News, Views and Careers for All of Higher Education
Sept. 18, 2006
Legislators reviewing the University of Texas system’s admission policies are considering a multi-year moratorium on a current law that guarantees entrance for in-state students who finish in the top 10 percent of their high school class.
State Sen. Royce West floated the moratorium idea last week to the Senate subcommittee on higher education. West, an advocate of the “top 10 percent law,” said he would consider a temporary reprieve in order to tell which colleges are acting in good faith to enroll a diverse student body. He has previously blocked consideration of major changes in the law. Texas was the first state to adopt such a program, intended to give students at traditionally underperforming high schools a better chance to get into the system, and to ensure a racially and ethnically diverse student body. A policy change — even a temporary one — could prompt other states to take a closer look at their prorgrams.
Texas’s policy was adopted in 1997 as a result of a U.S. Court of Appeals decision that made affirmative action illegal in Texas college admissions (a ruling that was overtaken by the U.S. Supreme Court). Admissions officers were allowed to consinder race and ethnicity once again for the class that began in fall 2005. William Powers, president of the University of Texas at Austin and one of the law’s biggest critics, said that the program hurts the university’s ability to recruit students who are talented but not at the top of their classes. While the law applies to all universities in the system, it particularly affects UT-Austin because of its size and prestige.
“The law was passed at a time after Hopwood [the appeals court ruling on the use of race in admissions], when we had very few tools to diversify the campus,” Powers said. “The top 10 percent rule had a positive effect in that regard. In the late 1990’s, we had about 45 percent of our incoming Texas high school students coming because of the rule, but now that percentage (71 percent) is too high. We don’t have the capacity to take all of them.”
West said as the state’s population continues to grow, UT-Austin and other campuses are going to need to increase their enrollments, and that that 71 percent of students coming in because of the law is “not that big of a number.” He pointed out that the percentage is smaller for all students who are admitted into the system.
“I’m still behind the program 100 percent because kids in the state know what they have to do to get into our colleges. We have predictability,” West said. “It’s our responsibility to educate our own students first.”
Data on freshmen starting their first year in the system from fall 1996 to fall 2005 show that an increasing number of in-state students — from 41 percent to 66 percent — are admitted to UT through the top 10 percent law. And from fall 2001 to fall 2003, university data reveal that some of Texas’s minority students saw an increase in their share of the overall applicant pool. Hispanic students made up 17 percent of the applicants in 2001, compared with 20 percent in 2003. Black and Native American students remained virtually level, and the numbers droped slightly for Asian Americans.
The president said while the top 10 percent law has played a role in the diversification of the system, other outreach programs that target traditionally underperforming high schools have played a role. Powers, testifying before the state’s higher education subcommittee, explained that he isn’t looking to repeal the top 10 percent law. He said he would like to see changes made so that the percentage of in-state students admitted through the program drops to the 40 to 50 percent range. Powers said a moratorium isn’t the best way to go about a change.
“We need to have consistency,” he said. “It’s important for students to have a target they can count on.”
West said the subcommitee is scheduled to issue a report with its recommendations later this year.
Want it on paper? Print this page.
Know someone who’d be interested? Forward this story.
Want to stay informed? Sign up for free daily news e-mail.
Advertisement
President Powers, like his distinguished predecessor, is justified in calling for a cap on top 10 percent. It’s simply ridiculous to select 70 percent of a freshman class based on one criterion — especially one as relative as class ranking. The law served its purpose during the Hopwood years, and for that reason, it makes sense to cap it, rather than kill it. The most attractive option pitched so far is to implement a floating cap. Fifty percent (or whatever number) of spots would be reserved for automatically admitted students each year, and the class ranking cutoff would fluctuate. It might be top 7 percent one year and top 8 the next. This would alleviate much of the pressure on UT admissions without leaving soon-to-be high school graduates feeling slighted. It’s encouraging to hear Senator West entertain the possibility of a repeal. While it’s probably better to phase the law out by first implementing a cap, a full repeal would be better than the present situation.
Clint Johnson, student at University of Texas, at 8:10 pm EDT on September 18, 2006
The 10% rule has out lived its entire reason for existing. The legislature encated that rule in order to counter balance possible enrollment changes due to the Hopwood case. Therefore, if the case is no longer controlling in the jurisdiction then use the admission policy that existed prior to Hopwood. You cannot maintain a flagship university with such a restrictive admission standard.
Philip House, University of Texas as Austin Alumni, at 6:10 pm EST on February 8, 2007
Advertisement
or search for jobs directly.
Westwood College is looking for a Criminal Justice Program Director see job
Everest Institute is a world-class educational organization and a rapidly growing part of Corinthian Colleges, Inc. At ... see job
IT Support Associate II (SAS Programmer I) see job
The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill seeks an experienced, collaborative, and enthusiastic individual to manage ... see job
The Corporate Director of Regulatory Compliance is responsible for ensuring the Company and its campuses’ comply with state ... see job
Job Description: Teaching position available in Physics.
Duties of Position: ... see job
PART-TIME TEMPORARY FACULTY FOR EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP COURSES Central Michigan University seeks qualified part-time ... see job
The American Studies Program and the Department of English at Wesleyan University invite applications for a joint, ... see job
The Department of Art and Design in the Faculty of Arts at the University of Alberta invites applications for a tenure track ... see job
The University of Minnesota is a premier employer and a talent magnet attracting leading faculty and staff from around the ... see job
Level Playing Field Indeed
Despite the flagship’s legitimate concerns with bringing in out of state students, the top ten percent rule has been a rousing success at economically diversifying the student body in Texas. Many students across the state work hard to get into the top ten percent expressly to get into schools that they could never otherwise aspire to admissions at. This rule has been particularly effective at helping to ameliorate the worst consequences of the Texas’ legislature’s abandonment of its responsibilities to higher education. Tuitions here, particularly at the flagship, make higher education an increasingly unattainable dream, especially for economically disadvantaged students. This is not the time to go back to the old policies that had the effect of concealing economic inequities beneath a pastiche of alledged racial and ethnic incentives.
William Harris, Professor at University of Texas at Brownsville, at 7:40 am EDT on September 18, 2006