News, Views and Careers for All of Higher Education
Sept. 6, 2005
And then there were 15.
The National Collegiate Athletic Association on Friday dropped Central Michigan University and the University of Utah from its list of institutions deemed to have “hostile and abusive” Native American nicknames and therefore restricted from participating in NCAA championships. The decision follows by 10 days a similar ruling that took Florida State off the original list of 18, which was announced August 5.
Like Florida State before it, the NCAA said, Central Michigan (whose teams are known as the Chippewas) and Utah (the Utes) were able to show on appeal that they have the support of the namesake tribes. “The NCAA staff review committee noted the relationship between the universities and the Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe of Michigan and the Northern Ute Indian Tribe, respectively, as a significant factor,” said Bernard Franklin, the NCAA’s vice president for governance and membership.
Officials from the two institutions expressed their satisfaction at the NCAA’s reversal. “The university is pleased by the NCAA’s decision to remove CMU from the list of universities deemed to be hostile and abusive in the use of the Chippewa nickname,” Central Michigan’s president, Michael Rao, said in a news release. “CMU cherishes its ongoing relationship with the Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe. The university appreciates the NCAA’s timely response to its appeal and the university is pleased to put this chapter behind it.”
Utah’s president, Michael K. Young, said that its appeal, which it sent to the NCAA on Wednesday, was accompanied by a letter in which leaders of the Northern Ute Indian Tribal Business Committee said they were “proud of the Ute name and the culture it represents. Indeed, the Ute name and culture are the predicates of our State’s name: Utah.” Young himself said: “The university has a good, long standing relationship with the Ute Tribe. We value their support and will work closely with the Tribe to ensure that the Ute name continues to be used in an honorable and respectful manner.”
Since the NCAA unveiled its policy on Native American imagery a month ago, which barred institutions with mascots and names deemed “hostile and abusive” from playing host to NCAA championships and from otherwise displaying those icons and names at NCAA-sponsored events, critics have questioned the four-year process the NCAA used for crafting the policy and the original list of 18 (the NCAA has yet to make an initial determination about whether one other institution, the College of William and Mary, belongs on the list for its use of the “Tribe” name).
Several colleges on the original list complained that the NCAA had ignored evidence they had put forward in the NCAA’s initial review about their longstanding ties to Indian tribes and those tribes’ support for their use of the names and imagery. Officials at some of the colleges said privately that the NCAA could have saved itself a significant public opinion pounding if it had paid more attention to the tribal views originally.
Bob Williams, the NCAA’s managing director of public and media relations, said in an interview Friday that the NCAA’s appeals process, which it announced two weeks after it unveiled the original policy, had been designed to place more emphasis on the tribes’ opinions. “Although the tribal input certainly was a factor in the original review, it is now a primary factor” in the appeals,” Williams said.
He also said that in each of the three cases on which the NCAA has reversed itself so far, there were aspects and information that we found out after, that we didn’t have before, about tribal support.”
Only one other institution, the University of North Dakota, whose teams are known as the Fighting Sioux, has appealed the NCAA’s decision so far. But while North Dakota has said it has support from at least some of the branches of the Sioux tribe, one of them, the Spirit Lake Sioux, reportedly voted last week to oppose the university’s continued use of the name.
Most of the other colleges on the list have names like Indians or Braves or Warriors, for which it seems unlikely they will be able to show support from a particular tribe.
Want it on paper? Print this page.
Know someone who’d be interested? Forward this story.
Want to stay informed? Sign up for free daily news e-mail.
Advertisement
The policy is racist. Once again “the great white father” telling people of color what is good for them. What about all the schools with white masacots?
William, at 10:57 am EDT on September 12, 2005
The NCAA is just being silly. What’s next? Vegetarians complaining that “Tigers” and “Lions” are used as mascots? Anything and everything can be “hostile and offensive” to somebody!
What the NCAA has failed to miss in this discussion is the *intention* of the mascot use. None of the mascots in use are meant to be “hostile and offensive” — it’s simply a historical name. Are our current military members going to feel offended by the mascot “Patriots"?
Glenn, at 4:37 am EDT on October 21, 2005
Advertisement
or search for jobs directly.
South Texas College Job Announcement # 2010 – 3007 Position pending Board approval of FY10 Budget Please note that only ... see job
Central Michigan University, a Carnegie Foundation doctoral research university, is in the Lower Peninsula in a tourist ... see job
Urban College with 21,000 students at the base of Rocky Mountain, in Colorado. see job
Penn State Great Valley (PSGV) invites applications for a tenure-track position in accounting for its AACSB-accredited ... see job
Posting Description: University of Colorado Denver Senior Professional Research Assistant Sleep Behavior ... see job
The University is located in Southwest Florida midway between Naples and Fort Myers. The 760-acre campus is situated in one ... see job
Join the Pack! A community with nearly 8,000 faculty and staff, and 30,000 students. NC State is one of the largest employers ... see job
School of Business Campus: Beirut—Byblos Vacancy date: Fall 2009 see job
East Carolina University, a constituent institution of the University of North Carolina, is a doctoral institution with an ... see job
Michigan Technological University announces a Strategic Faculty Hiring Initiative (SFHI) that will add ten tenure-track ... see job
I understand that the NCAA and other Native Americans are being careful to respect the sovereignty of the tribes/nations in question. But the problem with this method of allowing namesake tribes to “license” mascot use is that other Native Americans who live in the state have no say. Native families living in Tallahassee who are not Seminole will now have to raise their children in the shadow of this stereotyping. Meanwhile the members of the Seminole Tribe of Florida, who licensed the use, are hundreds of miles away. The Ute and Chippewa tribes that authorized those names are much closer, but still, other Native people in Michigan and Utah may not feel the same way. It’s a complicated question and I hope the NCAA will remember that they are trying not only to ensure respect for Native Americans, but also to ensure a climate of inclusiveness and respect in college sports. Non-Native students and university leaders are the ones toward whom the “teachable moment” was directed and particularly in the FSU case, their public comments make it clear they didn’t learn anything.
Carol Spindel, author of Dancing at Halftime at University of Ilinois at Urbana-Champaign, at 9:15 am EDT on September 6, 2005