News, Views and Careers for All of Higher Education
July 14, 2006
— Scott Jaschik and David Epstein
Want it on paper? Print this page.
Know someone who’d be interested? Forward this story.
Want to stay informed? Sign up for free daily news e-mail.
Advertisement
The State or Washington settlement postpones potentially tantalizing legal discussions and decisions on a national scale:
Do custodians at universities do exactly the same work as do those at state hospitals? Are the stated job descriptions and list of skills the same?
Perhaps even more importantly: Is the number of applicants (supply and demand) the same for each class of job?
One could speculate that custodians at a state university may need more diplomatic skills to dust around a tenured professor’s treasured collection of whats-its or perhaps a custodian in a state hospital may need to be much more intense and relentless about sanitizing critical patient care and treatment spaces.
Exactly equal pay for exactly equal work? Are governmental entities ever accurate in measuring such subtleties?
Dr. F. Gump, at 2:50 pm EDT on July 14, 2006
I must presume you’ve never looked for any refutation of _The Bell Curve_, as it’s widely acknowledged to be a methodological nightmare. For a simple example, one can be certain that administering English-language IQ tests to African tribespeople whose primary language is not English will probably not result in high IQ scores for them.
At any rate, one good place to start might be with _Scientific American_’s review of the book (_Scientific American_ February 1995 Volume 272 Number 2 Pages 99-103). It’s easy to digest, and you can find it easily on the web and go from there. As science, _The Bell Curve_ is simply not respected, and for good reason.
Thane Doss, Yomiuri Culture Centers, Tokyo, at 11:00 am EDT on July 15, 2006
Just call me Mike, I can’t afford to lose my job yet. I don’t have an opinion about the possibility of racial differences in intelligence, but it’s not a question that can be settled by decree, it’s a question of science, albeit squishy science, if it can be addressed at all.
One thing is for sure, there are group differences in current intellectual performance. The reasons could be many, I don’t claim to know what they are, but the differences are there. The unwillingness to face up to this, to bring it out in the open and discuss it, is one of the biggest dishonesties in public discourse today. It’s one of the biggest corruptions in the academic and intellectual world today.
just Mike, at 8:40 pm EDT on July 16, 2006
Advertisement
or search for jobs directly.
Director, Workforce Development/Corrections — Coffee Creek Correctional Facility Req Number 06949 Campus/Center Coffee Creek ... see job
George Fox University seeks a tri-lingual recruitment/admissions professional to assist with international student ... see job
Founded in 1898, and affiliated with what is now New York-Presbyterian Hospital since 1927, Weill Cornell Medical College ... see job
The University of Minnesota is a premier employer and a talent magnet attracting leading faculty and staff from around the ... see job
HACC, a leader in education in Central PA, is a comprehensive, multi-campus community college, providing quality instruction ... see job
Position Summary: The Linux Computer Engineer will develop programs for specialized applications (EPICS, ... see job
Chief, Pediatric Teaching Program, Moses Cone Health System, Greensboro, NC. Seeking qualified applicants to lead faculty of ... see job
Job Summary: Two Assistant Professor, Tenure-Line Positions. We are a highly collaborative, ... see job
East Carolina University, a constituent institution of the University of North Carolina, is a doctoral institution with an ... see job
Two Faculty openings for MR Physicists see job
Liberal Hypocrisy
The defenders of Ward Churchill at Colorado alleged that he was under attack for political reasons, and that the professor should not lose his job. It was a matter of academic freedom, and all should defend Churchill, and thereby defend their own rights. Frank Ellis in Britain, also made some controversial statements. The Left demanded he be fired and silenced. How many of the American liberals will urge the U. of Leeds to retain Ellis in the name of “adademic freedom"? And what did Ellis say? Nothing new to anyone who has read THE BELL CURVE. Might it be true? The Left has been unable to refute THE BELL CURVE. Should a professor be silenced if he states what may well be true — even if it be politically incorrect? The Left relies on academic terror, protest, firings to guarantee that no Frank Ellises remain on campus. Even Harvard’s Summers was fired after he made a reasonable suggestion about genetic differences between groups. “Academic freedom"? Or “academic tyranny,” enforced by the politically correct? And the West lectures the rest of the world about “academic freedom?————-Hugh Murray
Hugh Murray, Independent Scholar, at 2:50 pm EDT on July 14, 2006