News, Views and Careers for All of Higher Education
March 8, 2007
Yale Divinity School students burned a copy of the Bill of Rights and the Ten Commandments at a recent Ash Wednesday service before marking their foreheads with the ashes – not as protest, they say, but to repent for their own complicity in “the ongoing injustice being perpetuated by our nation.”
“Ash Wednesday is the beginning of Lent where we remember our sins and the ways that we are complicit in evil in our society. As an American, the way that’s most clear today is through the War on Terror and the war on Iraq,” said Christopher Doucot, a first-year master’s student who came up with the idea for the service. About 40 to 45 students, faculty, administrators and local residents attended the service, intended to provide an opportunity for reflection on such topics as secret prisons, “indiscriminate bombings,” domestic spying and torture.
“We were reminding ourselves of our own complicity,” said Doucot. “We’re not pointing fingers at anyone but ourselves.”
A Tuesday Yale Daily News account of the unusual Ash Wednesday service indicated that the ritual burning has “sparked concern among the school’s alumni and some students.” But while it’s obvious that in a country that periodically debates banning flag-burning, such an approach to melding politics and prayer might not prove popular, Doucot said that he has not heard from anyone who was offended, “not a soul.” Rev. Dale Peterson, associate dean of students at Yale Divinity School, said that if there was any controversy, he wasn’t aware of it. It was just a small service, said Reverend Peterson, who was among the attendees, held on a day that at least two much larger services were occurring on campus.
Doucot did acknowledge however that organizers were hoping the action would draw attention to their concerns. “You don’t do things to be provocative,” he said of the service. “But one of the fears I have is being ignored.”
“I absolutely hope people have a visceral reaction ... if they have that strong of a reaction to how a symbol is treated, how it’s burned, then there’s hope that upon reflection, they will have as strong of a visceral reaction to that symbol being violated in practice, which is what searches without warrants do, which is what torture does.”
The service was conducted quietly, without signs or fanfare. Participants stood in a circle and read each commandment or constitutional amendment aloud. Each text was then burned, one by one.
“As the organizers of the service, we believe that the rights and responsibilities held up in those two documents have already been violated by this government, as well as by ourselves as citizens and Christians,” said Tamara Shantz, a third-year divinity student, via e-mail. “The burning was then symbolic of what has already been accomplished, not as a symbol of our lack of respect for the values upheld in the Bill of Rights and the 10 Commandments.”
“It wasn’t burning these documents as if they were not of importance,” explained Reverend Peterson. “It was the exact opposite. We were putting them on our foreheads, after asking God’s forgiveness for not living up to the ideals of them.”
But while Jessica Anschutz, a third-year divinity student who also helped organize the service, said that the first she heard of any controversy was from The Yale Daily News reporter, Tuesday’s article has succeeded in raising the profile of the small service. And not all Yalies, it turns out, are comfortable with the premise behind this particular approach to prayer.
“[Ash Wednesday] is a fully spiritual event; it’s not political in any sense. To pervert it like that is really inappropriate especially at a place like a divinity school,” said Stephen Schmalhofer, a Yale junior and author of the blog, “For God, For Country and For Yale.“
“It seems that to put this in a political context completely removes this from the Christian tradition of the event, which is something that too often happens at the Yale Divinity School ... they have the tendency to manipulate these traditions for political statements, to really rip these traditional devotions from the Christian community in which they were conceived,” Schmalhofer said.
Jonathan Serrato, a sophomore at Yale and the student outreach chair for the St. Thomas More Undergraduate Council, said that while he believes the organizers of the Ash Wednesday service had good intentions and were trying to make a good point, their approach was inappropriate.
“I do believe that there is a call for Christians of all denominations to ‘wake up’ and realize that we must live our faith and do everything in our power to correct what we see as wrong in society, even if the most we can do is try,” Serrato said in an e-mail. “However, I don’t feel that this event was appropriate for the time or the message that they were trying to convey. For me, Lent is a time of personal cleansing and preparation for life after death. Also for me, the ashes given on Ash Wednesday are sacred and come from the blessed palms from the previous year’s Palm Sunday, and I feel that this event could be considered unintentionally disrespectful.”
“It does seem like this is the kind of thing that you have to do very, very delicately, but it appears that this is something they did do delicately,” said William “Beau” Weston, a professor of sociology at Centre College in Kentucky and a Yale Divinity School alumnus.
“It’s actually a pretty classy act. It does raise one’s alarm to have students burning anything, but there are circumstances in which that’s an appropriate thing to do. Ash Wednesday names the context,” said Weston.
“The tradition of using worship as a time to engage the hearts of the people and engage in dramatic action is a rich one,” added Bill McKinney, president of the Pacific School of Religion, a Berkeley seminary, and a professor of American religion. “If you think of liturgy as the work of the people, which is its original meaning, then for the people to express ritually their most powerful hurts and pains and needs, for those who feel that our country’s on the wrong track, it’s very much consistent with the way worship works.”
Want it on paper? Print this page.
Know someone who’d be interested? Forward this story.
Want to stay informed? Sign up for free daily news e-mail.
Advertisement
This is one of those “you had to have been there” stories.
While I was at YDS in the 1970s, vibrant experimental worship was often attempted. The most recent edition of “Reflections” magazine, for example, deals with “The Future of the Prophetic Voice.” So, there is always going to be that strand of counter-hegemonic (Gramsci) liturgy and theologizing.
The problem isn’t the students, but the larger culture that they are a part of.
Glen McGhee, MDiv. ‘78, at 8:15 am EST on March 8, 2007
Agreed with bystander... I respect them for having strong convictions, but burning these two texts makes them seem quite juvenile and diminishes their protest.
K.T., at 9:30 am EST on March 8, 2007
What a fascinating juxtaposition of views on the meaning of ritual. The scandal of the alternative service was its particularity — its emblems became the stuff of an expression of sorrow for particular sins; meanwhile, larger services for the wider community seemed to have been concerned more about “our/my sinfulness in general,” which often is a kind of denial of “my sins in particular.” The smaller service might have become meaninglessly self-absorbed but didn’t. The larger services seem to have accomplished their conventional task of acknowledging a truism.
Ron George, Project Writer at Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi, at 9:35 am EST on March 8, 2007
Dear Bystander,It is unfortunate that you find political speech tiresome when uttered by university students. A fundamental purpose of attending university is to gain a better understanding of the basic philosophies and tenets of our civilization, our culture and our government. Education should cause students to examine the actions of our government and our leaders and to gain a better understanding of the workings of our society. It should also promote an ethic of personal responsibility and accountability. This act, though probably quite heartfelt, is inherently passive and likely does more to satisfy the participant’s personal sense of injustice rather than to stir society or to spark meaningful debate. But your flippant chiding seems more an act of general hostility than serious criticism. The burnings were “an invitation to reflection on such topics as secret prisons, ‘indiscriminate bombings,’ domestic spying and torture.” It may well be that you believe that these things are justified or perhaps you don’t believe they exist. No matter where you stand on these issues, they rock the core of who we are as Americans and what we stand for. The invitation to serious consideration of these issues should not be so casually dismissed.
Susan Gutman, at 10:20 am EST on March 8, 2007
Bystander. . . what’s really tiresome are people who comment without reading the damn articles. You obviously didn’t or, if you did, you didn’t understand it.
What’s Really Tiresome, at 10:25 am EST on March 8, 2007
It is good to see the Yale Divinity students admission of their complicity in our acceptance, as a Christian nation, a government that tortures, that limits human rights, et cetera and yet professes to be a Christian nation.
L M Detmer, at 12:05 pm EST on March 8, 2007
Well, why not a symbolic burning? It’s not as if, in reality, these documents haven’t already been perverted beyond recognition. Besides, nothing else seems to be working to stop BushCo from setting the Middle East desert aflame. If someone has a better idea let’s hear it.
diana, at 12:05 pm EST on March 8, 2007
I have nothing against burning pieces of paper. That’s not the problem. The problem is that this act reeks of hypocrisy.
“We were reminding ourselves of our own complicity,” said Doucot. “We’re not pointing fingers at anyone but ourselves.”
Yet what do they complain of: The GOVERNMENT"S “secret prisons, ‘indiscriminate bombings,’ domestic spying and torture.” Did any of these students wiretap anyone? Did they torture anyone? Did they bomb anyone? No. So in what sense are the bearing witness to their own sins? None. In fact they are pumping themselves up with self-righteous pride and disguising it as ashes and humility. If in fact their only “sin” is, as they claim, that they live in a sinful society, and are “complicit” with it, the solution is obvious and easy (as opposed to dealing with personal sin). LEAVE! Do the penance that fits the crime. Otherwise let the rest of us alone.
Jon Burack, at 12:25 pm EST on March 8, 2007
Unless you are a tax resister,then YOU are torturing,bombing and spying on people.Just because you pay someone to do it does not wash the blood from your own hands.
Jacqueline Allen, at 1:16 pm EST on March 8, 2007
I find Jon Burack’s charge of hypocrisy to be absurd. Do you know what it means to be complicit in something? Anytime we stand idly by while injustices are perpetrated in our names, anytime we contribute—through hate or simple indifference—to a culture of violence, we are complicit in the acts of that larger culture. Taking a moment to reflect on all the subtle and not so subtle ways each of us adds fuel to that particular fire seems completely appropriate, and commendable, to me. After all, haven’t we all been guilty at one time or another or resorting (even just in our own private thoughts) to simplistic stereotypes—muttering epithets under our breaths when a person *unlike* us cuts us off in traffic or says something we don’t like? Don’t we often find it all too easy to respond to a person’s physical markers, like skin color or apparent sexual orientation, than to the individual behavior we don’t like or approve of? And aren’t these things completely at odds with what we profess by our reverence for the Ten Commandments or the Constitution?
Besides, burning something in effigy is quite different from burning an object we love because the latter is a sacrifice and a sacrament.
Finally, telling people to either love America or leave it is far more hypocritical than what these divinity students have done. Had the Revolutionaries of 1776 followed this maxim, we surely wouldn’t be here today. This country was built on freedom of dissent and unpopular speech remains the only kind in need of protection. I applaud these students.
A.Green, University of Georgia, at 1:50 pm EST on March 8, 2007
The burning of the Ten Commandments and the Bill of Rights is entirely consistent with the practice of expressing righteous anger. Remember, Moses breaking to pieces the tablets on which the Ten Commandments were written when he saw his people worshiping idols? Remember what Jesus did when he saw the officials of the temple turning that sacred place into a trading post? Living a life that is contrary to the values of the Ten Commandments and the Bill of Rights, while upoholding these documents as sacred, amounts to idolatry. It is quite appropriate to turn these idols into ashes and apply it to one’s forehead in shame, humility, repentence, and rigtheous anger at some of the famous graudates of Yale who are committing idolatry.
Mathew
Mathew, at 2:10 pm EST on March 8, 2007
How about burning the people concerned? (Glyph of hyperbole).
For the sin of gross ignorance, for starters.
S.M. Stirling, at 2:55 pm EST on March 8, 2007
” .. As an American, the way that’s most clear today is through the War on Terror and the war on Iraq ..”
Forget these?
1. The war on traditional values, which has economically and socio-culturally-ruined two generations, by deterring a minimal level of discipline, focus on excellence, and personal responsibility.
2. The governmental nanny-state, with a trial lawyer-solution for ever problem and a tax on every activity.
3. Rampant, bizarre, and absurd moral relativism that attempts to compare GWB with Hitler, Stalin, et al.
Leonard Washington, at 4:36 pm EST on March 8, 2007
The comment by Mr. Washington discloses that there is some lucid thought left in America.
Money + alcohol and other drug consumption = no moral conduct.
Power + Organized Religion = absolute right to act.
Combine them and the general public does not have a chance. That is where Yale and other educational institutions come into play. They can move to become part of the solution.
They must lead the way to separate the components.
William Sumner Scott, J.D.
Judicial Equality Foundation, Inc.
William Sumner Scott, J.D., at 11:25 am EDT on March 11, 2007
Advertisement
or search for jobs directly.
Job Description: Physical Education teaching position responsible for teaching Health Education courses ... see job
Saint Louis University is a Jesuit Catholic University. Through teaching, research, health care and community service, Saint ... see job
School of Social Sciences Department of Cognitive Sciences Human Behavioral Genetics Position: Assistant Professor, ... see job
San Bernardino Community College District EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY Position Information Title Instructor, Geography Position ... see job
Join one of the finest regional universities in the nation. James Madison University, home to 18,000 + students, welcomes you ... see job
Salary: Commensurate with qualifications and experience Date of appointment: August 18, 2009 Responsibilities: Tenure-track ... see job
Join the Pack! A community with nearly 8,000 faculty and staff, and 30,000 students. NC State is one of the largest employers ... see job
Posting Description: The University of Colorado at Denver and Health Sciences Center (UCDHSC) seeks a ... see job
The University of Minnesota is a premier employer and a talent magnet attracting leading faculty and staff from around the ... see job
Augustana College is a private, selective liberal arts college located on a 150-acre campus near the Mississippi River in ... see job
So tiresome, what the college kids want to burn to shock someone. Burn the Ten Commandments? Why not try actually living by them, or anyway some of them? It would accomplish much of what they might hope for. Burn the Bill of Rights? And so then what? Burn the Magna Carta? Why not the Baltimore Catechism? The Torah? (They would not dare burn anything Islamic groups would be offended by because those folks take their icons and payback seriously.) I am baffled by what all that burning up of things has to do with divinity studies. I thought students had to be astonishingly intelligent in order to be admitted to Yale, but this all sounds pretty common—act outrageous and grab headlines—it’s so easy that anyone can do it. Who IS on the Yale admissions board anyway—maybe I should send in an application. I’m sure I am capable of cliched demonstrations if not profound thinking.
bystander, at 8:00 am EST on March 8, 2007