News, Views and Careers for All of Higher Education
Dec. 16, 2005
The era of the second-year slump at Harvard Business School is over. Or maybe the days of student cooperation are over. Despite strong student opposition, the business school announced Wednesday that it was ending its ban on sharing grades with potential employers. Starting with new students who enroll in the fall, M.B.A. candidates can decide for themselves whether to share their transcripts.
The ban on grade-sharing has been enormously popular with students since it was adopted in 1998. Supporters say that it discouraged (or at least kept to a reasonable level) the kind of cut-throat competition for which business schools are known. With the ban, students said they were more comfortable helping one another or taking difficult courses.
But a memo sent to students by Jay O. Light, the acting dean, said that the policy was wrong. “Fundamentally, I believe it is inappropriate for HBS to dictate to students what they can and cannot say about their grades during the recruiting process. I believe you and your classmates earn your grades and should be accountable for them, as you will be accountable for your performance in the organizations you will lead in the future,” he wrote.
Light added that banning the release of grades was “inconsistent” with the business school’s commitment “to maintaining high academic standards.”
Harvard officials have said that employers vary on how much they would like to know students’ grades, with the financial services and consulting industries being most likely to want the data.
Even though current students are not affected, the possibility of a policy change has drawn widespread and vocal opposition among students at Harvard — and considerable interest from business schools elsewhere. A poll by The Harbus, the business school’s newspaper, found that only 5 percent of students favored the idea of reporting grades to employers.
Alex Michael, a second-year M.B.A. student and co-president of the Student Association, said that most students believe that revealing grades “will tamper with the collaborative nature of the classroom here and lead to even more competition.”
Michael also scoffed at the idea — which Harvard administrators have stressed — that students will still have the option not to reveal their grades. “Once those who want to release their grades, others who don’t want to will have to,” he said.
At the same time, Michael said that there was some truth to the suggestion that the ban on releasing grades made it possible for some students to slack off. He said that he didn’t see this in first-year students, but that there were “pockets” of second-year students who took advantage of the fact that they didn’t have to worry about anyone seeing their transcripts.
Harvard’s ban on releasing grades reflects a broader debate at business schools over figuring out the right level of competition for students.
Faculty members at the Wharton School are currently discussing whether the percentages of the classes that are designated for honors are too small. Currently, one set of honors is restricted to those graduating who were in the top 10 percent of their classes each semester, and another set of honors goes to those in the top 20 percent of their class over all. Some believe that expanding those percentages will reward more students, while others fear that the relatively low percentages make it possible for some students to avoid obsessing over grades, since an honors degree isn’t expected.
The Wharton School as an institution does not have a ban or requirement on disclosing grades, but the student government adopted a policy in 1994 banning the release of grades.
Serhan Secmen, student body president at Wharton, said that students there are proud that the policy is not a “top down” rule like the one Harvard is ending, but is one that they have come up with themselves. He said that even though the student government has no way to enforce the rule, students abide by it.
He said that keeping grades from prospective employers encourages “teamwork and student collaboration.”
Want it on paper? Print this page.
Know someone who’d be interested? Forward this story.
Want to stay informed? Sign up for free daily news e-mail.
Advertisement
Would business practices be improved if supervisors were prohibited from using evaluations to promote/demote employees? Rivalries might indeed weaken, and cooperation increase — but with a clear detriment to accountability.
My HBS experience (long before the 1998 grades rule) was strengthened by the daily experience in finding opportunities for collaboration and teamwork despite a competitive environment. After graduation, students will have to live with this tension between cooperation and competition; a sabbatical from accountability in the second MBA year is not good preparation for that reality.
The new HBS policy gives students a choice — and like most free-market systems, choice cures many ills. If students want to be insulated from grade pressure, they can live with the displeasure of consulting and investment banking firms. If they want to compete for plum jobs, they can put up with grade pressure.
Mike Hassell, COO at COnduit Corporation, at 5:24 pm EST on December 16, 2005
A return to personal, visible, accountability for one’s academic performance will be good for students, good for Harvard Business School, good for employers, and good for America. Bravo, Harvard!
Marvin McConoughey, at 9:06 pm EST on December 16, 2005
I find it amusing that HBS students are fearful that this new policy will lead to a more competitive atmosphere. How did these students obtain a spot at HBS? Oh! by surviving the cutthroat atmospheres at their high schools, colleges and jobs. Here is a newsflash for HBS student: the workforce that you are going to enter upon graduation is, er, competitive.
As for increasing the opportunity for honors at Wharton, I think it is a total joke. No more than 10% of any class should graduate with honors, otherwise the distinction is no distinction at all. Look at the honors system at Harvard College, it is a total joke. Any student who does not graduate with honors from Harvard looks like a moron. In my opinion, honors should go to the students in the top 10% of the class who ALSO complete a thesis.
Basil, at 5:35 pm EST on December 17, 2005
Advertisement
or search for jobs directly.
THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON POSITION ANNOUNCEMENT SENIOR ASSISTANT, ASSOCIATE, OR FULL PROFESSORS OF MARKETING The ... see job
Job Description: Ithaca College invites applications for the position of Director of Student Learning ... see job
The University of Minnesota is a premier employer and a talent magnet attracting leading faculty and staff from around the ... see job
The University of Minnesota is a premier employer and a talent magnet attracting leading faculty and staff from around the ... see job
Date of Appointment: 17 August 2009 Rank: Assistant Professor or Associate Professor Position Description: Full-time, tenure ... see job
Everest Institute, a respected member of the Corinthian Colleges’ network of schools, is dedicated to helping students ... see job
CalIT2 California Institute for Telecommunications and Information Technology Position: Project Scientists Salary: ... see job
CITY COLLEGE SAN FRANCISCO Position Title: Engineering and Technology Instructor Posting Number: 0080037 Filing Deadline (All ... see job
School of Medicine Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology Division of Gynecologic Oncology Position: Associate/Full Professor, ... see job
As an HBS alum, I say Bravo to the school for finally ending this ridiculous gag order. Why should individuals be prohibited from discussing with a prospective employer any part of their professional hisory, including school performance?
Pro golfers help each other all the time, despite being in direct competetion for fixed tournament prize money. If the students are generally refusing to help their classmates because of grade competition, then the school has a much deeper cultural problem than one that can be addressed by resticting free speech.
chris, at 9:23 am EST on December 16, 2005