Advertisement

Advertisement

News, Views and Careers for All of Higher Education

Teaching Success

Study skills courses at community colleges really do help students succeed, at least in Florida, a study of the state’s 28 community colleges finds.

Sixty percent of students who enrolled in for-credit “success courses,” classes that teach students skills for note-taking, test-taking and time management, had “academic success” during the study’s five years, while just 40 percent of students who did not take success classes had the same success and had earned a degree or certificate, transferred to a state university or continued enrollment in a community college.

In a field where student retention is a major concern, the results of the study, “Do Student Success Courses Actually Help Community College Students Succeed?” are significant, illustrating that success courses really are effective in helping students succeed.

Students who enrolled in success courses – even if they did not complete them – were eight percent more likely to earn a degree or certificate within five years than students who did not take a success course. They were also eight percent more likely to still be enrolled in community college five years later. The same data was used for a 2006 Florida Department of Education study that looked only at students who completed success courses.

Released today by the Community College Research Center (CCRC) at Teachers College, Columbia University, the study tracked 37,000 students who first entered a Florida community college in the fall of 1999 over the course of 17 terms (five years and eight months).

Thirty-six percent of students enrolled in a state-regulated “student life skills” course. At some colleges, the classes are mandatory while at others they are electives. Twenty-eight percent of the students studied took both a success course and at least one remedial credit.

Controlling for gender, race, English proficiency, test scores and several other student characteristics, success course enrollment is associated with a “probability of success” nine percent greater than for students who did not take the classes.

Davis Jenkins, a senior research associate at CCRC and one of the study’s three authors, said it was “surprising that one course across the system could have such a dramatic effect on what happened to a student.”

Though results did vary from college to college, Jenkins said that Florida’s “structured system” for success classes meant that results were generally similar between the campuses. Even in states with less centralized success programs, Jenkins said he “suspect[s] we would find this effect,” with students who took success classes more likely to obtain credentials, stay enrolled at the college or transfer to a four-year college.

The study was sponsored by the Lumina Foundation’s Achieving the Dream initiative, which aims to help community college students succeed by analyzing data on student achievement. Several Florida community colleges are participating in the project.

Dominique Timmons, a 19-year-old student at Hillsborough Community College in Tampa, said that without the success course she took there, she “definitely would not be doing as well.” The class, she said, “taught me things I didn’t know about” like that she should sit toward the front of a classroom to learn more. Without the time management skills she learned in the class, “I’d be running around not knowing what to do.”

Timmons wants to be a chef and will transfer to Johnson and Wales University’s Miami campus in March 2008. “I know I can take my skills there,” she said. “I can take my skills with me and they’ll help me do well.”

Ted Wright, special assistant to the president for strategic initiatives at Broward Community College in Fort Lauderdale, said that his college has used success courses “to treat the heart attack and keep the patient alive for the first day” rather than planning for long-term success because the classes are required of students who need “significant” remediation.

“So many of these students are leaving after one semester or not even completing one semester,” he said. “We’re just trying to keep them here a little bit longer … to help them through the first and second semesters and outside the classroom before looking longer term.”

The instructors of Broward’s success courses also serve as their students’ “success coaches,” providing additional support and counseling for students during their first semester.

Tallahassee Community College requires success courses of students who place into two or more remedial classes but allows all students, whether in their first semester at the school or their last, to take a success class as an elective. Sheri Rowland, the acting director of Tallahassee’s Student Success Center, said that statistics collected since the fall of 2003 show that first-time college students who take the college’s success class have higher GPAs and fewer withdrawals than those who don’t.

The college will offer 63 sections of 28 to 30 students in the fall semester, Patrick McDermott, a success course instructor, said.

Jenkins, one of the study’s authors, cautioned that though the success course is “not a silver bullet, it certainly does have a substantial effect.”

Jennifer Epstein

Got something to say?


Want it on paper? Print this page.
Know someone who’d be interested? Forward this story.
Want to stay informed? Sign up for free daily news e-mail.

Advertisement

Comments

Or perhaps what they really need is a good reality check: that entrepreneurship is a viable avenue for success in the real world, that grades and schoolwork is oftimes irrelevant to entrepreneurship... and that there’s a life beyond corporate employment.

I know that’s what I’ll tell my kids.

Go Kiyosaki!

Mind Power, Dr at Ateneo de Manila, at 5:55 am EDT on August 1, 2007

Self-selection bias?

Maybe those who had the initiative to take the course succeeded because of this initiative, regardless of what was taught in the course.

The fact that even those who dropped out of the course did well is telling.

Joe, at 6:55 am EDT on June 18, 2007

I would like to find the original study—clicked on the site but ?? could not find it. Can anyone help? I know my students don’t know how to study for one kind of test vs. another, etc. and would like to know about the training approaches used at those colleges.

acjunct, at 7:20 am EDT on June 18, 2007

Random assignment?

I had the same reaction as Joe: were people randomly assigned to the courses or are we simply seeing a self-selection bias? If it’s the latter then that’s not telling us much about such courses’ utility.

The fact that people who dropped out from this training also did better suggests that they may have found the courses less useful given their already existing skills for studying.

EH, at 7:25 am EDT on June 18, 2007

Perhaps the real numbers lie it the confidence to complete this task students feel. This perhaps will enable them to continue to completion. Perhaps the class offers more than was measured, self esteem, reinforcement of known information, the university is working WITH me.... All of this together can make a person feel differently about education. There is no measure for the one’s that could not afford to continue and where they would fit into this statistic!

obiwaun, at 7:55 am EDT on June 18, 2007

As stated, some students are mandated to these classes- some are required. As someone very involved in this area, it does make a difference. There are many other things taught besides time management. Generally students are given assessments to find their weaknesses so they know where to concentrate their corrective efforts, and are taught general skills like time management, note taking, test-taking, instructor expectations, etc. Those who teach these courses have many stories of changing students lives. I have plenty. I am so lucky to be able to teach these courses. “acjunct” we are happy to share info on test taking skills, just email me: psfcontact@sbcglobal.net. Always glad to help if we can.

anothervoice, at 8:45 am EDT on June 18, 2007

RE: Self-selection bias?

This article does not probe causality, as it clearly stated there. However, these courses target remedial students (required or encouraged courses), and therefore, one would expect a negative bias because (in theory) these students are less likely to “succeed” than non-remedial students. So the “self-selection” bias argument is limited here. Positive results are encouraging but require further investigation using quasi- and experimental methods.

Juanca, at 9:30 am EDT on June 18, 2007

Let’s Start Success Classes Earlier

It’s great to read about the positive results from the success classes. Whatever it takes to get more students to graduate is a move in the right direction. What about having these type of classes in high school and possibly earlier in school? When taking review classes for professional exams, like the CPA exam, there are a variety of strategies discussed that can be used earlier in school. Should one have to wait until they are at the height of their education to be able to learn some fundamental strategies they could have used years earlier?

Michael Lopata, The Education Path, at 10:05 am EDT on June 18, 2007

Sunset vs Sunrise

I agree with all the questions about the data and it’s validity given the national problem and the many “pilot/model (FYE) programs” in higher ed. It is VERY interesting how this was assessed given that fidelity was not high but seemingly had no/limited effect on outcomes. Additionally, it was not made clear whether other institutional assistance programs aided the students throughout the study (17semesters) allowing him/her to engage a more rich environment often not captured during evaluation of programs.

As one who does program review most deans/directors and coordinators are primarily concerned with JUSTIFYING their own program so looking to see what other resources may have aided the student is not “natural” in this regard. These reviews often are “look what my students do” so if I had more resources I could offer a more robust program or (as often the case) sustain/preserve the current offering.

Is it that the students gained more because someone “cared” as I am beginning to see. I have witnessed (3years RA/3years drug prevention/2years IR) an overwhelmingly number of students have the tools and desire but the perception that nobody cares if I make it or society doesn’t care is simply HUGH for them. Contrary to popular believe students want structure and rigor as they continue to measure their chance of becoming Paris Hilton, 50 Cent, Terrell Owens, against becoming Ken Chenault, Barak Obama, or David Lettermen.

Did the study consider pedagogy and the fact that higher ed is “just” admitting/realizing that most students with input deficiencies often have similar outcomes across the races when comparing apples to apples.

It seems that legacy instruments/implementation of assessment based on all the “ism” (class, sex, etc.) are under review.

Walker, Analyst, at 12:45 pm EDT on June 18, 2007

Random assignment and cause finding

I am constantly amazed and bemused by the ways that experimentalists fail to grasp the implications of their favored methods. So often commentators like Joe, EH and Juanca seem to assume that experimental methods are simple “cause finders”, something akin to those metal detectors you see people waving over the sand at the beach. They seem to think that if you just wave an experimental design over a phenomena out will pop “cause”. The fact is you actually need a theory, and your methods, not to mention methodology, has to account for that theory in a logical way. Random assignment in the way suggested above is discussed atheoretically. And, in fact, would vitiate not clarify the findings reported.

Random assignment that doesn’t account for the reasons why students take a course changes the features of the class (the community of people) and alters a key factor in any credible theory (save behaviorism) of learning; that is, “motivation”, and thus the “treatment” or course being “tested”. Such a design MAY tell us something important about the course (the curriculum and how it was taught in a particular instance), but not much about the class (the curriculum, instruction and how students with different motivations interact with that curriculum and instruction) since the design systematically ignores this factor. A reasonable theory, or more precisely, hypothesis, would be that the curriculum, instruction and classroom community (including the fact that motivated students are enrolled) in interaction lead to the positive results found. Presumably, an informed educator would teach groups of students differently depending upon their reasons for being in the course, since we have good evidence that the reasons why students take a course is a vital factor in learning and achievement. So, eliminating that as a factor would bring into question the validity of the findings if random assignment like that proposed above were used in the design. This is a case of the tail of the method wagging the dog of the theory. Instead of giving simplistic exhortations to use random assignment, why don’t you explain how experimental methods could be used to say something about causality in the authentic, complex contexts in which these educators are actually working?

Such limitations about random assignment in this case should be obvious to anyone knowledgeable about learning and who adopts as critical an eye toward their OWN preferred methodology as to that of others’ designs and methods. Our first obligation as empirical inquirers is to know the limitations of our OWN methodologies so that we do not indiscriminantly and ignorantly apply them.

DJV, at 2:50 pm EDT on June 18, 2007

Read the paper!

Just click through to the main site and select the article. The link you need is http://ccrc.tc.columbia.edu/Publication.asp?UID=531and then download the PDF. The link to a pdf of the full Florida study is cited (but not hot-linked) in the paper. It answers the questions asked in the discussion here. (Yes, students who do not need remedial courses show larger improvement, but the change is significant for all groups.)

Many of the schools involved in the study require a “success” class for students who place into developmental courses, but that may not have been the case over the entire period covered by the study. Our college began requiring, rather than just recommending, the course as its results became clear from internal studies.

For those not aware of what “developmental course” means, the content reaches as low as fractions (5th grade math?) with a peak around reading and math at the 8th or 9th grade level (basic algebra).

Trust me, these kids need help with managing their time, their money, taking notes, even with going to class the next day. In my opinion, the biggest challenge they face is simply comprehending that they were lied to in high school about what level math or english they were passing and how much of it they were learning, not to mention whether passing the HS grad exam a year or three ago means they are ready for college algebra or english.

CCPhysicist, at 2:55 pm EDT on June 18, 2007

Advertisement

 Jobs Related to Teaching Success

or search for jobs directly.

UHP Student Outreach Coordinator
University of Minnesota, Twin Cities

The University of Minnesota is a premier employer and a talent magnet attracting leading faculty and staff from around the ... see job

Associate Dean for Planning
University of Minnesota, Twin Cities

The University of Minnesota is a premier employer and a talent magnet attracting leading faculty and staff from around the ... see job

Simulation Center Director, School of Medicine- Bahamas
Ross University

Ross University School of Medicine Bahamas campus, located on the beautiful island of Grand Bahama, invites applications for ... see job

E-Learning Platform Administrative Analyst
DeVry Inc.

DeVry Inc. (NYSE: DV) is the parent organization of DeVry University, Advanced Academics, Ross University, Chamberlain ... see job

Faculty, College Preparatory Writing — 202201
Miami Dade College

Job Description: This faculty member teaches College Preparatory Writing courses. Duties & Responsibilities: Teaches lecture ... see job

Special Assistant to the Vice President for Academic Affairs
Fashion Institute of Technology

REQUIRED QUALIFICATIONS Bachelor Degree required. Master’s degree preferred, ideally in higher education administration. At ... see job

Systemwide Director of Training
Alliant International University

Alliant International University is looking for an Assoc. Provost for Pedagogy/Quality Assurance who will develop & maintain ... see job

Director, Program & Student Services (111937)
Northeastern University

Northeastern University, founded in 1898 and located in Boston, is a private research university that is a leader in ... see job

Database Coordinator / Exempt Professional
University of Colorado at Denver and Health Sciences Center-Downtown Denver

Posting Description: The University of Colorado Denver seeks a Database Coordinator to work in the Pediatric ... see job

Computer Assisted Language Learning (CALL) Coordinator
Pratt Institute

Position Summary: With minimum supervision and wide latitude for independent judgment provide academic management for the ... see job