News, Views and Careers for All of Higher Education
Aug. 15, 2006
Some professors and students at Utah Valley State College are a bit confused after the institution’s Board of Trustees asked last week that conservative political ideologies be taken into account regarding a planned course requirement for 2008-9.
Academic committees have worked for nearly five years to develop language for a new “global/intercultural” general education requirement for students, which was motivated in part by December 1999 recommendations from the Utah State Board of Regents’s Task Force on General Education. The report said that an educated person should “appreciate diversity” and possess the abilities “to integrate ethical, cultural, and historical considerations in the humanities” and “to relate another’s humanity to one’s own.”
In constructing the new requirement, which would call for students to take one course in any number of departments, committee members interviewed multiple faculty members, students and others from colleges in the state. They ultimately decided that courses satisfying the requirement must study cultural differences; advocate critical assessments of such differences and their meaning; and pay particular attention to groups within global, local, or campus community contexts that “many of our students are unlikely to have examined.”
“We tried to be diplomatic in developing it,” Bill Evenson, chair of the college’s General Education Committee, explained Monday. He also noted that most other Utah colleges and universities have general education requirements that reflect the same tenets.
On Thursday, however, some unexpected concerns were raised by more than one member of the institution’s board at its summer meeting. The Associated Press reports that trustees were worried about “sensitive issues” that could offend the “conservative community.” Members of the board did not return calls for elaboration on Monday.
While President Bill Sederburg told the trustees that he’s happy to have the course requirements sent back and modified, others are not so sanguine.
Evenson, for one, doesn’t know what more needs to be done. “I’m not entirely sure how they want us to tighten up the phrases,” he said. “I’m going to contact them and ask for suggestions before the next board meeting in October.” He had expected a proposal supporting the requirement to pass at the board meeting on Thursday.
He added, though, that the conservative talk wasn’t entirely unexpected. “Our committee was aware that some people think we should reflect the values of our conservative community,” he said. “But we have always advocated an atmosphere of academic freedom.”
Joseph Vogel, a recent graduate of Utah Valley State College, has seen tensions flare on campus regarding political ideology in the past. He was the student body vice president in 2004 when he invited filmmaker Michael Moore to speak on campus, sparking an uproar among local politicians and citizens. He’s written a new book about the controversy, “Free Speech 101: The Utah Valley Uproar Over Michael Moore,” which is scheduled for national release in October.
The author said Monday that the climate on campus hasn’t changed much over the last two years. “I feel that certain conservative people are trying to control the curriculum,” he said. “But I’m surprised that this kind of class would raise eyebrows.”
At the same time, Vogel said he believes that many professors at the college are liberal. “But on the whole, it’s pretty balanced,” he added. “Students should be able to sort of the information presented to them and come to their own conclusions.”
Peter Walters, a senior majoring in analytic communications and social science, believes that the requirement is needed at the institution. He works at the international office at Utah Valley State where he assists international students with their questions and American students with study abroad.
“I’ve spent three years of my life living as a minority on other continents — Africa and Asia — where I have learned much,” said Walters. “Seeing the way people of other cultures approach problems in daily life is like mental floss; it loosens up my calcified perspectives.”
Walters was saddened when he learned that the trustees have not yet approved the requirement. “It makes sense to me to have it,” he said, “and I don’t see how the community could possibly be offended by it.”
Want it on paper? Print this page.
Know someone who’d be interested? Forward this story.
Want to stay informed? Sign up for free daily news e-mail.
Advertisement
Is this the best that academics can do: calling each other “liberal” or “conservative” and lowering themselves to the level of political discourse in the country? Most of the political-types go away when they are asked to do lots of reading before commenting. Asking for critical comment on the entire curriculum usually drives most people away before they can start claiming “bias.” Using buzzwords like “diversity” or “culture” usually brings the political-types in like flies on ****.
In a phrase: A Diophantine equation a day keeps Bill O’Reilly away.
Larry, at 10:05 am EDT on August 15, 2006
Since when do we allow course work to be dicatated by politics. While I am a conservative I have grewat didain for those that would seek to have an agenda as parrt of the curriculm of another Professor’s work.
I am ashamed of UVSC. The powers that be should know better.
Allan Silberstein, MAED
Allan Silberstein, Facilitatro at Nazarene Bible College, at 12:20 pm EDT on August 15, 2006
I’m trying to figure out what about these requirements could be considered problematic. Has “diversity” itself become suspect? Is the concept of multiple perspectives the problem?
I honestly can’t think of a way in which these sorts of guidelines could be problematic for reasonable conservatives unless the courses available to fulfill them are themselves the problem (in which case, revising the requirement probably won’t help).
Jonathan Dresner, at 2:05 pm EDT on August 15, 2006
“Has “diversity” itself become suspect?”
Yes, very much so.
K.T., at 7:55 pm EDT on August 15, 2006
It always amazes me when people are surprised by events like this. Public institutions are inherently political institutions. As long as such institutions receive public subsidies, they are and always will be sites of contest over public policy and community values.
Taxpayers who fund these institutions will legitimately encourage politicians to use their influence to reflect public opinion in that particular state or locality. It is one of the most elemental tenets of political theory.
K.T., at 7:55 pm EDT on August 15, 2006
KT, Let’s go one step further: learning is inherently political. In fact, one cannot study a single subject without making philosophical assumptions.
Larry, at 9:40 pm EDT on August 15, 2006
Bill Evenson, for one, claims that his group has “always advocated an atmosphere of academic freedom.” Joseph Vogel, says that “certain conservative people are trying to control the curriculum.”
But it is they who insist that students must “appreciate diversity’” and “must study cultural differences.”
Multiculturalism—here called diversity— is a political position. As its advocates, Evenson and Vogel are the ones who are trying to control the curriculum and restrict academic freedom.
Brian Gratton, at 2:15 pm EDT on August 16, 2006
“KT, Let’s go one step further: learning is inherently political. In fact, one cannot study a single subject without making philosophical assumptions.”
100% correct... to go one step further, LIFE is political!
K.T., at 4:40 am EDT on August 17, 2006
“Multiculturalism—here called diversity— is a political position.”
In a global economy and a mixed culture, diversity is a fact. Undermining and ignoring diversity and the need to understand other cultures is an endorsement of ignorance, not of a political position.
kgotthardt, at 4:35 am EDT on August 18, 2006
Kgo, This is strange. How can you tell that one view is based on “ignorance” and another view is based on “intelligence” without having some baseline of objective truth and knowledge? I am curious to know how you are privy to such an absolutist view of truth as I have been looking for truth – devoid of politics – for quite some time. Thank you in advance for your views.
Larry, at 10:50 am EDT on August 21, 2006
Advertisement
or search for jobs directly.
The Department of Sociology at Appalachian State University invites applications for a tenure-track nine-month faculty ... see job
Position Summary: University Health Services (UHS), located in the McCosh Health Center, is a fully ... see job
East Carolina University, a constituent institution of the University of North Carolina, is a doctoral institution with an ... see job
Join a vibrant campus community whose excellence is reflected in its diversity and student success. West Chester ... see job
DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES Candidate should have a Ph.D. or Ed.D. in Education Research with a minimum of 3 years of ... see job
The Economics Program of Bard College invites applications for a full-time tenure-line position specializing in financial ... see job
Job Description: Teach Introductory Speech courses (SPE 101) to our undergraduate population.
see job
The University of Minnesota is a premier employer and a talent magnet attracting leading faculty and staff from around the ... see job
The University of Minnesota is a premier employer and a talent magnet attracting leading faculty and staff from around the ... see job
Azusa Pacific University seeks applications for Assistant/Associate Professor of Education. see job
Those members of the Board of Trustees at Utah Valley State College who are insuinuating themselves in a matter that is primarily a faculty concern—developing a general education requirement—should quickly acknowledge the faculty’s reponsibility for setting the curriculum. Trustees have no business imposing ideological guidelines on course material.
roger bowen, at 9:55 am EDT on August 15, 2006