News, Views and Careers for All of Higher Education
Dec. 8, 2006
So much for the idea that stipends pay for graduate school. As deans gathered in Washington for the annual meeting of the Council of Graduate Schools, one topic of concern buzzing through the air was how much borrowing students must do these days.
“We have seen much more emphasis on borrowing, especially among underrepresented minorities,” said Kenneth Redd, director of research and policy analysis with the Council of Graduate Schools. Redd noted that funding from grants and assistantships has not risen fast enough to cover increasing educational expenses. Underrepresented minorities are affected disproportionately by borrowing to cover costs. And high debts will limit these students’ ability to complete their degree in a timely fashion, as many begin to attend part time.
For the 1995-6 academic year, the average price of attendance for a master’s program was $9,272 and $13,423 for a doctoral program. By 2003-4, the annual price of attendance had jumped to $14,825 annually for a master’s and $20,803 for a doctoral program – a rise of 60 percent and 56 percent, respectively. Across this same time period, an increasing proportion of students began taking out loans to finance their education. Around 43 percent of minorities took out an average of $19,103 in loans annually to finance a year of doctoral study in 2003-4, while only 34 percent of white doctoral student required a loan, averaging $17,987. The size of these loans, Redd mentioned, is almost double the amount from the mid-’90s.
The difference in debt load between white and minority graduate students can be explained partly by the small number of blacks and Latinos in science and technology, which receive the bulk of federal spending on graduate programs. Of white students who went on to graduate school in 2003 -4, about 19 percent acquired degrees in science and technology, while only 9 percent of African Americans did the same. But even within these fields African American doctoral students were less likely to be awarded assistantships and more apt to need loans than whites.
Upon receiving their doctorate, around 65 percent of minority grad students carried a culmulative debt averaging $51,263. A slightly lower percentage of whites (58 percent) had accumulated $51,648 in debt to earn the same degree.
“The concern is, How long students can continue borrowing at these rates?” Redd asked.
Following Redd’s presentation, Lisa Tedesco, dean of the graduate school of arts and sciences at Emory University, acknowledged that loans can create barriers and advised administrators to consider counseling students on debt management. “If it is a fact of life that students will have debt, then how can we lessen the impact?”
Want it on paper? Print this page.
Know someone who’d be interested? Forward this story.
Want to stay informed? Sign up for free daily news e-mail.
Advertisement
And what is the solution? All the evidence points to sky-rocketing costs, surging ever higher and higher. How do we bring it All back down to earth?
The problem is that we are not managing the driver for these costs, credential inflation. Loans, tuition costs, all these are simply tracking the loss of value of degrees.
A column in the Wall Street Journal recently pondered “Why It Takes a Doctorate To Beat Inflation” (October 19, 2006; Page A2). According to David Wessel, “... [G]etting a bachelor’s degree is no longer a guarantee of raises big enough to beat inflation. Although the best-paid college grads are doing well, wages of college grads have fallen on average, after adjusting for inflation, in the past five years. The only group that enjoyed rising wages between 2000 and 2005 were the small slice with [JD, MD, MBA] graduate degrees.” Those with masters degrees, however, lost %1.8; those with PhDs gained %2.9. In relation to monetary inflation, college degrees have recently begun to experience a gradual but noticeable devaluation.
No one, not one educational foundation has started to look at this problem, let alone recommend policy that would help to manage it. This may not be possible, but we have no choice than to attempt it.
Glen McGhee, FHEAP, at 9:25 am EST on December 8, 2006
A professor once said to our class, “You don’t have to be a genius to get a Ph.D. You just need time and money. It takes time, but if you can stick with it, then it will happen.”
I guess those of us without time and/or money are just out of luck.
kgotthardt, at 12:00 pm EST on December 8, 2006
The person who said you can get a Ph.D. with only time and money was an idiot. False modesty among academics nauseates me. You must be smarter than average to finish promptly and do work that will get you a tenure track job. Permitting people who are not smart to slug away at doctorates for 8-12 yrs is abusive, in my opinion. Pretending that those who write mediocre dissertations will get tenure-track jobs is also abusive. In my field, if your dissertation doesn’t yield several journal articles, you will have no change of being hired, much less attaining tenure, even at a teaching institution. When we encourage untalented individuals to pursue doctoral study, we encourage false hopes that will produce the kind of bitterness I read every day in the comment section here. It isn’t worth the time and money to pursue a doctorate if you aren’t smart because you will go nowhere in academia with your degree unless you have brains.
Perry, at 8:35 pm EST on December 9, 2006
I took out loans for over $150K to fund my BA and my two MA’s. How could I possibly afford a Ph.D.
David, at 2:36 pm EST on December 10, 2006
I have taught for 25 years. During that time I earned an artists performance diploma, a BS in education, an MFA, and a PhD. I borrowed for them all. I paid off all of my student loans except for the one I am currently paying for, the PhD. I have never had a job in academia because I could never afford to support my family on the meager wages paid by the colleges. Recently, I was offered a position at my local Community College. The hours were great, the job was perfect for me and they knew it. When I asked about pay, I found that the top pay offered for the job was $20,000 less than the public middle school teacher who was teaching the same subject in the building next door. At some point we need to realize that the educational demands placed upon individuals who want to teach in college are simply too high, too costly, and too time consuming for the return.
Ken, at 6:20 pm EST on December 10, 2006
I was lucky not to have to take out loans for college, so I started grad school with a clean slate (except my car loan), but I was able to get through six years of grad school in a social sciences department without any additional debt. The department, like many nationally, paid me about 11,000/yr to serve as an RA and then a TA, and I doubled my stipend in the last two years by teaching an online course at the same time. I also tutored students in English on an hourly basis.
While I think many students get into debt in grad school for legitimate reasons (family to support, pre-existing debt payments, etc.), I can’t help but think that many end up in debt either because they unwisely chose to attend doctoral programs without tuition remission and stipends (even in the social sciences, most strong departments offer this to almost all of their students), or because they simply live beyond their means.
I would say that it is unwise to attend a doctoral program unless the program offers most of its students a stipend and tuition, and it is unwise to think that you can support more than yourself on a stipend. Even supporting only yourself, expect to live very frugally, giving up things that many see as required, like cable TV, a nice car, dining out every week, etc. If people stay away from programs without funding, this problem will start to shrink. The nice side benefit of it is that weaker programs will start to shut down if they have no applicants, decreasing the glut of unqualified Ph.D.’s on the market each year.
This doesn’t deal with issues surrounding expensive, unfunded terminal Masters programs, but unless the degree is career-specific (MSW, for instance), the value of such programs is questionable. If possible, start in a doctoral program that has funding and leave once you’ve done the MA/bypass/whatever if you don’t like it.
Just like credit card debt, “victims” are usually those who made some bad financial choices along the way.
QuakerProf, at 6:20 pm EST on December 10, 2006
Like any investment you would expect a good Return on the Investment (ROI), if the ROI is not justifiable then don’t do make the investment. Most people who decided to earn a Ph.D. did it to challenge themselves not for the money, and obviously academics is a wrong place to look for money.
The demand for Ph.D.’s outside academics (Industries, Corporations and Research institutes and Government) continue to be good and so is the salary, unless colleges and universities step up their game and become competitive, the brightest and the best will not go into academics.
Ben Kukoyi,Ph.D. (Candidate), Assistant Professor/Clinical Scientist, at 5:05 am EST on December 11, 2006
I’m with David...how do people get away with borrowing only $20,000? I’m in debt well over $150,000 since I started college when I was an adult with 2 small children. I wasn’t rich (far from it), but never qualified for any type of grant. I hope to defend my dissertataion in the spring of 2007, but it took me 7 years BECAUSE I tend to my personal affairs as well. I am—and was—a single parent, had childcare costs, car payments, mortgage payments, worked 3 jobs sometimes, my mother broke both her hips at different times, my son had brain surgery, etc...so don’t tell me that I’m an idiot or any other name because I wasn’t fortunate to finish within a certain number of years! How dare you! People and family always come first. Ikept at it and with the help ofprofessorsr who loved me enogh to encourage me to keep going, I did. And, I am proud of that!
Linda Kvamme, at 10:45 am EST on December 11, 2006
Linda,
Perry’s comments are out of line, but in reference to your debt, I would restate my point, which does not imply that you’re an idiot or anything else. It’s about financial choices. The reason for your debt is not that the funding system for graduate school is horribly bad, but rather that you made the choice to go to graduate school while supporting a family, and it seems (from your comments) that you attended a program without financial support.
I admire your persistence and your willingness to take on great debt under very difficult circumstances, but you’re not a victim of that debt- you chose it several times (applying to an unfunded program, perhaps choosing a car that was beyond your means, etc.). The grad school funding system is more than sufficient, even generous, for people in situations closer to the average for incoming students (no family to support alone, no health emergencies). Many schools even offer benefits like child care, health insurance, and cheap family housing to grad students- if you chose a school without these benefits, that’s fine, but it’s still your choice.
QuakerProf, at 5:20 pm EST on December 11, 2006
Unfortunately Perry’s comments are not isolated but well spread in the academic field. Education has been always a way that wealthy classes keep their position to degrade others. I obtained a BS while working full time from a prestigious university even though people told me constantly that that was an impossible. I got a loan and obtained my MS while working full time, and I am working on my dissertation while working full time and with a $50,000 loan. If loans are a way to show rich people like Perry that poor people like me not only have more brains than them but they are better human beings then loans are welcome any time.
Jairo Garcia, Engineer, at 1:42 pm EST on December 26, 2006
When the DOE endorses books about careers and the books color a picture projecting a great career outlook but then after graduating you find out that the career outlook is in reality bismol. Then there is something wrong. The system is like a social program going into it aimed to help the poor and financially challenged. But then immediately upon graduation, these generous and helpful people turn into ruthless bill collectors. Who has a job when they get out of college? Who understands how this system works. We go to college because we are ignorant and want an education. And that is exactly what we get. Our first lesson is that we have been duped by a system that funds their colleges, makes them filty rich, and you pay for it. So instead of ending the cycle of poverty it makes sure that you have no money to give your children all the advantages that you didnt have. And then, you get to wear a “Scarlet letter” for the rest of your life as you struggle to stay ahead of the ruthless and unethical, not to mention inhumane and immoral collection agencies and policies. Which by the way are owned by the same people who lend you the money. No lending institution in America nor does any collection institution have the benefits and powers that these student loans collectors have. It simply is not civilized and it is un American.Never since the Revolutionary War have Americans felt the oppressive powers of rich “robber barons” ie, Sallie Mae, than we have today with a system which was intended to help the very people it destroys.
kyle hombs, at 5:45 am EST on February 8, 2007
This discussion tends to get really heated. Here is my modest opinion from a current grad student and staff member working in financial aid at a large research university... The problem starts during a lot of students undergrad degrees. The government still calculates inflated EFC’s for students and in turn there are a great number of students who are not eilg for any aid but loans even though their parents cannot afford to help with college costs... these parents usually have too much debt themselves (cars, house, credit cards). So students take out what ever loans are available to cover the costs— federal loan limits are a joke— $5500 total for one year for a dependent undergrad junior? What college can you go to for that amt? Pell amt haven’t been raised in years and now private loan sharks are stepping in and “filling the gap” while lining their pockets. The average undergrad graduates with $19,000 in debt over. And they are not living above their means... they are just trying to pay the rising tuition costs at colleges that have less and less merit aid to give. Unless you are dirt poor (ie in gov. assist programs) you will more than likely not get any free money. So then you head off to grad school (cause less face it, a BA is the new High school diploma) already $20,000 in debt. It would take no time at all to get to $60,000. Grad schools just don’t have the funds anymore. Scholarships are a joke, and even GA, RA and TA positions can be hard to come by and don’t always cover the cost of living.
Jessica, MSW student, at 3:10 pm EST on February 20, 2007
Advertisement
or search for jobs directly.
The Information Technology Services Department at Plymouth State University seeks a dynamic person who can work in a ... see job
We’re committed to our vision of becoming the best comprehensive community college in the United States. see job
Hofstra University’s Department of Sociology invites applications for an anticipated tenure-track position at the rank of ... see job
Located just north of Houston, Texas, our five campuses serve 1,400 square miles. Our student enrollment is nearly 50,000 in ... see job
Office of Development General Description: The Associate Director of Development will advance the mission of Miami University ... see job
Western Carolina University, a constituent member of the University of North Carolina system, seeks an experienced financial ... see job
Everest College is a world-class educational institution and a rapidly growing part of Corinthian Colleges, Inc. At ... see job
General Purpose
Reporting to the Director of Career Development at the Yale School of Management, lead the ... see job
We’re committed to our vision of becoming the best comprehensive community college in the United States. see job
The Masdar Institute of Science and Technology, dedicated to premier engineering research and the provision of a definitive, ... see job
Lots of croc. tears. My grad school debt exceeded my first four years’ salaries: I owed $15K with salaries that started at $llK, then $ll.4K, $12.5K, and $14.5K. Only in year five did my assoc. prof. salary exceed my debt load. Ten years later it was paid off, but I still had other “debts"—credit cards, mortgage, car payment, orthodontia... Why all the tears over borrowing for an intangible asset while never mentioning on-going debts for depreciating assets?
An Old Duffer, Professor of English, at 8:50 am EST on December 8, 2006