News, Views and Careers for All of Higher Education
July 25, 2006
By 2011, Florida’s eleven public universities are expected to enroll an additional 65,000 students each year. In a state that guarantees substantial financial awards to those who perform well in high school and on placement exams, finding space for such students is proving to be quite the obstacle.
In addition to looking for more legislative dollars to build physical spaces, Mark Rosenberg, chancellor of the state’s public universities, is looking toward one place with some underutilized space: the calendar — and its summer months. He’s advocating a year-round system for public universities that he estimates could serve 30,000 more students each summer, thus alleviating crowding in the fall, winter and spring months.
Thousands of students already attend summer courses at Florida’s public universities, but Rosenberg argues that core classes could be offered more systematically (translation: fewer courses with the greatest possible number of students enrolled). He also believes that giving students a summer option would allow more to complete their degrees on time and that facilities will be better utilized, since many are already open to students in the summer months.
“Our challenge is to expand summer services in an efficient manner,” says Rosenberg. “The leadership at [our universities] must be willing to consider offering more robust summer offerings.” Currently, it’s largely left to departments and campuses to decide which courses will be offered, employing faculty members who want to teach and earn extra money.
The Florida Board of Governors is scheduled to consider the chancellor’s idea – which has received some support from top university leaders in the state – in August.
College officials who’ve already toiled in this arena say that Rosenberg would be wise to expect challenges on multiple fronts. Faculty members, financial aid experts and even parents have helped quash initiatives at some universities. Meanwhile, Dartmouth College, which has offered a year-round calendar since the 1970s, has faced what its provost calls “stressful” scheduling issues.
A couple of years ago, George Washington University considered making the move to year-round scheduling with its president, Stephen Joel Trachtenberg, arguing its merits before the U.S. Senate. He said that by using college facilities year round, there would be less competition for housing and classes; more income for the university; and lower tuition for students.
The idea was tabled, however, after GW’s Faculty Senate voted unanimously that the institution shouldn’t pursue the route, with concerns about their ability to conduct research being one of their main arguments. While GW offers summer courses, professors are not required to offer them and many opt to focus on research.
Parents and students also told GW administrators that such a schedule would limit students’ ability to travel, work and participate in internships during the summer months.
“Our sense was that other universities weren’t running to do this,” recalls Don Lehman, executive vice president for academic affairs at GW. “The cons just ended up outweighing the benefits.”
Even Dartmouth College, which initiated a year-round system decades ago in part to alleviate campus crowding resulting from going co-educational, has seen its share of challenges. “If you’re going to increase your student body, sooner or later, you’re going to have to add faculty — and space for that faculty,” says Barry Scherr, provost of Dartmouth.
Scherr also says that it can be difficult to ensure that enough students are available to take classes in certain terms. If a large cohort took chemistry in the summer, for instance, there may not be enough students taking the course in a fall or winter term and thus fewer professors would be needed to teach. “It’s a balancing act,” says the provost.
Federal student aid in the context of a year-round calendar system is another issue of concern, since the federal system is based on a yearly calendar. That is, if a student uses up all available Pell Grant or other federal aid in his or her fall and spring terms, there may not be money left over for summer enrollment need. Larry Zaglaniczny, director of Congressional relations for the National Association of Student Financial Aid Administrators, says that federal law must be changed in order to provide “a seamless delivery system of financial aid,” especially for the students with most need.
Terry W. Hartle, senior vice president of government and public affairs at the American Council on Education, thinks that the Florida plan is a “terrific idea” because it could provide more educational opportunities to students. “As enrollment grows exponentially in many states, the need to provide more educational opportunities is paramount,” he says. “This is a logical and appropriate step for states to be thinking about. It’s really time for the higher education world to take a serious look at this.”
Hartle says that professorial concerns can be addressed by ensuring that faculty member leaves are spread out, and that academics don’t feel like their scholarship is being shortchanged. He says that the biggest cost will involve hiring more faculty members.
In terms of financial issues, Rosenberg says his mind is currently focused on the Florida Legislature. If the Florida Board of Governors votes in favor of his plan, his next step will be to ask the legislative body for a yet undisclosed amount of money for a test program at one public university that would offer a true year-round curriculum. The pilot would allow officials to plan the logistics of such a model, as well as determine student interest and impact on faculty members.
“They’re very interested in retention and graduation rates,” Rosenberg says of the legislature. “And I think this will be a very helpful and popular way to achieve those goals.”
Want it on paper? Print this page.
Know someone who’d be interested? Forward this story.
Want to stay informed? Sign up for free daily news e-mail.
Advertisement
The article conflates two ideas: students attending year-round and using summer to accommodate more students during a calendar cycle.
The former definitely creates issues of financial aid. If Pell and other programs are to accommodate year-round attendance, the annual budget for each program will need to increase substantially. And these are not funded at a level adequate to meet current need now.
If the idea is to accommodate a larger cohort each year, but have most students enroll at their current intensity levels, both scheduling and — again — financial aid funding issues create barriers.
Then there is the specter of accommodating both changes.
And nowhere does anyone mention the impact of compressing a standard US baccalaureate into 3 years. Speak to those who participated in true trimester experiments in the baby-boom era. For many, it was not a pleasant experience.
Which is not to say that increasing the efficient use of campus resources is not a desirable strategy. Just that Florida, other states, and the Congress may not have the will to underwrite the cost of transition.
Gadfly at Large, at 8:40 am EDT on July 25, 2006
Lawrence, you write that “Hybrid courses are ... a great way to conduct research and teach at the same time.” Is this based on your personal experience, or an assumption that online courses are somehow easier to teach? Most faculty with online experience would tell you that your assumption is misplaced.
Hoosier Prof, at 10:05 am EDT on July 25, 2006
The main reason to offer extensive summer school (with financial aid), and it’s a great reason, is so that students have the opportunity to finish college sooner. In theory, students who attend over the summer could finish in 3 years. No additional financial aid would be necessary, since 4 years of aid would simply be shoe-horned into 3 years. Summer breaks are nice, but the reality is that it would be financially more valuable for everyone if students could finish in 3 years instead of 4.
A Value Investor, at 11:50 am EDT on July 25, 2006
I think the idea of year-round classes makes sense in some respects. My institution does a bang up job with summer school, which is always expanding as students from other institutions return home and want to take a few classes over the summer. But it’s an option for professors, a way to make extra money.
When I went on the job market, I was offered a tenure-line job at a medical school. It was an eleven-month position, but I couldn’t imagine ever doing my research, which involves fieldwork abroad, if I took that job. Although I teach occasionally in the summers, I would never want to have to do it. It would kill my research agenda.
As for the comment regarding on-line courses as an alternative—I think it is a big mistake to assume on-line (which is basically the new format for correspondence) courses are going to solve space issues at any university. I’m not even convinced they are a good format for any university that is concerned about providing quality educational experiences for students.
The Untenured Observer, Assistant Professor, at 3:25 pm EDT on July 25, 2006
It’s not the modality — online vs. in-class — that’s the issue for either labor or rigor. Online courses are definitely extremely labor-intensive, involving (on top of the actual academic work) a good deal of meticulous record-keeping for each student on a weekly or sometimes daily basis, in addition to ongoing written communication with each student and with the class as a whole. A lively discussion that can be held in an hour with ten people in a classroom could take most of a week online.
As for rigor, online courses can be as rigorous or as minimal as in-class courses; it depends on the course design. At one extreme, a classroom neighbor of mine spend an entire summer session showing videos and regularly letting his class out halfway through the allotted time. On the other hand, I’ve seen online courses that require graduate-level concentration on the material.
Optimally, a hybrid curriculum seems best for nontraditional students who must hold down a job and/or raise a family while they are also studying. It is important not to allow “online” to become synonymous with “relaxed” or “loose” and to maintain high standards of rigor in whatever modality one teaches.
marya, at 6:50 am EDT on July 26, 2006
Since 2000, the state of California has been phasing in state support of summer instruction at the University of California and Cal State University systems, replacing the self-supporting summer terms. UC is now 100 percent funded on a year-round basis by the state. The purpose was to accommodate increased enrollments and to reduce the need for new classroom facilities.
Virtually all UC students are full-time during the “regular academic year", but are taking courses in the summer on a part-time basis. They are not substituting summer enrollment for enrollment in another term, so are therefore enrolling year-round. The result at several campuses has been shorter time to degree (but not three years). Students who enroll in a summer term and therefore don’t return in the fall as “fifth year seniors” make room for additional new students.
Since students are enrolled year-round, there is not a decrease in use of classrooms in the regular academic year. And, since several hundred faculty positions were added as a consequence of the increase in state-funded enrollments, additional office, research and academic support facilities are required to accommodate them.
Campuses continue to offer “irregular” schedules — i.e., three, five, six week sessions, not terms that equal a full quarter or semester.
Operationally, the transition has been complicated, but successful in several respects. The availability of state funding has made it possible to provide financial aid (not usually available when summer was self-supporting). Pell grant funds are not increased, but can be used in the summer. Enrollments have nearly doubled in the past seven summers, so there is a market. It appears that most students enroll in at least one summer term over their four years, taking on average about half a load (higher at some campuses where there are fee cap incentives to encourage enrollment).
The use of state funds to support teaching comes with an expectation that the proportion of summer courses taught by tenure/tenure track faculty will increase, rather than hiring graduate students or visiting lecturers as is typical in a self-supporting summer program. While the numbers have increased corresponding to enrollment increases, it continues to be a challenge to attract more of the regular-rank faculty to teach in the summer. Virtually all are adding a teaching term, being paid on an “overload” basis, rather than swapping out teaching from another term and teaching in the summer.
Carol at UC, at 2:15 pm EDT on August 2, 2006
Advertisement
or search for jobs directly.
The University of Minnesota is a premier employer and a talent magnet attracting leading faculty and staff from around the ... see job
The University of Minnesota is a premier employer and a talent magnet attracting leading faculty and staff from around the ... see job
Budget Specialist CNR Administrative Services Open for Recruitment: August 19, 2008 — September 2, 2008 Announcement #: ... see job
Hiring Range: $30,274 — $43,144 Pay Band: 5 State Classification: Administrative Coordinator I JOB DESCRIPTION: Recruit ... see job
Position Summary: Princeton University’s Office of Information Technology (OIT) has an opening for an ... see job
The California State University, Northridge (CSUN) department of Identity and Access Management (IAM), seeks an exceptional ... see job
The University of Minnesota is a premier employer and a talent magnet attracting leading faculty and staff from around the ... see job
Located just north of Houston, Texas, our five campuses serve 1,400 square miles. Our student enrollment is nearly 50,000 in ... see job
ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR, ANNUAL GIVING AND STRATEGY OPERATIONS — Annual Giving Strategy and Operations see job
The Savannah College of Art and Design seeks candidates for a full-time faculty position in interior design at the Savannah ... see job
Summer School
I understand the over-crowding that summer school can bring. What about the use of on-line courses through the summer? Hybrid courses are the wave of the future and a great way to conduct research and teach at the same time. Schools wouldn’t have to worry about class size or extra builldings. Thanks
Lawrence Linder, at 8:40 am EDT on July 25, 2006