Dec. 5, 2005

Half a Loaf at Hampton

On Friday, students at Hampton University who faced expulsion after being accused of violating university policy by handing out fliers focused on Hurricane Katrina, homophobia and other issues, were allowed to remain enrolled. Five of the seven charged students will each be required to perform 20 hours of community service after undergoing a hearing process conducted by administrators.

Looking for a job?

See all 190 new postings

Browse all job listings:

Faculty: 2,608
Administrative: 2,143
Executive: 155
FEATURED EMPLOYERS

“About a week ago, I went back to check what date we would be expected to formally present our proposal,” said Lisanne Magnus, president of the currently informal group of more than 50 students. She was told by Patra Johnson, a staff member who works in the student affairs office, that there is now a “moratorium” on creating student organizations at the university, Magnus said.

The group’s application read in part: “There is no organization at Hampton University that is designed specifically to fit the needs of the gay, lesbian, bi-sexual, transgendered, and questioning (GLBTQ) students. The proposed Gay Straight Alliance should be recognized because it will bring more diversity to Hampton University’s campus, and provide the GLBTQ students with a safe community of peers. This organization will uphold codes four and seven in the Hampton University Code Of Conduct by helping the students on Hampton University’s campus to learn from the differences in people, ideas and opinions and foster an open, fair, and caring environment (Hampton University Code of Conduct, 2000).”

Magnus, a sophomore, has tried contacting several administrators about this situation for confirmation of Johnson’s statement, but hasn’t received word back to date. More than one student indicated that the plan had been discussed by Bennie G. McMorris, the historically black university’s chief student affairs officer. On Saturday, Johnson referred all questions on this matter to McMorris. A man who answered McMorris’s cell phone on Saturday evening indicated that Inside Higher Ed had “the wrong number” after a reporter identified himself. Several more calls to the administrator’s cell phone and home number went unanswered.

A statement released by the university after Friday’s student hearing struck students as contradicting the university’s latest actions: “Hampton University has always and continues to be a champion of free speech and free expression,” according to the statement, which was released Friday. “Hampton University believes in the free flow and sharing of ideas among our faculty, staff and students.”

“I think those statements are 100 percent false,” said John Robinson, a student who faced charges at the Friday hearing. “They have a long, long history of repressing progressive thought among faculty and students.”

Robinson added that university officials have lost the paperwork several times when his currently informal student progressive group has petitioned for recognition.

Despite the moratorium, Robinson said Saturday that his group plans to soon petition the university again. Robinson said that more than one student he knows has been told by administrators that “there are too many groups on campus” when inquiring about the freeze issue.

Hampton is one of only a few institutions in its area that doesn’t have an official gay, lesbian, bisexual or transgender group on campus.

Magnus said that the situation at Hampton is directly correlated with the conservative politics of the current administration, headed by President William R. Harvey, who was appointed to the board of Fannie Mae by President George W. Bush. “It is an extremely conservative school concerned about its image,” she said. “But there are many, many liberal students on this campus — and they’re going to keep doing liberal things.”

— Rob Capriccioso

Want it on paper? Print this page.
Know someone who’d be interested? Forward this story.
Want to stay informed? Sign up for free daily news e-mail.

Comments

Is there really a need to protect students from ideas?

The fact that Hampton punishes students for handing out flyers or wants to reduce the number of club shows that the administration thinks that students can’t handle divergent opinions. Some kids can. Some kids need to be sheltered. Now everyone knows that kind of kid willingly attends Hampton.

Larry, at 8:31 am EST on December 5, 2005

Community Disservice

It’s rather ironic that Hampton University is using “community service” in order to punish students who were engaged in community service by making their fellow students aware of important political and social issues. If Hampton’s administrators really wanted to promote community service, they would stop punishing active students and start recognizing student organizations which promote civic engagement.

John K. Wilson, at 9:06 am EST on December 5, 2005

Where’s David Horowitz?

I’m still waiting for the Horowitz crowd to jump in the mix here, denounce the conservative bias on this campus, and demand that the “diversity of thought” be respected and upheld by the university administration. It’s an ultimate irony, of course, that this clear cultural and political bias is being registered at an historically black university, founded on the principles of equal treatment, civil rights, and respect for cultural difference. But I’m guessing that this is secretly what the Horowitzians have been wanting all along—a shift from one perceived political bias to another. The “principles” that he stands for are really nothing more than rhetoric aimed at building such neo-conservative institutions. Let’s put our cards on the table and recognize that there is no politically “neutral” form of academia—either you go the way of the neo-conservative ideologues, or you uphold the liberal principles of academia that have long managed to hold out against the waves of cultural conservatism that have swept through our religious and political institutions. The conservatives know that this is a fight for dominance, not for “equality,” which is a liberal principle that they’ve adopted for their own rhetorical uses. It’s time for liberal intellectuals and students to put away the kid gloves and come out swinging, as some of these students have done. Remember, Horowitz (the liberal) earned his wings doing just that for the other side in the 60s.

huntly, at 10:24 am EST on December 5, 2005

Hmm

Considering that liberal universities have been doing this stuff for years, don’t expect much sympathy. (Though for the record, I hope Hampton will reconsider.)

Kevin, Undergraduate, at 12:54 pm EST on December 5, 2005

Is anyone reading closely?

About “Where’s David Horowitz? .. I’m still waiting for the Horowitz crowd to jump in the mix here ..

Right here, for those who actually read ..

http://insidehighered.com/news/2005/11/18/tenure

” .. In the former, a popular anthropology professor at Yale is losing his job — and his supporters say that it’s because he is an anarchist and a backer of graduate student unions. ..”

Hmm .. where’s the right-wing bias here? Hmm ..

B.J., Someone who actually reads at Small College, at 1:43 pm EST on December 5, 2005

Interesting post by Huntly. He starts by saying what he thinks Horowitz won’t do, and then uses that to lambaste him for what he ’secretly wants’—which the poster knows all about. These are the ‘liberal principles of academia’?

Douglas Lewis, at 9:37 pm EST on December 5, 2005