Advertisement

Advertisement

News, Views and Careers for All of Higher Education

International Recovery

Since 9/11, educators focused on international exchange have generally seen American higher education facing a crisis: Colleges’ ability to attract foreign students has been seriously hurt by tougher visa rules and increased competition from other countries.

Data being released today as part of the annual “Open Doors” study by the Institute of International Education, however, show that total enrollments effectively stabilized in 2005-6, following two years of declines. Total enrollment accounts for both new and continuing students, and changes in visa policies and recruitment practices show up primarily in the new student figures. There, the picture is more encouraging and suggests that a rebound is on the way — and that total numbers are poised for a significant increase in the years ahead.

The new data show an 8 percent increase in new students from other countries. And a survey of colleges for fall 2006 data (less precise than the detailed information available for the previous year) found that more than half of American colleges are reporting increases in international enrollments, while only 20 percent are reporting declines.

“I think everyone is relieved to see that the declines of the past few years have leveled out, and we’re seeing a bump up in new students,” said Peggy Blumenthal, executive vice president of the Institute of International Education. “It’s going to take a while for the new cohort to work its way through the system, but we’re going to see increases.”

In 2005-6, India maintained its position as the top country in sending students to the United States, although its totals declined by 4.9 percent. The 76,503 Indian students at American colleges in 2005-6 made up 13.5 percent of all foreign students in the country. Of the top 20 countries sending students, Korea (#3) saw its enrollments increase by 10.3 percent, Hong Kong (#12) was up by 9.3 percent, and Nepal (#19) was up by 24.7 percent. Japan, Turkey, Colombia and Pakistan reported the largest declines — all between 5 and 10 percent.

The Institute of International Education also releases data on American students who enroll in programs in other countries — and reported that 205,983 students did so in 2004-5 — an increase of 7.7 percent from the previous year and double the number from a decade ago. Western Europe remains by far the most popular destination, but some of the largest percentage increases (on small bases) are to countries elsewhere: Argentina, Brazil, China and India.

The numbers for total enrollments of foreign students in the United States show that in this decade, enrollments were hitting unprecedented levels prior to 9/11 — both in total numbers and share of the student body at American institutions.

Total Enrollment of International Students at Colleges in U.S.

Year

Total Foreign Enrollment

1-Year % Increase

Intl. Share of Total Enrollments in U.S.

2000-1

547,867

+6.4%

3.9%

2001-2

582,996

+6.4%

4.3%

2002-3

586,323

+0.6%

4.6%

2003-4

572,509

-2.4%

4.3%

2004-5

565,039

-1.3%

4.0%

2005-6

564,766

-0.1%

3.9%

Students from other countries enroll in a range of programs at college in the United States. Just under half are graduate students, and there is a strong practical orientation in the fields of study of foreign students — whether in undergraduate or graduate programs. Of all foreign students, 17.9 percent are in business and management programs, 15.7 percent in engineering, 8.1 percent in mathematics and computer science, and 8.9 percent in physical and life sciences. The humanities share is 2.9 percent.

For American colleges, there are numerous reasons to value foreign students. There is the altruistic, educational role, of course — in which American students are exposed to people and ideas from all over the world, and non-Americans get to learn about American culture and values firsthand, while getting an education better than they might find at home. But there are also very practical reasons American college administrators need to worry about these figures. Many a science or engineering lab could not function these days on American talent alone.

And foreign students bring dollars to American higher education: According to the data being released today, the primary source of funds for 63.4 percent of foreign students is themselves and their families. American colleges are the top source of support for only 25.9 percent of the students.

A variety of factors — real and imagined — can have an impact on enrollment patterns from various countries. Blumenthal said that visa policies and the recruitment efforts of colleges obviously play a huge role. But she also said that the rumor mill was important. When word on the street is that visas are hard to come by, students stop applying. To counter this, she praised an effort by many U.S. embassies to post on their Web sites the average wait times on new visas. (See an example from the Web site of the embassy in China.)

Such factors are particularly important, she said, as other countries step up efforts to recruit foreign talent and an effort to “harmonize” European higher education under three-year undergraduate degrees may make students from Europe (and other places with three-year degrees) more likely to seek graduate education in countries that automatically recognize the three-year degrees. “Institutions [in the United States] are going to have to look at the entire record, and not just whether a degree was three years or four,” she said.

While students from all over the world come to the United States, three countries — India, China, and South Korea — account for more than one third of the total.

Top 10 Countries of Origin for Foreign Students in U.S., 2005-6

Rank and Country

Total

1-Year % Change

Share of International Enrollments

1. India

76,503

-4.9%

13.5%

2. China

62,582

+0.1%

11.1%

3. South Korea

58,847

+10.3%

10.4%

4. Japan

38,712

-8.3%

6.9%

5. Canada

28,202

+0.2%

5.0%

6. Taiwan

27,876

+7.6%

4.9%

7. Mexico

13,931

+6.6%

2.5%

8. Turkey

11,622

-6.8%

2.1%

9. Germany

8,829

+2.2%

1.6%

10. Thailand

8,765

+1.5%

1.6%

The University of Southern California maintained its position as the top destination for international students. Research universities generally top the list, given the high proportion of such students enrolled in graduate and professional programs. A location near the Pacific also helps, especially given the large numbers coming from Asia. In addition to Southern California, the top five master’s institutions are in California as are two of the top five community colleges. Among bachelor’s institutions, two are in Hawaii.

Top Destinations for International Students in the U.S., 2005-6

Rank and Institution

Foreign Enrollment

Research universities

 

1. U. of Southern California

6,881

2. Columbia U.

5,575

3. Purdue U., main campus

5,540

4. New York U.

5,502

5. U. of Texas at Austin

5,395

Master’s institutions

 

1. San Francisco State U.

2,016

2. California State U. at Northridge

1,693

3. California State U. at Long Beach

1,670

4. California State U. at Fullerton

1,593

5. San Jose State U.

1,565

Bachelor’s institutions

 

1. Brigham Young U. — Hawaii campus

1,141

2. SUNY Fashion Institute of Technology

1,018

3. Utah Valley State College

454

4. U. of Hawaii at Hilo

418

5. U. of Dallas

372

Community colleges

 

1. Houston Community College

3,227

2. Santa Monica College

2,658

3. Montgomery College (Md.)

2,179

4. De Anza College (Cal.)

2,112

5. CUNY Borough of Manhattan CC

1,679

Beyond examining the trends for international students in the United States, “Open Doors” also looks at American students who go abroad — although that is typically for a semester or year, not an entire degree program.

Experts on international education have generally had three goals for American students: getting more of them to abroad, getting them to look beyond Western Europe, and getting a broader cross-section of students to consider study abroad. This year’s data suggest progress on the first two goals.

Not only are the total numbers up, but there are good percentage increases for some non-European countries, and Britain, while still the top destination, is down slightly.

Top Destinations for Americans Studying Abroad, 2004-5

Rank and Country

American Enrollments

1-Year % Change

% of Americans Studying Abroad

1. Britain

32,071

-0.5%

15.6%

2. Italy

24,858

+13.4%

12.1%

3. Spain

20,806

+3.6%

10.1%

4. France

15,374

+12.1%

7.5%

5. Australia

10,813

-5.3%

5.2%

6. Mexico

9,244

-0.5%

4.5%

7. Germany

6,557

+9.6%

3.2%

8. China

6,389

+34.9%

3.1%

9. Ireland

5,083

-2.2%

2.5%

10. Costa Rica

4,887

+8.4%

2.4%

11. Japan

4,100

+10.6%

2.0%

12. Austria

2,757

+12.8%

1.3%

13. New Zealand

2,657

+12.2%

1.3%

14. Czech Republic

2,494

+19.4%

1.2%

15. Greece

2,445

+16.5%

1.2%

16. Chile

2,393

+12.1%

1.2%

17. South Africa

2,304

+14.7%

1.1%

18. Argentina

2,013

+53.1%

1.0%

19. Brazil

1,994

+28.3%

1.0%

20. India

1,767

+52.7%

0.9%

Blumenthal of the Institute of International Education said that she was encouraged by the large percentage increases to countries such as India, China and Argentina. “The large numbers are still going to the traditional sites, but the growth [in other places] says to me that people are seeing a professional advantage to having spent time in India or China,” she said.

Colleges should continue to look for ways to encourage such choices, she said. But it’s no failure any time an American student goes abroad — even to an English-speaking nation with many similarities to the United States. “I think anytime you can get anyone out of the United States and out of their own culture, it’s an important and powerful learning experience,” she said.

One disappointment to Blumenthal is the demographics of the American study abroad contingent. Just over 65 percent of participants are female, and 83 percent are white — proportions that have been relatively steady for a decade.

“Female students appear more willing to take time off,” she said.

Part of the reason, historically, has been that many science and engineering programs were lopsided with male enrollments, and these programs have historically sent few students abroad. For that reason, she said she was pleased by the new push at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology to encourage more of its undergraduates to study abroad.

At the same time, she said that gender appeared to be an issue beyond disciplinary choice. Of engineering students who currently study abroad, far more are women than men, Blumenthal said.

The institute has been working with faculty members at historically black colleges, taking some of them on foreign trips to promote the idea that they should recruit their students for foreign programs.

“We need to do a better job of making students of color and their parents realize what’s possible,” she said.

With more of a national emphasis on international education, many colleges seek bragging rights about the percentage of their students who go abroad. IIE does a calculation and ranking — although the system (based on study abroad figures for a year and the number of graduates) results in some colleges with rankings indicating that more than 100 percent of undergraduates study abroad. But with the caveat that the comparisons are imperfect, here are the rankings.

College With Greatest Share of Undergraduates Abroad, 2004-5

Rank and Institution

Undergraduates Abroad

% of Undergraduates Who Study Abroad

Research universities

   

1. Yeshiva U.

637

76.7%

2. U. of Denver

640

68.7%

3. U. of St. Thomas (Minn.)

714

66.4%

4. Wake Forest U.

599

59.9%

5. Georgetown U.

981

58.7%

Master’s institutions

   

1. Elon U.

915

102.9%

2. Hamline U.

325

79.5%

3. U. of Evansville

306

67.7%

4. Warren Wilson College

101

65.6%

5. Arcadia U.

196

64.5%

Bachelor’s institutions

   

1. Austin College

341

110.0%

2. Kalamazoo College

283

99.3%

3. Centre College

252

97.7%

4. Wofford College

240

97.2%

5. Colby College

456

93.8%

Scott Jaschik

Got something to say?


Want it on paper? Print this page.
Know someone who’d be interested? Forward this story.
Want to stay informed? Sign up for free daily news e-mail.

Advertisement

Comments

Not necessarily a good thing...

One must always be cautious when evaluating a report like “Open Doors” since it is clearly designed to promote a political viewpoint. In their view, not being able to bring in foreign students constitutes a “crisis” and argue unqestioningly for foreign enrollment’s benefits.What they do not consider, however, are the downside of foreign enrollment — namely the fact that foreign students often displace Americans from American graduate programs.

While “Open Doors” loves to tout the supposed economic benefits of foreign enrollments, they do not consider the economic costs to Americans who seek graduate education. If an American is denied admission to a graduate program, that is a cost to America’s economy since that individual is unable to further pursue education. If an American has to move out-of-state to attend a graduate program because they are not admitted to their in-state universities, that too creates an addition cost — the student often has to pay out-of-state tuition, and incurs costs of moving, plus intangible costs such as being away from family, etc.

I’m always wary of reports like this which make a blanket assumption that increasing foreign enrollment is good for America. Sometimes it may be, but only if it does not displace an American seeking to further their education.

What I would like to see is state legislatures requiring their tax-payer funded institutions to adopt “Americans First” admission policies, in which foreign applicants are admitting to universities only after all qualified American applicants have been accepted.American universities are, after all, American resources and as such their responsibility is to educate Americans first and foremost.

jrob, at 11:20 pm EST on November 13, 2006

The politics of international student enrollments

I’d have to concur with “jrob” here. The US over the last decade or so has been awfully aggressive about pursuing international student enrollments, at least from certain nations (India, China, South Korea) in a select number of fields (engineering, sciences, and business). At the same time as these numbers have increased to unprecedented levels, American business, government, and educational interests have bemoaned declines in American national participation in all of these disciplines except business. These same entities can only profit from voicing this criticism. American business gets cheaper labor that can set up offshore outsourcing “complementary” businesses, while getting brownie points for propping up and/or criticizing American education. The American government can pursue demographic agendas that relate more to influence-buying than the good of the people of the nation. The American education industry learned 49 years ago (the Sputnik era) that pushing the panic button on education freed up and attracted funding. The only groups that really suffer in this broad-brush criticism are American students and workers -dismissed under blanket banners of incompetence, ignorance and ineptitude without regard for individual merits and accomplishments.

Having studied in a heavily India- and China-dominated engineering graduate program for several years, I can attest that large international student enrollments can affect institutional racial politics and educational standards negatively. The degradation of practices and standards leading to Ohio University’s plagiarism scandal is being carried out in other graduate programs in engineering and probably business as well. Personally seeing the frequency of plagiarism and cheating was shocking enough. A sample of international student papers examined for plagiarism revealed that ALL papers in the sample drew material verbatim from other sources — and that the rate of recidivism in the subsequent papers was 100%. The realization that neither the department nor the institution were willing to enforce academic honesty with respect to international students was mind-blowing — and disturbingly Orwellian — it was made extremely clear that some students were simply more equal than others.

Based on what I’ve seen, I’d submit that two reasons American students stay out of these disciplines is the breakdown in ethical practices and the patently obvious racial discrimination that occurs in these programs.

If America really wishes to maintain its economic and technological competitiveness, it will have to cease engaging in uncritical and shortsighted multicultural agendas. Higher learning institutions will have to start enforcing educational practices and regulations across the board that reward real work and real merit.

Scrawed, at 6:25 am EST on December 22, 2006

Advertisement

 Jobs Related to International Recovery

or search for jobs directly.

Grant Contract Ofcr I
Cornell University

Located in Ithaca, N.Y., Cornell University is a bold, innovative, and inclusive teaching and research university of ... see job

Assistant Professor-Early Childhood, Elementary, & Middle School,
Eastern Illinois University

Eastern Illinois University has a 113 year legacy as an intellectual focal point in central Illinois. Its acclaimed programs ... see job

Assistant Professor, French
College of the Bahamas

DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES Applicants should be prepared to teach all levels of French language and French/Francophone ... see job

Program Representative I
University of California, Los Angeles

Program Representative I
see job

Chair and Head of Mechanical Engineering
Mississippi State University

The Bagley College of Engineering at Mississippi State University is seeking candidates for the Head of the Department of ... see job

Senior Associate Director of Financial Aid
Columbia University

Reporting to the Director of Financial Aid, the Senior Associate Director of Financial Aid is a member of the Office of ... see job

Professor, Pediatrics
University of California, Irvine

School of Medicine Department of Pediatrics and Institute for Clinical and Translational Science Biomedical Informatics — ... see job

Senior Support Technician
Weill Medical College of Cornell University

Founded in 1898, and affiliated with what is now New York-Presbyterian Hospital since 1927, Weill Cornell Medical College ... see job

Assistant/Associate Professor and Coordinator of IT
Millikin University

Millikin University is a vibrant, comprehensive institution with 2400 students, four colleges or schools; Arts and Science, ... see job

Assistant Professor of Comparative Politics/Middle East
Connecticut College

Connecticut College is a highly selective, private, coeducational liberal arts college located in southern New England ... see job