News, Views and Careers for All of Higher Education
May 11, 2007
Want it on paper? Print this page.
Know someone who’d be interested? Forward this story.
Want to stay informed? Sign up for free daily news e-mail.
Advertisement
The outcome of this case will be of interest to anyone who believes in applying accepted scientific standards for scholarly publications. Facts are the ultimate judge of truth in a scholarly publication, not opinion or politics. Propaganda works are best left to other outlets, not academic presses. Far too long have elite academic institutions used their academic presses for propaganda purposes. They need to be challenged.
Mathew, at 9:25 am EDT on May 11, 2007
Three cheers for Tufts Judicial committee!! Too bad Central Connecticut State University didn’t have the guts to do the right thing with their newspaper — that published the article about how ugly women should just lie there and enjoy a rape.
S.D., at 9:45 am EDT on May 11, 2007
This is a great list of stories. Judicial censorship at Yale, Administrative censorship at Tufts and reader censorship at Framington. Elite publishing houses are certainly having their propaganda stifled.
Weibing, at 11:20 am EDT on May 11, 2007
“Three cheers for Tufts Judicial committee!! Too bad Central Connecticut State University didn’t have the guts to do the right thing with their newspaper — that published the article about how ugly women should just lie there and enjoy a rape.”
How brave you must be to champion censorship at a higher ed. talk forum. Tell me, what punishment should be handed out to people in the general public who express the wrong opinions? What government agency should be deployed to stomp out thought crime? The Ministry of Truth maybe...
Unapoletically Tedious, Math teacher, at 11:20 am EDT on May 11, 2007
SB, If a newspaper wants to say that people should “enjoy” a crime, then your remedy is to publish an editorial saying that they shouldn’t enjoy it. For example, some people say that you should enjoy smoking pot. (Usually possession, not “smoking” is a crime.) Other people say that you shouldn’t. These arguments are rather silly, and strangely enough because you think that they should be suppressed (because, it seems, upon gazing upon them, people might irrevocably change their mind), you have given them legitimacy. Nice going!
I don’t see how any newspaper can “harass” someone. And so what if it is racist? If people disagree with the underlying message they can publish something that rebuts it.
Look folks, I would much rather be around people that make racist jokes and make their prejudices known then people that cover them up with the language of bureaucracy or HR-babble. If these students want to make a permanent record of their racism, I say: go ahead. By censoring them, you are allowing them to remake themselves into “fair-minded” individuals and they can subtlety exercise their discretion on racist grounds without any way of knowing their motivations.
Larry, at 2:25 pm EDT on May 11, 2007
The devil is in the details — there is much more to this story than reported here.
As someone who has spent the last six years investigating controversial science, I have a good sense of the difficulties of new, poorly-understood science.
The challenge of replication in unchartered scientific territory is not to be taken lightly and readily dismissed as “evidence” of non-science. Many people in the field of science, when pushed, will admit that one can never prove a negative, no matter how may attempts fail.
I am also keenly aware of the multitude of human issues in high-profile science; among these, intellectual property, intellectual primacy, competition for funding and grants.
The bold, outspoken criticisms of respected scientists in the popular media do not always make it easy for the lay reader to distinguish between science fact and science politics.
The important question to ask here, is, why all the fuss, and why a Congressional inquiry about who is listed on a science paper?
Steven Krivit
Editor, New Energy Times
Steven B. Krivit, at 2:25 pm EDT on May 11, 2007
Advertisement
or search for jobs directly.
Drake University is a diverse learning community of more than 5,600 students, distinguished by collaborative learning among ... see job
Job Summary The ideal candidate will serve as computer/broadcast lab manager overseeing the operation and ... see job
SPECIALIST SERIES positions are periodically available in the Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior at the University ... see job
Posting Description: The Department of Ethnic Studies at the University of Colorado at Boulder has an ... see job
The Department of Sociology at Appalachian State University invites applications for a tenure-track nine-month faculty ... see job
Loyola College in Maryland is seeking exceptionally qualified applicants for a tenure track faculty position (open rank) in ... see job
Everest College, a respected member of the Corinthian Colleges’ network of schools, is dedicated to helping students ... see job
Eastern Illinois University has a 113 year legacy as an intellectual focal point in central Illinois. Its acclaimed programs ... see job
Sinclair is a comprehensive community college with an enrollment of over 24,000 students that offers career and transfer ... see job
The Faculty of Engineering and Architecture at the American University of Beirut invites applications to fill faculty ... see job
Publishers Duty?
The Yale Press case will ferret out the First Amendment.
Every academic should become informed and express an opinion.
Hopefully, to conclude that the thoughts expressed are those of the author only.
William Sumner Scott, J.D.
Judicial Equality Foundation, Inc.
wss@jefound.org
William Sumner Scott, J.D., at 7:55 am EDT on May 11, 2007