News, Views and Careers for All of Higher Education
July 15, 2005
Experts have been warning for a few years now that the United States is at risk of losing its lead position in the education of science and engineering Ph.D.’s. A new report from the National Bureau of Economic Research shows just how vulnerable that position is.
Indeed, the report finds that if China continues to expand science and engineering programs at its current pace (which may not be possible), it would overtake the United States in producing Ph.D.’s in those fields as early as 2010.
For the United States to be overtaken in such a short period of time raises significant questions about the country’s economic and educational future, the report warns, while offering a history of how the current situation developed.
In 1970, the United States was riding high in higher education, enrolling about 30 percent of the world’s college students and granting more than half of all science and engineering doctorates. But the report notes that these achievements were in part the result of conditions elsewhere, such as the flight of European scientists who escaped the Nazis by coming to the U.S., and the relatively slow recovery of European higher education after World War II.
Since 1970, much of the world has expanded postsecondary enrollment, especially in science and engineering. By 2001, the percentage of all college students in the world who were being educated in the United States had fallen to 14 percent.
Enrollments outside the United States aren’t just going up, but they are rising especially in science and engineering. As the report documents, in 2000, 17 percent of bachelor’s degrees in the United States were in science and engineering, compared to 27 percent worldwide and 52 percent in China.
Growth in China has also been impressive at the doctoral level, the report says, even though Chinese universities were not really awarding any doctorates in science and engineering as late as 1975. Between 1995 and 2003, the report says, first-year entrants in Ph.D. programs in China increased to 48,740, from 8,139. While the report acknowledges that growth at that rate hurts the quality of programs, it adds that any quality “discount” will disappear over time.
The report, “Does Globalization of the Scientific/Engineering Workforce Threaten U.S. Economic Leadership?” was written by Richard B. Freeman, the Herbert Ascherman Chair in Economics at Harvard University and director of the Labor Studies Program at the National Bureau of Economic Research. The report may be purchased online, for $5, from the bureau’s Web site.
Want it on paper? Print this page.
Know someone who’d be interested? Forward this story.
Want to stay informed? Sign up for free daily news e-mail.
Advertisement
Quick thoughts:
1. USA is in the First World. China and India are moving into that sector, over the next 40 years. Isn’t that kind of movement also described as ‘parity?’
2. Several news publications have reported some native Chinese and Indians have returned home, based on public and/or private support for their research efforts. This is as opposed to the USA environment, whereupon most any new research proposal draws opposition from any one of hundreds of major interest groups. That is, they return home, to encounter less resistance.
Given the aforementioned resistance in the USA — would increasing PhDs, cut that resistance? Or merely increase the ‘noise’ level? Or both?
Thor, at 7:46 am EDT on July 15, 2005
Another quick thought:
Given that the United States is making it even more difficult for foreign students to get VISAs to come and study here, how does this affect the issue? What about when they do come, study here, go home for a holiday or between semesters, only to face difficulties re-entering the U.S. to complete their degrees? If foreign students realize they can get their higher education in their home countries or Europe with less hassle than coming here, they are more likely not to come. And that is just foreign students. Add to it the fact that less students here are getting degrees in math and science, and you have to ask some serious questions about the future.
Itinerant Librarian, at 7:18 pm EDT on July 15, 2005
This is the kind of misleading statistical horror story thast bespeaks a political agenda rather than any effort at actual investigation.
Critically lacking from this story are actual numbers of degrees awarded in these various regions. It would be one thing if the number of degrees awarded in the U.S. was dropping dramatically. It is quite another if the number is staying the same or increasing. The fact that other regions are ramping up their educational capabilities should, on balance, be a good thing, unless we think there is a scarcity of available students.
The U.S. “dominance” was apparently by default, rather than because of some extraordinary superiority of the U.S. offerings. I happen to believe that the U.S. will remain strong as a source of high-quality higher education, but I cannot imagine by what right institutions in the U.S. should feel some automatic entitlement to remain the only game in town.
Voiceguy, at 7:19 pm EDT on July 15, 2005
It should be noted that the US has less than 5% of the global population. Barring racist assumptions and such, it is only natural to assume that over time our dominant status in higher education will erode.
Kevin, at 4:44 am EDT on August 17, 2005
Advertisement
or search for jobs directly.
East Carolina University, a constituent institution of the University of North Carolina, is a doctoral institution with an ... see job
Job Description: Teaching world regional geography or physical geography.
Duties of ... see job
The University of California Riverside invests in your future through employee training and career development, access to ... see job
Join the Pack! A community with nearly 8,000 faculty and staff, and 30,000 students. NC State is one of the largest employers ... see job
Description The Associate Registrar for Information Services (IS) is one of the senior leadership staff members for the ... see job
The Universidad de Monterrey (UDEM) invites nominations and applications for the position Full Time Tenure Track Professor ... see job
The Office of Information Technology (OIT) is responsible for the development and delivery of a wide spectrum of IT services ... see job
A.K. Hinds University Center’s Mission Statement: A.K. Hinds University Center’s mission is to provide a dynamic and ... see job
Implement and manage a comprehensive media relations program designed to further the university’s strategic goals and ... see job
SOUTHWESTERN COLLEGE EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY ASSISTANT PROFESSOR OF MATHEMATICS SCHOOL OF MATHEMATICS, SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ... see job
Why the United States is not producing enough doctorates
The High water mark in U.S. public education (K-120 was the year 1960. In that year approximately 74% of all public high school students graduated, with many moving on to college and university and a substantial number of these college students went on the graduate school and the Ph.d.
After 1960, high school curricula began to be seriously adulterated by the elimination of the truly demanding subjects. These subjects in many cases included Latin, Greek, Rhetoric, Math including Calculus, and other challenging courses in Literature, History, Civics, Music and Art. With the exit of these kinds of classes and the teachers qualified to teach them and challenge challenge them to higher orders of intellectual development and creativity, the reserve of potential Ph.d. students began to dry up.
How dow we turn this situation around? In any event it will take a long time to turn around. It took us 60 years to arrive at our current and sad state of affairs. I have more to say, but not the time and space to properly do so here.
Thank you for this opportunity to share some of my thoughts on this matter.
Yours Faithfully,
Dr. Douglas M. Cotner
Dr. Douglas M. Cotner, Chief Scientise at SUSDEV-GLOBALONE, at 4:45 am EST on March 5, 2008