News, Views and Careers for All of Higher Education
Aug. 2, 2006
A respected chair of religious studies at Elizabethtown College, in Pennsylvania, is arrested for allegedly making Internet plans to meet an undercover agent who was posing as a 12-year-old girl. A long-time dean of African-American affairs at the University of Virginia announces his retirement just days after admitting he lied to investigators regarding his “knowledge of the activities of a known drug dealer.” And a director of undergraduate studies at Eastern Oregon University is placed on paid leave after torrid allegations of rape are exposed.
All of the events occurred during the hot, hot month of July, much to the chagrin at administrators at the spotlighted institutions. While it isn’t every day that colleges and universities see top administrators or professors accused of or involved in major crimes, institutions often have to make fast-paced employment decisions that have immediate impact on individuals and reputations.
“There is just such shock that someone you know could have possibly done such a thing,” said Ann Franke, president of Wise Results, a firm that advises colleges on legal risks. Franke, a longtime expert on higher education law and risk management, has helped several administrators deal with real-time crises.
“It can turn your professional and personal life upside down,” she said. “You just have to drop everything to deal with it.”
On Friday — soon after police officials shared details of their Internet sting — Elizabethtown President Theodore E. Long did just that, announcing the dismissal of David B. Eller, who, in addition to chairing the college’s religious studies program, also directed the Young Center, a campus facility focused on promoting the study of Anabaptist and Pietist groups. He’s also an ordained minister in the Church of the Brethren.
After the dismissal, the president said in a statement that Eller could “no longer serve the college with integrity or effectiveness.” The former employee now faces charges of attempted unlawful contact with a minor and criminal use of a computer.
Christopher Simpson, chief executive officer of SimpsonScarborough, a firm that advises colleges on press relations and marketing issues, said that Long’s actions were probably best for the institution’s image and reputation, regardless of whether Eller is found innocent or guilty in court.
Simpson says that historically in higher education, administrators have often tried to sweep such scandals under the proverbial rug. “But that’s changed dramatically in the past five years,” he says. “There is more of an understanding that institutions’ images are fragile.… More top administrators are realizing that they have to be open, accountable and transparent.”
Franke said that many university policies allow for summary dismissal in circumstances like those involving Eller, even before guilt or innocence is proven. She said, too, that many institutions tend to model their rules for faculty dismissal on policies established by the American Association of University Professors, which call for professors to be suspended with pay if they pose a significant threat to the reputation of an institution. Alleged crimes that are considered to be of “severe moral turpitude,” like intended sex with a minor, are usually administrative grounds for dismissal — even at the accusation stage.
“People above them have to consider what impact the allegations will have on the reputation of the institution,” said Raymond D. Cotton, a Washington lawyer who represents boards and presidents in their negotiations over contracts. He said that in many instances administrators will err on the side of caution in order to protect the image of the institution.
But there’s a flip-side to such caution: “Sometimes schools can injure the innocent,” said Cotton. “There are always legal risks if a university overreacts.”
Franke said that it’s much easier to proceed when an individual decides to resign or retire, as was the case with Virginia’s M. Rick Turner, who had served for 18 years as the university’s dean of African-American affairs. The university had placed Turner on paid leave in mid-July after he signed an agreement with a federal prosecutor acknowledging that he misrepresented his knowledge of the activities of a “known drug dealer” in exchange for not being prosecuted. Further details on the case have not been released.
“It simplifies everything,” said Franke, “when an individual realizes that he should separate himself from an institution.”
For those who choose to remain — as is the case with Robert Davis, director of undergraduate studies at Eastern Oregon — paid leave is often used to give administrators more time to consult with lawyers, said Franke. Last week, a professor and a student filed lawsuits charging that Davis raped them after he allegedly drugged them while the three were attending a conference. A lawyer for Davis has said that the charges are untrue.
Franke believes that the extra time can be invaluable. “It’s easy in a moment of crisis and negative publicity to act with your gut instinct,” she said, “which can get you into trouble if your instincts don’t jibe with your institution’s policies.”
Cotton said that for a person in Davis’s position, administrators would probably have the legal leeway to dismiss him. “Most senior administrators below the president do not have written employment agreements,” he says. “They are at-will employees and can be fired for any legitimate reason.”
Simpson believes that in dealing with all scandals, administrators must be increasingly aware that every moment counts when it comes to institutional reputation. “More administrators are having to determine if they want to pull the trigger quickly,” he said, noting that crisis and media training is becoming ever more popular. “It’s a real balancing act.”
Want it on paper? Print this page.
Know someone who’d be interested? Forward this story.
Want to stay informed? Sign up for free daily news e-mail.
Advertisement
Gentle readers, let me clarify one point in Rob’s very good article. Summary dismissal for administrators differs from summary dismissal for tenured faculty.
Summary dismissal for an administrator facing criminal charges may be feasible. One would first check the institution’s policies, any written contract the administrator might have, and state law, which is particularly relevant to public institutions.
Summary dismissal is generally not feasible for tenured faculty or administrators who simultaneously hold tenured appointments. If a tenured professor faces serious criminal charges, a college might use reassignment or suspension with pay to reconcile, at least temporarily, the immediate institutional and individual needs. Again, the devil is in the policy details.
As Rob points out, these situations create tough emotional, legal, and reputational problems.
Ann Franke, President at Wise Results, LLC, at 1:35 pm EDT on August 2, 2006
I welcome seeing the clarification that Ann Franke posted earlier today regarding summary dismissal. Under generally accepted standards of the academic community, the dismissal for cause of a faculty member with tenure or of a nontenured faculty member before the expiration of his or her term of appointment should occur only after the affordance of an adjudicative hearing of record before an elected faculty body in which the administration bears the burden of demonstrating adequacy of cause.
Not covered in her clarification is the issue of suspension, about which I suspect her remarks were not accurately reported. As I am sure Ms. Franke would agree, a “significant threat to the reputation of an institution” is an inappropriate standard for imposing on a faculty member such a severe sanction as a suspension—and much looser than what is called for under AAUP-recommended standards (and followed by a substantial number of colleges and universities): “immediate harm to the faculty member or others is threatened by the faculty member’s continuance.”
Robert Kreiser, Associate Secretary at American Association of University Professors, at 4:10 pm EDT on August 2, 2006
Advertisement
or search for jobs directly.
Posting Description: The School of Education and Human Development (SEHD) at the University of Colorado ... see job
The Hematology/Oncology Division of Mattel Children’s Hospital at UCLA and the Department of Pediatrics of the David Geffen ... see job
Cornell University, located in Ithaca, New York, is an inclusive, dynamic, and innovative Ivy League university and New ... see job
Located just north of Houston, Texas, our five campuses serve 1,400 square miles. Our student enrollment is nearly 50,000 in ... see job
Posting Description: The Department of Pathology at the University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine is ... see job
The University of Rochester’s William E. Simon Graduate School of Business Administration is seeking candidates for tenured ... see job
Governors Sate University seeks applications for a candidate to support its various computer applications, including the ... see job
The University of Minnesota is a premier employer and a talent magnet attracting leading faculty and staff from around the ... see job
See for yourself what makes UK one great place to work. see job
Clinical lab instructors will be needed to assist faculty and students with the learning and practice activities of nursing ... see job
Just a quick distinction which the article seems to blur. There is no crime in merely “knowing” about the activities of an “allege drug dealer.” There is, however, a crime in a) speaking to the cops; and b) misrepresenting your knowledge. Whatever the case, before anyone (student, professor, or administrator) speaks to the cops they should retain a lawyer, who can ascertain what the police really want to know, and the conditions under which your information is being provided. Assurances provided to lay people without a lawyer are generally not binding, and, ironically, it is correct and normal for the police to misrepresent the character of an investigation or questioning to a lay person. This guy could have kept his job, and the university could have avoided scandal if he had consulted with a lawyer.
Larry, at 12:20 pm EDT on August 2, 2006