Advertisement

News, Views and Careers for All of Higher Education

Cracking Down on the Unaccredited

As states have cracked down on licensing requirements, for-profit college and universities without federally recognized accreditation have concentrated in states where loopholes in regulations, weak laws or lax enforcement allow them to operate and even, in some cases, trumpet their status as “state licensed” in their quests to attract students online from all over the world.

Alabama officials were the latest to announce their intention to strengthen the state’s licensing and review procedures last week, joining policymakers in their neighbor Mississippi, where the Legislature last year approved a bill granting district attorneys the right to take to court those Mississippi-based institutions offering degrees without approval by the state’s Commission on College Accreditation. If Alabama and Mississippi, two of a handful of states that have served as havens for unaccredited entities, succeed in their quests to tighten the oversight of these institutions, there may soon be few friendly states left for them to call home.

“If you take a look at the basic situation across the country, if Mississippi and Alabama actually make progress, you’re down to a few states where these places can operate legally,” said Alan Contreras, administrator of the Oregon Student Assistance Commission’s Office of Degree Authorization and an observer of the national regulatory picture. “That doesn’t mean they won’t operate illegally,” he quickly added.

In Alabama, two agencies charged with approving institutions have announced a plan to seek legislation to consolidate a split regulatory structure, and to close a loophole that lets unapproved institutions operate with only a corporate license.

“What we have in Alabama is a unique, bifurcated system that is not found in any other state. In other words, the licensure law, the licensure act, the administration of it is housed in another agency, named the Alabama Department of Postsecondary Education,” said Elizabeth French, director of the office of institutional effectiveness and planning in the Alabama Commission on Higher Education.

“In 1979, there was a portion of our statute that was amended giving the Commission on Higher Education, which is a different agency, the responsibility for doing the programmatic review of all institutions coming into the state as foreign corporations. It did not give us the programmatic review of all institutions that were to be licensed, only those who were coming in whose headquarters were domiciled outside the state.” The two agencies typically work closely together through an articulation agreement, French said, but nothing legally binds the Postsecondary Department to accept the Commission’s recommendation on licensure based on its review.

“It has become extremely complex, and we are not convinced that it is the most effective way of doing business anymore,” French said.

The Alabama Commission on Higher Education is now working with the Alabama Department of Postsecondary Education to craft legislation to consolidate the review and licensure processes within one agency. The entire process would preferably be housed under the commission’s authority, said Joan Davis, general counsel for the Department of Postsecondary Education.

Gregory Fitch, executive director of the Alabama Commission on Higher Education, said legislation meant to streamline and strengthen the process has been drafted, but the commission has not yet found a sponsor to introduce it during the upcoming legislative session, which begins in March.

Furthermore, Fitch said, even if both agencies collaborate to reject an institution’s bid for licensure, an entity would only need to pay $1,500 to be licensed as a corporation in the state – and then, under current law, could proceed with granting degrees with Alabama’s stamp. “If you were a student out there, looking for an opportunity or a special program or even a point of least resistance, you see something licensed by the state of Alabama, your first thought would be ‘good, this must be legitimate.’ But then all of the sudden, they’ve got your money and they disappear,” said Fitch, who hopes to work with other state agencies to develop legislation closing that loophole and requiring that all degree-granting entities be approved by an educational agency before being incorporated in the state.

Meanwhile, in Mississippi, the new legislation seems to be having an effect. Since the state gave authorities power to go after unaccredited institutions, seven of the 11 institutions on a list of those operating in Mississippi without state approval have said they have ceased operations in the state, said Juliette Wilson, special assistant attorney general with the Mississippi Office of the Attorney General. In December, the state sued the American University of Human Sciences, formerly known as the American University of Hawaii, which the state of Hawaii filed suit against in 2003, Wilson said. The institution eschews accreditation on its Web site, arguing that, “The American University of Human Sciences, as a global university does not require to be accredited.”

Although Wilson said the institution has dissolved its operations in Mississippi, she plans to continue to move forward, after a 30-day procedural delay, because the operations were not dissolved until after the institution was served with a notification to cease operations in the state. Wilson expects to file suit against two other entities, which she declined to name, by the end of the month.

Meanwhile, the Mississippi Commission on College Accreditation has not yet made a determination after a November meeting to hear an appeal by Madison University regarding the commission’s decision to deny its request for provisional accreditation, said Annie Mitchell, spokeswoman for the Mississippi Institutions of Higher Learning. On its Web site, Madison describes itself as accredited by the World Association of Universities and Colleges, but notes that the “private accrediting body” is not recognized by the U.S. Education Department or any government agency.

“Historically, anytime states toughen legislation, there is fall-out in other states,” said Larry Tremblay, acting deputy commissioner for academic and student affairs for the Board of Regents in Louisiana, another state that has strengthened its once-lax regulations. “Historically, questionable institutions seek greener pastures, and I will tell you that in the mid-80s, when California strengthened their law, we ended up with somewhere around 10 institutions with either California in their name or Pacific in their name or Western in their name.”

But this time around, more institutions may find themselves based on the Caribbean’s lapping shores. Contreras said that only a few states – including Hawaii – might prove to be friendly ground for unaccredited, unapproved institutions if they find themselves pushed out of Mississippi and Alabama. Wyoming and Idaho, two of the other traditional strongholds for these types of institutions, have both recently strengthened their regulations.

Contreras added that California, where the current regulatory structure will be shuttered July 1 after Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger vetoed a bill to extend its life by a year, could prove to be a welcome home if nothing is initiated to replace the Private Postsecondary and Vocational Education program, which Schwarzenegger wrote upon vetoing the bill is plagued with “fundamental problems” that have been “studied extensively and well documented over the years.”

But Contreras cautioned that new regulations, by themselves, will do little to keep unaccredited institutions out. “Let’s assume that these are reasonably good statutes. I think the crucial issue is whether they are enforced. You can have a really good statute but if you don’t have any enforcement ability, it doesn’t do you any good. That has been the problem in California.”

Elizabeth Redden

Got something to say?


Want it on paper? Print this page.
Know someone who’d be interested? Forward this story.
Want to stay informed? Sign up for free daily news e-mail.

Advertisement

Comments

Bar to Entry

Regulation is often nothing more than a method to tax or to bar entry into business.

Care must be given to allow start-ups the opportunity to succeed and labor to be trained. School placement statistics speak volumes of the quality of the effort. The informed student asks those questions in advance.

Costs must be low and the regulations limited to only the quality of the advertising and truthfulness of the statistics published. The consumer protection laws adequately enforced are sufficient to protect the public. Education regulation aimed at schools that train lower job entry level people is mostly smoke.

William Sumner Scott, J.D.

Judicial Equality Foundation, Inc.

wss@jefound.org

http://jefound.org

William Sumner Scott, J.D., at 8:35 am EST on January 18, 2007

Broken Gatekeeping “Triad”

Most, if not all, of the problems with diploma mills stem from the fact that there are no national minimum standards for colleges and universities in the US. There are no minimum standards, and the gatekeeping mechanisms for higher education in this country are like a picket fence gate with a broken hinge that is stuck in the open position.

The so-called “triad” of gatekeeping (comprised of the US Department of Education, state governments, and the accrediting associations) is largely ornamental, and in my view, represents a violation of the fiduciary responsibilities identified by Congress in Sec. 496 of the Higher Education Act. Each of the three legs of the triad lacks accountability and each has its own weaknesses. No other monopolistic industry that I know of operates with such a lack of oversight, except perhaps the medical and legal professions.

As part of the HE gatekeeping triad, state licensing requirements tend to be perfunctory, and rely much too heavily on accreditation by the regional and national accreditors. It is therefore a mistake to confuse state licensing requirements with the approval process conducted by the accrediting guilds.

Laxity at the state level in the South is not new. The story is often told of the men that chartered themselves as a college in a Southern state. They granted themselves degrees, and then quickly disbanded the college (Nevins, 1958). It is sad that this can still go on.

Glen S. McGhee, Dir., at FHEAP, at 8:55 am EST on January 18, 2007

Critique of accreditation criteria

Is there an organization or website that offers a critical analysis of the criteria used by accrediting bodies? I would imagine that some criteria are relevant to ensuring a quality education while some are not.

John Sarvey, at 10:05 am EST on January 18, 2007

Accreditation criteria

America’s historical approach to accreditation has not been grounded in a process of documenting quantitative measures of quality, and only recently, with the North Central Association’s initiative with AQIP (Academic Quality Improvement Program) has the notion of continuous quality improvement (CQI) been brought into the educational accreditation mix in a formal way. The traditional model of self-reported and peer-reviewed indicators of institutional integrity has come under severe scruteny of late, and change is in the wind. One of the most troubling dimensions of accreditation and program certification is the potential for engaging in a form of social engineering, whereby an association decides to define quality in terms that mirror specific social or political objectives — NCATE being a case in point.

Russell Kitchner, accreditation consultant, at 11:10 am EST on January 18, 2007

No Pirates of the Caribbean

I didn’t understand why the article included, “But this time around, more institutions may find themselves based on the Caribbean’s lapping shores.” It was sort of tucked in there without explanation.

Other than a few questionable institutions based on St. Kitts, the Caribbean’s history isn’t any worse on this sort of thing than the U.S. And through Caricom there’s now movement toward accreditation standards on a regional level.

Steve Foerster, Director of Instructional Technology at Free Curricula Center, at 1:26 pm EST on January 18, 2007

Caricom is a drone in the world of honeybees. At their rate of progress they will finish accrediting existing schools in about 20 years. The Caribbean is in need of some educational innovation not further inertia. St. Kitts had/has an accreditaion system in place but it was discounted by many as not credible for no particular reason. Perhaps because it was not American or British.

Dennis Ruhl, at 3:00 pm EST on January 18, 2007

Re: John

John queried: “Is there an organization or website that offers a critical analysis of the criteria used by accrediting bodies? I would imagine that some criteria are relevant to ensuring a quality education while some are not.”

You would think so, but there is not.

For one thing, the self-study, peer-review self-improvement accrediting model used for access to Title IV funds doesn’t include quantitative thresholds or “bright line standards.” A good example of this are the December 2006 changes in which the Southern Association voted to side-line faculty qualification requirements for their members: http://sacscoc.org/pdf/Proposed%20Principles.pdf.

Any assessment mode that revolves around ‘self-study’ and ‘peer review’ is apt to suffer from a lack of objectivity, especially when there are no minimum standards. It is for this reason that accreditation is felt to be incestuous and self-serving.

Dissatisfaction with the lack of transparency is one reason for the recent push for accreditation change. But the accrediting guilds have been around for a long time: in this country they have been around for one hundred years, while the European medieval model of the university guild is more than 800 years old. Change, I think, is unlikely.

Glen S. McGhee, DIr., at Florida Higher Education Accountability Project, at 3:25 pm EST on January 18, 2007

Anyone who thinks Calif. has a really good state statute should read the Operations and Administrative Monitor report posted at bppve.ca.gov. Not one good thing about the State laws in 187 pages and this is from an Independent Analyst hired by the State.

Robert, at 5:20 pm EST on January 18, 2007

Plenty of Pirates of the Caribbean...

...however the Caribbean is not alone. Panama and Vanuatu appear to be flavour of the month at the moment, taking over from the Seychelles and Dominica. Basically, anyone with a pulse and a valid credit card can create their own ‘University Company’ in these offshore jurisdictions of convenience. So long as we have the internet and lax oversight of the word ‘university’ in business names legislation, this problem will be with us for a very very long time.

George Brown, Mr at HigherEd Consulting (Australasia), at 6:25 pm EST on January 19, 2007

The Problem isn’t Supply, it’s Demand

Just like with drugs, trying to eliminate supply in the face of rampant demand is futile. In the Cyberspace Age, there are no limits to the number of “places” these entities may hide. In times past, a diploma mill needed a physical location to send and receive mail. No more. Now, all that’s required is a website and a means to accept credit card payments. The key, therefore is to cut off demand. And that sits with the consumers of these degrees: employers. As long as they—and their agents, the HR community—fail to eliminate from consideration employees and candidates with false or misleading credentials, this problem will continue (and, indeed, grow). There’s always another hillside to start a new poppy field.

Rich Douglas, Ph.D., at 11:30 am EST on February 5, 2007

Advertisement

 Jobs Related to Cracking Down on the Unaccredited

or search for jobs directly.

Business Faculty #10306
Daytona State College

Located on the beautiful east coast of Florida, Daytona State College offers competitive compensation, along with great ... see job

Open Rank
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill seeks to fill a full-time Open Rank (tenure Track/Tenured/Fixed-term) ... see job

Drafting Professor
Merced College

The professor will provide instruction of all courses within the Drafting Program as well as supervise and coordinate various ... see job

FT 9/11 Mo Faculty — 2025A
Saint Louis University

Saint Louis University is a Jesuit Catholic University. Through teaching, research, health care and community service, Saint ... see job

2008/09 Lecturer or Teaching Specialist: Hindi-Urdu or Sanskrit — Asian Languages and Literatures
University of Minnesota, Twin Cities

The University of Minnesota is a premier employer and a talent magnet attracting leading faculty and staff from around the ... see job

Tenured/Tenure Track Faculty
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Nursing invites you to join the faculty of a nationally ranked ... see job

Professor of Liberal Arts (English)
Savannah College of Art and Design

The Savannah College of Art and Design seeks candidates for a full-time faculty position in the Liberal Arts Department to ... see job

Assistant Professor, Psychology
University of Denver



Job Summary: Two Assistant Professor, Tenure-Line Positions. We are a highly collaborative, ... see job

Associate Director of Corporate Education, Enrollment Management — Position #2966
University of La Verne

The University of La Verne, with its rich 118-year history and California’s pioneer leader in corporate education, has an ... see job

Clinical Assistant/Clinical Associate Professor/Pharmacy Practice
Lebanese American University

School of Pharmacy Department: Pharmacy Practice Campus: Byblos Vacancy date: Spring 2009 see job