News, Views and Careers for All of Higher Education
June 1, 2007
Slowly, bit by bit, Andrew M. Cuomo is turning himself into the nation’s student loan czar.
Cuomo put the issues of perceived and real conflicts of interest between lenders and college officials on the national map in a big way this winter with a series of revelations and allegations about questionable arrangements and practices, and he cemented his role as the industry’s watchdog with a steady stream of settlement agreements between the New York attorney general’s office and lenders, colleges and universities.
With his latest such agreements, reached Thursday with the National Association of Student Financial Aid Administrators and with Columbia University, Cuomo has assured himself (or at least his office) a significant role in oversight of the student loan industry potentially well after he has left his current job.
In both instances, the attorney general’s office secured commitments from Columbia and NASFAA, respectively, that Cuomo or his representatives would monitor their student loan and other practices for at least five years. In the case of the university, Columbia agreed to report annually to the attorney general for five years on its “all policies and procedures relating to student lending” and “any conflicts or violations of the Code of Conduct” that the university agreed to adopt. In the sweeping agreement signed by the financial aid administrators’ group, it agreed to have representatives from Cuomo’s office at its annual meetings and “any other NASFAA meetings the office wishes to attend.”
That arrangement will begin this year, quite likely with a visit from Cuomo himself, to whom NASFAA has issued an invitation to speak.
Like many aspects of the inquiry that Cuomo (along with his Congressional collaborators, Sen. Edward M. Kennedy (D-Mass.) and Rep. George Miller (D-Calif.)) has inspired, Thursday’s developments show how quickly the ground shifts in the student loan space, and how Cuomo is pretty much always on top when it does.
Just weeks ago, when Cuomo began releasing findings and accusations of wrongdoing by financial aid officers, often in strongly worded language, NASFAA’s president, Dallas Martin, fought back. In a March 19 letter, he accused Cuomo of doing financial aid officers a “great disservice” and having “dishonored their good names” with broad-based accusations of illicit behavior. Some financial aid administrators, privately and on e-mail listservs, cheered Martin for standing up for them.
But as the weeks wore on and the revelations uncovered by Cuomo and others grew more serious — and as NASFAA’s own practices of heavy bank sponsorship of its conferences themselves came under scrutiny — NAFSAA officials began changing their tune. Martin and other NASFAA leaders began more openly acknowledging that Cuomo was raising good points, and in late April, the group said it would consider adopting new guidelines for the behavior of its members and for its own relationships with student loan providers.
Cuomo’s office, though, kept the pressure on. Two weeks ago, the attorney general’s deputy counselor and special assistant, Benjamin M. Lawsky, wrote Martin to say that he believed the code of conduct the organization was developing was inadequate. “The code you have proposed is inadequate in that it does no more than recite vague, lofty goals of generalized ethical behavior,” the New York attorney general wrote. “The train has left the station. NASFAA must get on board now or be left behind. Either way, we believe the law and the marketplace will soon impose the appropriate restrictions that your organization has, thus far, been unwilling to accept.”
In the last week and a half, officials and lawyers from NASFAA and from Cuomo’s office have been engaged in intense deliberations over a revision of the code and of NASFAA’s policies governing its own relationships with sponsors and vendors. And Thursday, at a news conference in New York, Cuomo and Martin stood side by side announcing their agreement, saying that they were now on the same page. After being “initially opposed to Cuomo’s code,” the attorney general’s office said in a news release, “NASFAA is now committing itself to a new set of practices aimed at deterring corruption in the student loan industry.”
“Hyper competition for preferred lender status led lenders – and some school financial aid officers — into ever lower ethical and moral depths,” said Cuomo. “But today shows that this industry is no longer engaged in a race to the bottom. By adopting the code, agreeing to end bad practices, and beginning to operate in the best interest of students, these institutions have begun a race to the top. Lenders and schools now realize that to compete, they must do business cleaner and better than others in the industry.”
Under the multipronged agreement reached by NASFAA and Cuomo, the financial aid administrators’ group agreed to conform its own refurbished code of conduct for its members in campus financial aid offices largely to the one that Cuomo’s office has been promulgating, which will mean that Cuomo’s principles will, in one fell swoop, reach the vast majority of financial aid offices in the country. Under the group’s code of conduct, which its board adopted this month, financial aid administrators would:
In addition, NASFAA agreed to radically alter its own practices regarding exhibitors and sponsorships at its conferences, which result in hundreds of thousands of dollars in revenue for the association each year. (As similar practices do for other higher education groups, particularly those, like for presidents, business officers and technology administrators, whose members have their fingers on purse strings.)
Under the latter agreement, NASFAA said it would bar all social activities sponsored by lenders or other exhibitors; prohibit prize drawings and limit the value of giveaways by lenders or other exhibitors to $10; eliminate named sponsorship of conference events and tiered recognition and pricing of sponsorships, and end (at least temporarily) a lender-financed scholarship program that has given away in the neighborhood of $200,000 at recent annual meetings.
In an interview after Thursday’s news conference with Cuomo, NASFAA’s Martin said the changes in the association’s conference policies would have “some financial impact on us” (the association has offered to return all payments to 2007 conference sponsors who wanted the money back, and has refunded at least $120,000, Martin said.) But despite that short term pain, he said, “in the long term, it’s the correct thing to do.”
He said he did not believe that NASFAA’s own practices had been corrupt, since “we’re not the ones who have been sponsoring the parties or doing the wining and dining,” which has occurred during financial aid officers’ “private time” at NASFAA meetings. But he acknowledged that the association had provided the venue at which that wining and dining took place, and that “we’re going to say now that we’re going to extend our venue, and this just isn’t going to happen in our venue.”
Martin said that NASFAA did not control the decisions of the regional and state groups of financial aid officers that, like the national association, bankroll their annual meetings largely with support from student loan companies and other vendors. (The practices of those groups have come in for news media scrutiny, too.) But he said he was confident that “they will fall in line pretty quickly.... I’d like to think they’ll say, ‘NASFAA has given us a new business plan, and this is a model we should adopt, too.’ I can’t control them, but I really believe almost everybody’s going to insist on doing this, too.”
The NASFAA chief said he welcomed the provision of the agreement under which the association would invite Cuomo or another representative of the attorney general’s office to attend its meetings for five years, “to ensure compliance with these policies and procedures.” Although some financial aid officers described the plan as excessively intrusive, Martin said he did not “see that as an intrusion at all.... If we’re not behaving correctly, I expect somebody to call us on it.” He added: “If he wants to do it for the next 10, we don’t care. We’re glad to have him.”
Mark Kantrowitz, publisher of FinAid, said the agreement between NASFAA and Cuomo would allow “the national conference to focus on its core mission of professional development and student aid policy advocacy, without distraction.” In the recent past, he added, “there’s been an environment that blurred ethical boundaries. The agreements set clear standards as to what is and is not acceptable behavior.... The agreements also distance the lenders (and other exhibitors) a bit from the conference attendees. This will increase objectivity, transparency and accountability. When the dust settles, I think this will ultimately be healthy for the profession and the industry and beneficial for students.
Columbia’s Settlement
The university’s agreement with Cuomo was designed to resolve the attorney general’s findings that David Charlow, who resigned last month as its executive director of financial aid, had owned stock in Student Loan Xpress, a loan provider that appeared on the university’s list of preferred lenders, to which it referred prospective student borrowers. (In a related development, the University of Southern California announced Thursday that its financial aid director, Catherine C. Thomas, would retire as of today, becoming the fourth campus aid official to lose his or her job because of the student loan inquiry. Thomas, like Charlow, owned stock in Student Loan Xpress.)
Columbia denied having violated any law, and said in a statement Thursday that “it is important to note that Columbia University never had the revenue sharing relationships with lenders prohibited by the Code or the subject of the Attorney General’s settlements with other schools. We regret that a long-time, well-regarded employee failed to uphold the trust that had been placed in him by the University and did not conform to standards that are commonplace in universities and business.”
Under its agreement with Cuomo, the university said it too would adopt the Cuomo code of conduct, that it would pay $1.125 million into the national fund that Cuomo has established to educate potential borrowers about their student loan options. ("Columbia is not paying a fine or making any restitution as part of the settlement,” the university insisted in its news release.)
Columbia officials also said they would institute changes — some of which had been in the works before Cuomo began his inquiry — that would centralize the financial aid operations of its three undergraduate colleges, apply its conflict of interest policies more clearly to a broader range of campus officials, and require that all preferred lender lists be approved by committees of at least three people and approved by a senior administrator from outside the financial aid office.
In addition, the university agreed that it would make annual reports to Cuomo’s office for the next five years, a provision upon which the attorney general’s office insisted.
Want it on paper? Print this page.
Know someone who’d be interested? Forward this story.
Want to stay informed? Sign up for free daily news e-mail.
Advertisement
Here’s a crazy idea: Why not take the “fine” paid by the institutions and use it to pay down the students’ debts? And then, why not implement some jail time for the offenders?
Linda, Cuomo, at 9:05 am EDT on June 1, 2007
I think it’s time for the commmunity to stop pointing fingers at others about what they have and have not done in response to this issue, and look in the mirror.
Do you know what your institution’s gift rules are?
Have you personally accepted a gift of more than $5.00 in value from any vendor — not just related to student loans, but software companies, book vendors, etc?
Have you personally told these vendors, “No, I’m sorry I cannot accept your gift."?
Have you personally told your state, regional and national organizations that you are not comfortable with them accepting donations/sponsorships from outside groups?
If you can answer yes to those questions then thank you for your ethics and for working to make others aware of improper activities.
If you can not answer yes to those questions then I suggest you reflect on why.
We are responsible for our personal actions.
Dallas Martin is not responsible for what our institutions allow us to do, or what we personally chose to do. He has for the past 30 years championed what it best for students in the areas of access, choice and funding. He has worked within the guidelines that the Congress and the Department have provided. He has brought to the attention of both entities questionable activities of lenders and schools. Yet he is the one caught in the spotlight — a spotlight that should be shared by a number of folks out there.
Last, answer this question — What have the Presidents’ Associations been doing on this issue? It’s interesting that they are noticeably silent this issue. Why?
Irritated in the Midwest
Laurie Wolf, Executive Dean, Student Servies at Des Moines Area Community Collge, at 9:35 am EDT on June 1, 2007
Yes all this so called “fine” isn’t doing one thing in my mind helping any student. When I see that fine money really working towards lowering student debt, then we can all give Cuomo his bow he is looking for. Until then, I see him no different that another politician looking to get his name in the headlines as much as possible. So, lenders can’t fund any functions but they can fund Cuomo’s education fund? I’m confused as to what makes the difference here. Not one student is being helped by all of this money that Cuomo is collecting and I think that needs to be made headlines.
DJ, at 9:45 am EDT on June 1, 2007
Advertisement
or search for jobs directly.
The advisor assists with the administration of student financial assistance programs for CSM, including providing outreach, ... see job
For more information and application please visit our website http://www.losrios.edu and ... see job
Consulting Opportunities! Take your career to the next level with CedarCrestone. see job
THIS IS A TEMPORARY ONE-YEAR POSITION. Reporting to the Director of Financial Aid, the Financial Aid Officer provides ... see job
The Director of EOF is responsible for meeting the needs of students as they relate to their educational planning and goals; ... see job
American University’s Financial Aid office is seeking an experienced individual to fill a Financial Aid Counselor position. see job
Roger Williams University is one of the top ranked liberal arts universities in the Northeast and is an Equal Opportunity ... see job
Reporting to the Director of Financial Aid, the Senior Associate Director of Financial Aid is a member of the Office of ... see job
Working Title: Associate Director — Student Financial Aid
Posting Information: The purpose of the WCU ... see job
We are a suburban campus located just outside Philadelphia with easy access from public transportation or several major ... see job
good
Dallas just can’t help himself. Just when he has the opportunity to show a little humility (ie, he had his head handed to him), he’s compelled to dig the heels in.
Contradicting the NY AG’s press release, he denies that NASFAA’s voracious appetite for lender-enabler lucre represents corruption. This is because “we’re not the ones who have been sponsoring the parties or doing the wining and dining.” Well I don’t know what parallel universe Dallas’ NASFAA resides in, but there’s been considerable merriment enjoyed at NASFAA (and regional, and state) conferences over the years, and I doubt that the lender-enabler largesse was motivated purely by bonhomie. It takes two to tango.
finaidfollies, at 9:05 am EDT on June 1, 2007