Advertisement

Advertisement

News, Views and Careers for All of Higher Education

Hunter Settles Suicide Suit

On Wednesday, lawyers representing a former honors student at Hunter College of the City University of New York announced that the institution has settled a lawsuit, which centered on its treatment of students with mental health issues.

Related stories

The case, which was filed in federal court on behalf of a woman who was not identified, resulted in a $65,000 settlement for her. In a letter accompanying the settlement, lawyers for the institution indicated that the college’s “suicide policy” is “under review,” and may be changed to be less punitive toward students who attempt suicide.

Currently, the policy indicates that a student who tries to take his or her life is automatically barred from living in the institution’s dorms, and must leave campus for one full semester after the semester in which he or she is banned. “[S]tudents with psychological issues may be mandated by the Office of Residence Life to receive counseling,” according to the policy.

Richard Kadison, director of mental health services at Harvard University, said Wednesday that such policies are uncommon and “risky” because they don’t allow for individual circumstances that may make such stipulations unreasonable and potentially harmful to students.

Rita Rodin, a spokeswoman for the CUNY system, confirmed the settlement, but said that she could not offer any comment regarding Hunter College’s review of its suicide policy.

The settlement comes amid lots of discussion about college policies involving suicidal students. On Monday, court hearings began in a lawsuit began against Allegheny College by the parents of a student who hanged himself in 2005; they contend that his counselor had a responsibility to prevent their son’s suicide. Also ongoing is a suit headed toward trial against George Washington University, in which a student is seeking both damages and reform of the university’s policy of expelling students who express suicidal thoughts.

In June 2004, the student in the Hunter College case — whose name has not been released by her lawyers, to protect her privacy — found herself adversely affected by the policy, according to court records. After taking a large number of Tylenol pills and making an emergency trip to a hospital, she returned home to find that the locks on her doors had been changed.

Immediately, according to her lawyers, she asked that college administrators let her remain in the dorms, as doctors had determined that she was not a danger to herself or others. Her request was denied. Ultimately, she was allowed to pack up her belongings only under surveillance of a security guard, which humiliated her, according to court documents. She also became worried once again about her mental state.

“It was very difficult for her,” said David Goldfarb, one of her lawyers. “She felt that everyone knew her business and was very uncomfortable.”

After she sued the college — charging violation of the Fair Housing Act, the Americans with Disabilities Act and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act — Goldfarb said that the student began feeling overwhelmed, and left college.

Until the settlement, Hunter College had defended its policy in court, but with the letter accompanying the settlement, which promises a review, that course appears to be reversed.

“Individualized responses to a student’s situation are crucial to prevent the kind of arbitrary exclusion that [the student] faced,” said Karen Bower, another lawyer for the student, who works for the Bazelon Center for Mental Health. “Schools that exclude students who seek help discourage them from getting the help they need, isolate the students from friends and support at a time when support is most needed, and send students the message that they have done something wrong.”

The student could not be reached for comment on Wednesday, but Goldfarb said that she views the settlement as a victory, and may return to Hunter, where she would be eligible to complete three courses left incomplete after she exited the institution.

She will receive the payment in monthly increments over four years, at her request.

Rob Capriccioso

Got something to say?


Want it on paper? Print this page.
Know someone who’d be interested? Forward this story.
Want to stay informed? Sign up for free daily news e-mail.

Advertisement

Comments

Brick Wall

What can you say? If the student commits suicide, the school gets sued because somehow they should have been able to prevent it. So, in a re-active effort not to get sued, schools decide they will just reduce their liability by expelling the student or simply not allowing them to reside in the school dorms. Sued again.

Let’s brainstorm here? What is the school’s reasonable responsibility when a student expresses deep sadness and hopelessness? Remember, they are not allowed to tell the parents.

S.D., at 9:45 am EDT on August 24, 2006

chickens coming home to roost

SD, Schools and people get sued because: 1) the law is not clear; and/or 2) they have an obligation to pay and they will not. Schools are getting into trouble because rather than treat their students like hotel guests, they treat them like children – until they decide to evict them. Then they treat them like trespassers.

If a student expresses a deep sadness here, as a legal matter, is the school’s responsibility: nothing. Just like Marriot has no obligation to make sure its guests are bubbly cheerleaders. If, on the other hand, they start to treat them, then they have to follow through.

Unfortunately, some administrators have decided that they can increase their own power by evicting and expelling students “for their own good” without even considering that no real harm has been done to anyone. (For this reason, I have told a few students to never tell anyone that they are depressed, and to always keep their sadness a secret. Most supposedly “confidential” counseling at schools is not confidential, anyway, and “counselors” either don’t understand the law or just make it up as they go along. A student will harm their future career prospects by blabbing about how they feel to anyone but a bartender or girlfriend.)

Finally, if you are going to state “we are not allowed to tell parents” please cite a statute, rather than render a conclusory statement. Thanks.

Larry, at 10:20 am EDT on August 24, 2006

FERPA explicitly states that we CAN tell parents of dependent students ANYTHING without risk of lawsuit. Nos, I don’t like to speak to parents without the involvement of a student, but if a students life or well-being is at risk, I do what I have to do to protect that student.

Not only that, but it is our responsibility to tell parents when the stakes are that high. Anyone who withholds information from parents about a suicidal student is committing professional suicide. Let’s not be so freaked out by FERPA that we forget to act in our students’ best interest.

Beth, Dean of Students, at 12:20 pm EDT on August 24, 2006

Questions for Larry

Larry states, “For this reason, I have told a few students to never tell anyone that they are depressed, and to always keep their sadness a secret.”

Question Set 1: Are you trained at diagnosing depression and distinguishing it from ordinary sadness? Can you recognize the signs that a student is serious about harming themselves — or others? Do you refer them to a competent physician?

Larry also asserts, “Most supposedly “confidential” counseling at schools is not confidential, anyway, and “counselors” either don’t understand the law or just make it up as they go along.”

Question Set 2: Do you know this to be the case at your institution (as opposed to just “rendering a conclusory statement)? If you do know this to be the case, have you taken concrete steps to correct the situation?

Larry grandly concludes, “A student will harm their future career prospects by blabbing about how they feel to anyone but a bartender or girlfriend.”

Question Set 3: Do you know for a fact that employers access the counseling records at your institution? Do you feel that the possible damage to “future career prospects” is worse than the possible damage to a student’s mental or physical health?

If the answers to any or all of the above questions is “no,” then only one question remains:

ARE YOU INSANE?!?

MediaDoc, Associate Professor at East Carolina Univ., at 12:21 pm EDT on August 24, 2006

MediaDoc’s loaded questions

Beth, You said that “FERPA explicitly states that we CAN tell parents of dependent students ANYTHING without risk of lawsuit.” What section says that. (Please provide specifics regarding the section and its text.)

MediaDoc, No, I am not trained to diagnose any mental illness. In fact, I don’t believe in them. (Though for various reasons not relevant here, I am ethically bound to assume that they exist.) Whether or not I can recognize what you consider “signs” of mental illnesses is irrelevant. Instead, if people ask me a question such as “what should I do?” I give tell them the truth: talking about mental illness will hurt your career.

I don’t work for an institution, but institutions are my clients. Without going into details, there are ongoing issues regarding counseling confidentiality. There are wide differences between various institutions on what policy they want to take with regard to confidentiality.

Finally, Media, when one applies for most jobs that require security clearances or for membership in the bar, a having mental problems will raise red flags. See Question 21 on SF-86, if you doubt me. www.opm.gov/forms/pdf_fill/SF86.pdf

While I realize that there are protections for people with mental problems, I would certainly not want someone seeing a shrink operating on me, or representing me on court when my freedom was at stake. Nor does the government.

Finally, you asked whether I was insane or not. You implied that I was not capable of diagnosing myself. I think I am quite sane. I just wouldn’t go to a shrink.

Larry, at 12:50 pm EDT on August 24, 2006

No harm done?

Larry your statement that, “Unfortunately, some administrators have decided that they can increase their own power by evicting and expelling students “for their own good” without even considering that no real harm has been done to anyone. (For this reason, I have told a few students to never tell anyone that they are depressed, and to always keep their sadness a secret.” is extremely contradictory to my own experience. In my experience, suicide attempts have a tremendous ripple effect on fellow students, staff, and any others who are involved. Most campuses have polices prohibiting violence including when an individual perpetuates that violence upon themselves.

The subsequent statement, “Finally, if you are going to state “we are not allowed to tell parents” please cite a statute, rather than render a conclusory statement.” Seems to me to indicate that Larry may have understanding of FERPA and students right to privacy.

Regardless, I too am distressed at the “damned if you do and damned if you don’t” mentaility that seems to govern the world of litigation where the finger is always pointing everywhere but at oneself. With that said, I would add a third point to Larry’s reasons schools and people get sued: 3) Individuals refuse or unable to take responsibility for their own actions and use the legal system to exonerate themselves for poor choices and/or participate in the new “legal lottery” system and try to get a payday via a lawsuit.

Michael, at 12:55 pm EDT on August 24, 2006

Hunter College

Hunter is at vault for caving into the blackmail of the student and her nefarious lawyers. It is not a victory for the student. Quite the opposite. It forces institutions to waste money. Mental health is a personal matter, and if the individual is suffering, then the individual should turn to his/her parents, friends, religious organizations or other organizations for that purposes—not to the school.

To say that Hunter College owes the woman redress is to say that the state or a hospital owes it to a person who had an accident when refusing to wear a helmet medical attention. People must be responsible for their own actions.

Arthur Ide, at 1:05 pm EDT on August 24, 2006

FERPA

Larry, the section Beth is referring to is 20 USC 1232g(b)(1)(H). That sections specifically carves out an exception allowing the release of educational records to parents of depedent children.

JM, at 3:55 pm EDT on August 24, 2006

response to JM, Beth, and Mr. Idle

JM, That section does not provide an immunity from suit. Instead, it simply provides an exception to the FERPA’s non-disclosure provisions, which can’t be privately enforced, anyway. I think Beth got inaccurate information.

Arthur Idle, I appreciate the research that you have put into this issue. However, whether or not someone is “responsible” for their own injuries is a matter of substantive law, which is determined, in this case, by the legislature and the courts. Insofar as factual questions are at issue, those are usually left to juries. For the most part, outsiders to a case have no way of knowing the facts, because they are usually just too complex to be reported by the press. While I admit that I used to work for a firm that would troll the non-lawyers by claiming that all plaintiffs were out for case (including ones who were entitled to it, and ones we settled with), I think it is an unfortunate tactic of lawyers to reduce legal issues to such slogans, because non-lawyers will pretty much repeat what they are told in a press release.

Larry, at 4:25 pm EDT on August 24, 2006

Law was clear

Larry wrote, “Schools and people get sued because: 1) the law is not clear ....” However, here the law was clear. The eviction disciminated against a person with a disability and therefore Hunter College violated the Fair Housing Act, The ADA, and the Rehabilitation Act. [I am one of the attorneys for the student in this case].

David Goldfarb, Goldfarb Abrandt Salzman & Kutzin LLP, at 5:05 am EDT on September 3, 2006

Victory Indeed!

The college obviously did not have a policy regarding suicide that was in line with the legal rights of individuals. As a public institution of such magnitude, its unthinkable that CUNY could be caught in such a situation; especially with an honors pupil. Surely, creating a policy that is in line with federally protect rights would cost far less than the settlement. I am quite pleased at the outcome and would encourage those in higher education to consider the well being of their students in such a matter, something I think the college failed to do properly. It’s the right human thing to do, wouldn’t you say?

K Stephen, Mr, at 4:45 pm EDT on September 9, 2006

People who attempt suicide or commit suicide shouldn’t be discrimnated against. Having suicidal thoughts is a side effect of a mental illness. Just like any another illness people don’t choose to have a mental disease.If someone has suicidal thoughts and express them, they should be helped. No matter who it is.There needs to be support. Suicidal people don’t want to die they want to stop the pain. It’s a cry for help. That’s all they want. Instead of caring about the “reputation of the college” they should care about saving a human life.

Candace, at 8:10 pm EDT on October 22, 2006

Advertisement

 Jobs Related to Hunter Settles Suicide Suit

or search for jobs directly.

Dean for Nursing
International University of Nursing

Become intrinsically involved in the growth of this fast rising international nursing school see job

Nursing Faculty Position (Adult or Gerontology Focus Preferred)
James Madison University

Join one of the finest regional universities in the nation. James Madison University, home to 18,000 + students, welcomes you ... see job

Lecturer in Physical Chemistry
University of Wollongong

Faculty/Dept: Faculty of Science Unit: School of Chemistry Reference No: 23148 Closing Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2008 Position Type: ... see job

Journalism and Mass Communication Faculty
American University in Cairo

Journalism and Mass Communication (JMC-3-09) About The American University in Cairo: Founded in 1919, AUC’s campus is ... see job

Associate Professor
University of South Carolina

A leader in academe, the University of South Carolina holds the Carnegie Foundation’s highest research designation and is ... see job

101543 — Instructor: General Biology — FT
Greenville Technical College

Come join our Biological Sciences Department! see job

Associate or Assistant Professor, French
University of Alberta

The Department of Modern Languages and Cultural Studies (MLCS) in the Faculty of Arts at the University of Alberta invites ... see job

Admissions Representative
Corinthian Colleges

Everest College, a respected member of the Corinthian Colleges’ network of schools, is dedicated to helping students ... see job

Winter Intensive Language Program Instructors
Monterey Institute of International Studies

MONTEREY INSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES JOB OPPORTUNITIES INSTRUCTOR –WINTER INTENSIVE LANGUAGE PROGRAM 2009 ... see job

Assistant Director of Human Resources
Cheyney University of Pennsylvania

Situated on rolling hillsides in southern Pennsylvania, Cheyney University, established in 1837, the oldest institution of ... see job