to anybody,” Tucker said by telephone from Miami Thursday. “We want to encourage them to show leadership and do this. Am I endorsing [Miami Dade’s] approach? No. What I’m here to do is say i applaud that you’re getting the ball rolling.”
Miami Dade, which with 160,000 students (half of whom attend for credit) is among the nation’s largest institutions, has spent two years producing a system for showing whether its students are ending their time at the college (in the classroom and outside it) not only with knowledge in their chosen fields but with a grounding in the sort of general education skills that employers want and citizens need. (Some of the work was conducted in conjunction with the Association of American Colleges and Universities’ Liberal Education and America’s Promise program.) Through a process that involved professors, staff members, administrators, employers and alumni, the college developed a list of 10 desired “learning outcomes” for students. It wanted all of them to be able to:
Once college officials agreed on the outcomes, the next task was finding ways to measure how students fare. Miami Dade found some ready-made tools that suited its purposes, like the Community College Survey of Student Engagement and an existing information literacy test. But given that the outcomes they were seeking to instill were specific to Miami Dade, the institution’s officials found that they needed home-grown ways to measure them, too.
“We don’t think there’s any test in the world that would be as specific as what we’re trying to measure,” said Norma Martin Goonen, provost for academic and student affairs at Miami Dade. “We trust that our faculty is in the best position to say, ‘These are the things [we want to measure] and these are the ways to measure them.’ “
All told, Miami Dade’s system for measuring learning outcomes includes a half-dozen different tools. As is the case at many institutions, Miami Dade professors (often in consultation with their academic departments) will “embed” discipline-specific learning goals for students in each course. Certain majors will use student electronic portfolios to show student progress. The college will also use data from the survey it gives to all graduating students each year to round out the picture.
The newest and most central tool in Miami Dade’s array of measures is a set of faculty-developed and faculty-graded “authentic assessment” tasks (typically defined as problems or essay prompts that reflect real-life situations) that are designed to gauge students’ skills in writing, critical thinking, and problem solving, among other capabilities. Miami Dade gave the tests to a random and representative 18 percent sample of graduating students last year, by having professors use class periods to administer them, a tactic it found effective. “We thought about throwing a pizza party as an enticement,” said Goonen, but administrators ultimately decided to mandate the test for a certain group of students rather than seeking volunteers.
Miami Dade officials plan to compare students’ results on the assessments from year to year, and because the college is in the process of “mapping” where in the curriculum and in outside activities students are supposed to have picked up the various skills, “if we find that students didn’t do well in a particular outcome, we can look back at the curriculum and co-curricular activities and diagnose where the curriculum needs to be strengthened or reinforced,” said Goonen.
Goonen said she recognized that using more standardized measures would put Miami Dade’s approach to assessment more in line with the Education Department’s push for comparability, a cause championed by the Secretary of Education’s Commission on the Future of Higher Education. (The college also plans to use its results primarily to guide its own internal work, rather than make them public, as the Spellings Commission has urged.)
But “we don’t think any standardized test that exists now will approximate what we’re trying to measure, and it certainly won’t be developed by our faculty, which we think is key,” she said. “It’s important to them and to us that they came up with the assessment of these, and that they’re responsible for carrying them out. That’s really where it’s at.”
Tucker reiterated that department officials are not counting on having colleges all use the same measures. “When we said comparability, it’s not that every campus has to use the same technique,” she said. “It’s that consumers should be able to compare what colleges do, and they should report things in ways that students can understand. It’s going to take time [for colleges to figure out] which are right ones, and in the meantime the key is that [colleges] use measures that give them the information both to improve their offerings to students and to provide something meaningful for the American public.”
She added: “That’s what Miami Dade is doing, and I applaud them.”
Want it on paper? Print this page.
Know someone who’d be interested? Forward this story.
Want to stay informed? Sign up for free daily news e-mail.
Advertisement
And Sara Martinez Tucker applauded saying that it came up at precisely the time that the Commission suggested it should to be held accountable.
It’s preposterous to suggest that higher ed hasn’t been engaged in a lengthy conversation about accountability, for her and others to take credit is just bizarre.
skeptic, at 8:35 am EDT on October 19, 2007
I agree with others. I fail to see how this is ‘news’. Institutions have been doing this for years. I think the real story in this is, “Miami Dade finally addresses assessment on their campus.”
Jim, at 9:15 am EDT on October 19, 2007
No, this type of assessment is not new. I didn’t see Miami-Dade’s plan for interpreting their assessment findings to the public, either. But congratulations to them for enlightening Ms. Tucker and others from the Spellings group. We should all benefit from that.
I hope that they will learn that any institution in the southeast, under SACS, that doesn’t have an assessment plan, results, and use of results will be subject to recommendations. I hope that they will also learn to recognize leaders in the assessment movement nationwide which we in the community have known of for almost 20 years. Miami-Dade will probably take its place among that number.
Grocheio, Asst VP Planning and Institutional Effectiveness at Shorter College, at 9:15 am EDT on October 19, 2007
It is important to remember that Miami-Dade is primarily a junior or community college whose students mainly transfer to FIU.
MDC is very unique in both its size and minority populations.
In the interest of greater accountability, it would be a step in the right direction to release state licensure rates, which Florida’s community colleges, as well as hybrid programs that now sprouting up, do not do.
However, according to SACS membership list, there are only six accredited campuses, not the eight campuses listed by MDC. This discrepancy is difficult to understand, since MDC was just reaffirmed in 2005.
http://www.sacscoc.org/pdf/weblist092606.pdf
Glen S. McGhee, Dir., at Florida Higher Education Accountability Project, at 10:20 am EDT on October 19, 2007
I think the Department of Education should get out of Washington more often. Schoolcraft College in MI started these goals eight years ago.
Louis A Reibling Ph.D, Retired administrator at Schoolcraft, at 10:20 am EDT on October 19, 2007
Many campuses are already defining goals, mapping the curriculum and co-curriculum so that the goals are intentionally addressed, and assessing student achievement over time.
Miami-Dade, which has been a leader in AAC&U’s LEAP initiative (and whose president is a member of AAC&U’s board of directors), has done us all a huge service in taking the next step—to make their important campus efforts visible to the public. Those of us in education and the media should follow their example to spread the message about the importance of liberal education outcomes wherever we can.
Carol Schneider, President at AAC&U, at 11:10 am EDT on October 19, 2007
There is nothing wrong with MDCC focusing on the assessment of their students. What is surprising is that Spellings is so naive that she and her cohorts have so little understanding of what happens on campuses across the country. Note to Ms. Spellings: Most of us who teach or have taught really wanted out students to learn “something.” It is simply that the “something” we wanted them to learn may not be what YOU believe ought to be learned. Yours (and I am sure much of your conservative colleagues’) efforts to compare the students at MDCC with those of, say, CCNY is unrealistic at best, and just plain stupid at worst. Although I have very limited personal knowledge, I would bet a small fortune that faculty at every institution (although the University of Phoenix might be an exception)struggle with what are the appropriate outcomes from their schools. What contstitutes technological literarcy, quantative literarcy, language proficincy, etc.? We can probably agree on the general categories, but when we get down to specifics, the devil is always in the details. But this is not just a higher ed problem. The strong conservative movement seems to have cast is pall over most of education.
In the mid-80’s I served on a committee that set out to make assessment instruments that supposedly measured common elements that kids should learn in school. Supposedly these were to be useful to schools in assessing how well their students are doing in areas they believed were important to their students. For example, suppose a school wished to minimize their efforts on a topic like adding fractions because technology is changing the importance of learning this. (When was the last time any of you added 5/7 + 11/13?) But other schools thought this was a useful skill which trained the kids in following a disciplined procedure. So there would be questions related to adding fractions on the test. So, if the first school didn’t do well, who cares. They didn’t see it as important anyway. However, I was the naive one. Once it appears on the standardized test it becomes important for ALL kids to learn this stuff, even if the teachers, administrators, school boards and community don’t feel that way. This is the problem with trying to set up so called standards across wide regions, whether it is a state, a nation or even international goals.
So, getting back to the work at MDCC, I find it commendable. However, what scares me is that someone in DC may soon require all schools to do likewise, then create a giant master plan applied to all.
Fred Flener, Retired, at 12:40 pm EDT on October 19, 2007
The porgram is at Dade is not new. Our college has measured similiar general education outcomes for 4 years qualitatively and 10 year quantitatively (cognitively). Compliments to Dade for getting national recognition. Is the Department of Education out of touch with ground level action in the area of measuring student learning outcomes or are our accrediting associations and we as individual institutions not doing a good job of communicating with the Department of Education?
Glen Snider, Co-ordinator of Institutional Research at Eastern Arizona College, at 1:05 pm EDT on October 19, 2007
To me, I think this is a bad example.
I do this kind of calculation all the time as a scientist. I can’t believe there are schools that feel this is not a needed skill. But this explains why some of the people I know can’t even check their kids’ homework.
The point is not that if you can remember how to do it, but to understand it why it have to be done that way and this is what calculator will not help you.
How you test it is another story.
Duncan, at 2:50 pm EDT on October 19, 2007
Fred Flener suggests that this is a ‘conservative’ movement, but to politely correct him it should be duly noted that many conservatives in Congress oppose the direction of the Commission and Secretary Spellings and her staff.
Sen. Lamar Alexander from Tennessee, a self-described conservative republican, has been the strongest advocate of higher education and raised the alarm bells very early at the direction that Spellings and her Commission want to take higher education.
Most House and Senate Republicans, as well as most Democrats in both chambers, are united in opposition to the federalization of higher education. On this issue, Spellings stands largely alone, isolated from conservatives, liberals, and moderates.
skeptic, at 5:15 pm EDT on October 19, 2007
Advertisement
or search for jobs directly.
Alliant International University is looking for an Assoc. Provost for Pedagogy/Quality Assurance who will develop & maintain ... see job
DeVry Inc. (NYSE: DV) is the parent organization of DeVry University, Advanced Academics, Ross University, Chamberlain ... see job
Job Description: This faculty member teaches College Preparatory Writing courses. Duties & Responsibilities: Teaches lecture ... see job
Northeastern University, founded in 1898 and located in Boston, is a private research university that is a leader in ... see job
COORDINATOR OF ACADEMIC ASSESSMENT POSITION ANNOUNCEMENT Butler County Community College is currently accepting applications ... see job
“Defined by a prestigious faculty, red-brick architecture and expansive lawns, the century-old school is often referred to as ... see job
As one of the largest degree-granting higher education systems in North America, DeVry University provides high-quality, ... see job
Stony Brook University ranks in the top 2 percent of all universities in the world. The London Times Higher Education ... see job
Job Description: This faculty member teaches Speech courses including Fundamentals of Communication, Public Speaking, and ... see job
The Dean is responsible for the coordination of the overall instructional program and serves as a primary resource for ... see job
Is this new?
Am I missing something? Is this something new? I thought schools all over the country were doing precisely this. We certainly are, and I don’t consider us to be anywhere near the forefront of the “assessment movement.”
assesssment director, at 7:50 am EDT on October 19, 2007